Talk:Inference

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Statistics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Philosophy: Logic High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Logic

Archives

Archive 1

Circumvents "Getting to Philosophy"

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! This page forms part of the loop:

Reason --> Logic --> Logical Reasoning --> Inference --> Reason

 Atomic putty? Rien!  16:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Review the Web Pages of the Network Links Below and Take Necessary Actions.

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rule of inference

Talk:Rule of inference/Archives/2025/January#Review the Web Pages of the Network Links Below and Take Necessary Actions.

List of rules of inference

Talk:List of rules of inference#The table with 3 columns and 12 rows under the heading "Table: Rules of Inference" is currently missing 8 different rows. 88.241.82.180 (talk) 14:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

tangential potential flaw in example reasoning

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the example about a siberian soccer team from a secret research city winning a seemingly abnormal amount because they have the best players available I'm not sure if a city full of scientists with full time research jobs have much spare time to practice soccer or that having a big scientific talent pool would imply having a big athletic talent pool too. 205.175.106.17 (talk) 22:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply