Talk:Game Description Language

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong Name

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Actually this language is called Game Description Language not Game Definition Language.
However I do not know how to edit this (or I am afraid to do so, because I will break links etc. -- )
Reference: GGP Language Specification
(See right below title: "An Overview of GDL")
--Freak42 09:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

---

I've done this, thanks for pointing that out. Damburger 17:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Importance

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Even though it's a fascinating approach in a (very) crowded field, I've assessed this article as having low importance. yoyo (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Suspect Prose

Latest comment: 21 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The fourth paragraph in the article raised some alarm bells for me:

"This innovation is a testament to the convergence of logic-based formalism and the world of games, opening new horizons for AI's potential in understanding and mastering a multitude of games. Game Description Language equips AI with a universal key to unlock the mysteries of diverse game environments and strategies."

The prose and syntax read as having been LLM generated. Furthermore, it reads like a superfluous opinion to the rest of the article. Randozart (talk) 12:10, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply