Talk:Highest median voting rules

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Fourhazzy in topic Participation failure doesn't make sense?

Merging Majority Judgment, Usual Judgment in

edit

The Majority Judgment and Usual judgment articles restate much of the info presented in this article and the two voting systems differ only in their tiebreaker rules, with the main difference in each being "advantages" sections, which can probably be summarized in a more general comparison section. Anecdotally, I was rather confused about the systems until I read this article and understood they differ only in tie-breaking methods. Putnam3145 (talk) 00:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Participation failure doesn't make sense?

edit

In the current state of the article, it says under Disadvantages, that candidate A would lose to candidate B if they got an extra vote. However, it makes sense that A would lose to B upon receiving an extra vote of 4, since 4 is disapproving. I might be misunderstanding, and I'm not skilled enough to rewrite something as simple as that anyway. Fourhazzy (talk) 19:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

4 is not disapproving, because it rates the alternatives lower- the vote indicates that A is better than B and C, so it effectively approving A over those two. You could rewrite the example using higher numbers and it wouldn't change the outcome :) VineFynn (talk) 03:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
ah, okay. got it Fourhazzy (talk) 00:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply