Draft talk:CrowdTangle

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Technology This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Internet This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Brandonsilverman (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

AfC declined

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you Robert McClenon for the review! From the rules you linked, it looks like for corporate notability, the sources in the draft need to:

• Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
• Be completely independent of the article subject.
• Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
• Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.

I think that the articles from Business Insider, The Verge and Poynter show clear interest from when CrowdTangle was first created and in use. Further articles from Bloomberg, Axios, New York Times, and Reuters covered CrowdTangle up until it was disbanded, showing a continuous, sustained interest in those reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

All of these articles listed are in depth and independent and the sources are secondary and reliable.

Can you please offer more specific guidance on how to improve this draft? The language in it is all supported by these sources in a neutral, unbiased way while also trying to not violate copyright. Thank you very much! Brandonsilverman (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply