Talk:Heart Protection Study

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pharmacology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Cardiology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Interpreation

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

'There was no mortality benefit in women with a statistical "p-value" that did not reach significance (0.08)'

Is this an erroneous double negative?

Notreallydavid (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply