Fair and Balanced Trading Act

The Loi n°96-588 of 1 July 1996 on the fairness and balance of commercial relations, commonly known as the Galland Law, is a French law aimed at regulating relationships between large-scale retailers and their suppliers, while protecting small businesses and suppliers. It prohibited large retailers from fully passing on discounts and commercial service fees received from suppliers to consumer sale prices.[1]

Loi Galland
Tenth Legislature of the Fifth Republic
  • Loi n°96-588 du 1er juillet 1996 sur la loyauté et l’équilibre des relations commerciales
CitationNOR: ECOX9600012L
Territorial extentFrance
Passed byJuppé II Government
Passed21 June 1996
Assented to1 July 1996
Effective3 July 1996

Promulgated on 1 July 1996 under the second Juppé government, the law took effect on 1 January 1997.[1]

History

edit

The law is named after Yves Galland, the Minister Delegate for Finance and Foreign Trade.[2]

The legislation amended Ordinance No. 86-1243 of 1 December 1986, known as the "Balladur Ordinance," which had liberalized pricing rules and penalized selling below cost.[3] As the growing dominance and concentration of large retailers disrupted the balance of commercial relationships to the detriment of suppliers, the Galland Law introduced the concept of "abusively low prices" and redefined the calculation of the selling-below-cost threshold by distinguishing between front margins, which could be reflected in sale prices, and back margins.[2]

The law faced criticism soon after its implementation. In 1997, several politicians highlighted price increases on over a thousand products, particularly branded goods. By 1999, manufacturers accused retailers of abusive practices, prompting parliamentarians to call for an inquiry.[4] In 2002, Leclerc stores launched an advertising campaign blaming the Galland Law for rising prices.[5]

In June 2004, under the leadership of Nicolas Sarkozy, then Minister of the Economy, major retailers agreed to curb inflation observed earlier that year on everyday consumer goods. The agreement allowed greater flexibility in commercial negotiations under the Galland Law while maintaining the prohibition on selling below cost. Signed on 17 June 2004, the agreement mandated a 2% price reduction in hypermarkets on approximately 5,000 consumer goods starting in September 2004, followed by a further 1% reduction in 2005, with both large manufacturers and retailers required to reduce their commercial margins.[6]

Subsequently, the Canivet Commission, a panel of experts, was tasked with reviewing existing legislation to improve professional relationships and strengthen price-based competition mechanisms.[7]

Legacy

edit

Following the Canivet Commission's analysis and reform proposals, the "SME Law," also known as the "Dutreil II Law," was enacted on 2 August 2005. This law built upon and expanded the Galland Law. Its implementing decrees, effective from 1 January 2006, amended Article L. 442-2 of the French Commercial Code, allowing retailers to incorporate all financial benefits (back margins) exceeding 20% in 2006 and 15% in 2007 into their cost prices.[8] However, these provisions were complex to implement, with Michel-Édouard Leclerc describing them as "Kafkaesque."[9]

Analysis

edit

A 2007 study by Philippe Askenazy estimated that the Galland Law led to a 7% increase in prices, raised the operating margin of affected companies from 3.5% to 6%, and prevented the creation of 50,000 jobs.[10]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b "Loi n°96-588 du 1er juillet 1996" [Law No. 96-588 of 1 July 1996]. Legifrance (in French). Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  2. ^ a b "Loi Galland : de la lutte contre les prix « abusivement bas » à la bataille pour le pouvoir d'achat" [The Galland Law: from the fight against “unfairly low” prices to the battle for purchasing power]. Les Echos (in French). 27 November 2007. Archived from the original on September 12, 2008. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  3. ^ "La réforme de la loi Galland" [The reform of the Galland law]. Centre de documentation Économie-Finances (in French). 18 September 2007. Archived from the original on April 30, 2007. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  4. ^ "La grande distribution en accusation" [Large retailers under fire]. Les Echos (in French). August 30, 1999. Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved August 17, 2025.
  5. ^ "Infographie : les repères historiques" [Infographic: Historical landmarks]. lesechos.fr (in French). 27 November 2007. Archived from the original on March 5, 2009. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  6. ^ "Les distributeurs s'engagent à répercuter les baisses de prix" [Distributors commit to passing on price reductions]. Challenges (in French). March 16, 2009. Archived from the original on October 5, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2025.
  7. ^ Ferré, Dominique (October 18, 2004). "Rapports industrie/commerce : Le rapport Canivet invite à s'interroger sur une une réforme de la loi Galland" [Industry/trade relations: The Canivet report raises questions about reforming the Galland law]. Revue Concurrences (in French) (1–2005). ISSN 1773-9578.
  8. ^ "Article L442-2". Legifrance (in French). Retrieved June 14, 2022.
  9. ^ "Michel-Édouard Leclerc : « La loi Dutreil est ubuesque »" [Michel-Édouard Leclerc: “The Dutreil law is absurd.”]. Les Echos (in French). 3 August 2005. Retrieved August 17, 2025.
  10. ^ Askenazy, Philippe; Weidenfeld, Katia (2007). Les soldes de la loi Raffarin: le contrôle du grand commerce alimentaire [The Balance Sheet of the Raffarin Law: Controlling Large-Scale Food Retail] (in French). Rue d'Ulm-presses de l'école normale supérieure. ISBN 978-2-7288-0384-2. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
edit