In the mathematical fields of category theory and abstract algebra, a subquotient is a quotient object of a subobject. Subquotients are particularly important in abelian categories, and in group theory, where they are also known as sections, though this conflicts with a different meaning in category theory.

So in the algebraic structure of groups, is a subquotient of if there exists a subgroup of and a normal subgroup of so that is isomorphic to .

In the literature about sporadic groups wordings like " is involved in "[1] can be found with the apparent meaning of " is a subquotient of ".

As in the context of subgroups, in the context of subquotients the term trivial may be used for the two subquotients and which are present in every group .[citation needed]

A quotient of a subrepresentation of a representation (of, say, a group) might be called a subquotient representation; e. g., Harish-Chandra's subquotient theorem.[2]

Example

edit

There are subquotients of groups which are neither a subgroup nor a quotient of it. For example, according to the article Sporadic group, Fi22 has a double cover which is a subgroup of Fi23, so it is a subquotient of Fi23 without being a subgroup or quotient of it.

Order relation

edit

The relation subquotient of is an order relation, which shall be denoted by  . It shall be proved for groups.

Notation
Let G be a group, let G be a subgroup of G, let G′′ be a normal subgroup of G, and let H be the quotient group G′ / G′′. Then we say that H is a subquotient of G. In symbols, let G′′ ◃ G′ ≤ G and H = G′ / G′′; then HG. This relationship has the following properties:
  1. Reflexivity:  , i. e. every element is related to itself. Indeed,   is isomorphic to the subquotient   of  .
  2. Antisymmetry: if   and   then  ; that is, no two distinct elements precede each other. Indeed, a comparison of the group orders of   and   then yields   from which  .
  3. Transitivity: if   and   then  .

Proof of transitivity for groups

edit

Let   be a subquotient of  , let   be a subquotient of  , and let   be the canonical homomorphism. Then in the following diagram, all vertical ( ) maps  

               
         
             

are surjective for the respective pairs

               

The preimages   and   are both subgroups of   containing   and it is   and   because every   has a preimage   with   Moreover, the subgroup   is normal in  

As a consequence, the subquotient   of   is a subquotient of   of the form  

Relation to cardinal order

edit

In constructive set theory, where the law of excluded middle does not necessarily hold, one can consider the relation subquotient of as replacing the usual order relation(s) on cardinals. When one has the law of the excluded middle, then a subquotient   of   is either the empty set or there is an onto function  . This order relation is traditionally denoted   If additionally the axiom of choice holds, then   has a one-to-one function to   and this order relation is the usual   on corresponding cardinals.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Griess, Robert L. (1982), "The Friendly Giant", Inventiones Mathematicae, 69: 1−102, Bibcode:1982InMat..69....1G, doi:10.1007/BF01389186, hdl:2027.42/46608, S2CID 123597150
  2. ^ Dixmier, Jacques (1996) [1974], Enveloping algebras, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 11, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-0560-2, MR 0498740 p. 310