This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Can the deleter of this page please explain why it was deleted without asking the community, or even putting it up for deletion first? Havok(T/C/e/c) 19:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
You really should ask that directly of User:Tone on their talk page. Protesting here does not do a huge amount of good. Tone did not give a deletion reason, so I can only speculate, but I would guess that it was deleted as A7 non-notable corporation. This would have fallen under speedy deletion, and no debate or notice is required for speedy deletions. Please do see WP:CORP for notability requirements for corporations. If you cannot show that those requirements are met, then you are likely fighting a losing battle here. But anyway, talk to Tone first, to get a specific explanation of the deletion. If you still have a problem, you can allways post a request for a review at WP:DRV. - TexasAndroid (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Only now I see what was the problem. The person who tagged it db-spam placed the tag under the infobox so it didn't show up in the log. Anyway, the article is restored and on afd now. --Tone22:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The reason given for the split tag is
""obvious reason", the game was notable due to all the coverage"
I am opposed to this because:
1) The reason given is not a reason to split.
2) The material covering Project Offset is too small to make a viable article.
3) The material covering Project Offset does not dominate the article.
4) The article is too small to justify a split on size alone.
