Talk:High- and low-level
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Stevebroshar in topic Naming for this article
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This page needs a disambiguation link to High Level, Alberta —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.213.199.33 (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Hyphenation
editCompound adjective use should be hyphentated see compounds words and English compound. The article should probably be renamed as well. 188.223.5.83 (talk) 21:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Naming for this article
editI think we should naming for this article is "Description Level", describe the differences between the high-level and low-level description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thaingo84 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Well, that makes sense if that's what this article is about. But, I don't think that's what it's about. It's an article in search of value. The words "high level" and "low level" are not really concepts. They are used to describe concepts, but not concepts on their own. And the thing that they refer to as either high or low depends on context. I could have a high/low level description. I can have a high/low level of abstraction. I can have high/low level structure. The content is mostly a list; examples of things referred to as high/low level. IMO the article should be deleted. Stevebroshar (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)