Talk:Block matrix

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Thiagovscoelho in topic Major revision, archived previous talk page

Major revision, archived previous talk page

edit

I have just added the majority of the current page content, so the previous discussions were outdated, since they referred to a considerably different page.Thiagovscoelho (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I believe that the statement "This is also true when  ,  , or  ." is false.
If  , then   Note the change in order of   and   (we have   instead of  ). Similarly, if  , then   should be replaced with   (i.e. we get  ) and if  , then we should have  . Note for the last two results, you have to use commutativity of the underlying ring, but not for the first two.
The Surgeon of Death (talk) 14:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I was definitely relying entirely on the sources cited for each of the properties mentioned. Since that sentence did not have a source cited inline next to it, I don't remember why I put that in, if I did, although it may be something I got confused about while reading the sources cited for the surrounding sentences. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 13:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)Reply