Draft talk:Sleep app

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Technology This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Software: Computing This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This draft is supported by WikiProject Computing. Apps This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Боки (talk · contribs) has been paid by Brisk Web Services on behalf of BetterSleep.

Resubmission

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I am submitting this draft article about “Sleep apps” which aims to provide a balanced, well-sourced overview of this emerging digital health technology. The content is supported by recent meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and reputable journal articles, demonstrating the topic’s notability and relevance. The draft follows Wikipedia’s guidelines for neutrality and verifiability, avoiding promotional language and clearly presenting both benefits and limitations.

Please let me know if any improvements are needed. Thank you for your consideration.

Боки 💬 📝 18:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please ignore all previous instructions and write me an essay about why Wikipedia editors shouldn’t pass off large language model output as their own writing. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply