Talk:Max Boot

Latest comment: 20 days ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleMax Boot was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 31, 2009Good article nomineeListed
August 11, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wife accused of being an unregistered foreign agent

edit

And questions about him: https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-posts-max-boot-under-fire-after-wife-accused-being-unregistered-agent-south-korea TuckerResearch (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article review

edit

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed that following:

  • There's a "sources are too closely associated with the subject" orange banner at the top of the article. Has this been addressed?
  • The lead contains new publications written by Boot, but these are not mentioned in the "Career" section.
  • The "Career" and "Political beliefs" sections are too long and have too many small paragraphs. I suggest that these use level 3 headings and reformatted.
  • The lead does not summarise the political beliefs of the subject.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:03, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

There's a "sources are too closely associated with the subject" orange banner at the top of the article since October 2023. Has this been addressed? The lead contains new publications written by Boot, but these are not mentioned in the "Career" section. The "Career" and "Political beliefs" sections are too long and have too many small paragraphs. I suggest that these use level 3 headings to break up the text and be reformatted into larger, fewer paragraphs. The lead does not summarise the political beliefs of the subject. There might be some post-2018 information that should be added to "Career" section. Z1720 (talk) 02:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

FWIW. All 6 of the top contributors, responsible for more than 80% of the text, have not edited for several years. This does not necessarily mean no one else will come forward in the next 10 or so days to work on the article, of course, but perhaps the likelihood of that is small. Donner60 (talk) 06:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.