Talk:Accelerator-driven subcritical reactor

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why is this idea being promoted ? Is for cheap power, safety, non-proliferation or what ? Intro could clarify. - Rod57 (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I think the whole Safety section answers that, it's super safe nuclear power. Mathiastck (talk) 02:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Merge Energy amplifier into Accelerator-driven subcritical reactor

Latest comment: 25 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A proposal to merge Energy amplifier into Accelerator-driven subcritical reactor was initiated in March by Doeze: They are as far as I can tell fully identical nuclear power concepts. Each article has very different coverage, but the latter is a far better title. I'm opening this to facilitate discussion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 16:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

can you please share the links from where this data has been extracted?? 2407:D000:B:6A55:CD0A:C116:7B6B:1FB5 (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply