Talk:Chebotarev density theorem

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics Mid‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale. Russia: Science & education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.

On 31 March 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Chebotarev's density theorem to Chebotarev density theorem. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 31 March 2025

Latest comment: 4 months ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

---

Chebotarev's density theorem → Chebotarev density theorem – Significantly more common according to Google Scholar. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:43, 31 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Russia and WikiProject Mathematics have been notified of this discussion. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

• Support. I agree the proposed name is more common. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
• Support. Note sure why we had "'s" in the first place. -- Taku (talk) 07:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.