Talk:List of Bluetooth protocols

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Telecommunications Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Computing: Networking Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Talk

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Yes I think that an overview of all of the bluetooth protocols would be a better place for this article

Should ACL and SCO logical transports be moved to a different section? Those are really not protocols, and therefore I do not believe they belong here. Introiboad (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

1. can not find reason why the SCO/eSCO do not require to go through Host stack? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.118.171.95 (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply