Multi-source hypothesis

The Multi-source hypothesis is a proposed solution to the synoptic problem, holding that Matthew, Mark, and Luke are not directly interdependent but have each drawn from a distinct combination of earlier documents. It encompasses a family of theories differing in the particulars of the nature and relationships of these earlier documents.

Multi-source hypothesis
Theory Information
OrderProto, Q
A, B
Matt, Mark, Luke
Additional SourcesQ-source, Proto, A, B
Gospels' Sources
MatthewA, Q
MarkA, B
LukeB, Q
Theory History
OriginatorHerbert Marsh
Proponents

An early form of the theory was proposed by Herbert Marsh over two centuries ago.[1] More recently, Marie-Émile Boismard proposed a structurally similar theory,[2] which was further developed by Philippe Rolland[3] and Delbert Burkett. Alan Kirk and Christopher Skinner have critiqued Burkett’s model for the Synoptic Problem.[4][5][6]

According to these theories, the common material among the three synoptic gospels ultimately derives from a proto-gospel somewhat like Mark. This proto-gospel underwent two independent revisions, A and B. Mark was formed by recombining these two revisions. Matthew built upon A and Luke upon B. Both Matthew and Luke also drew from a common source Q, as well as other sources for their unique material.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Marsh 1823, pp. 167–409.
  2. ^ Boismard 1979, pp. 1–17.
  3. ^ Rolland 1984, p. 136 Rolland hypothesizes a proto-Matthew source originally composed in Hebrew
  4. ^ Burkett 2004, pp. 141–2 Burkett hypothesizes a proto-Mark source originally composed in Greek
  5. ^ Kirk, Alan. "Orality, Writing, and Phantom Sources". New Testament Studies. 58 (1): 1–22.
  6. ^ Skinner, Christopher. "Review of Delbert Burkett, Rethinking the Gospel Sources". Review of Biblical Literature. 2.

Sources

edit