Talk:Rabbit Ears Productions

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

The content of Rabbit Ears Productions media and release information was merged into Rabbit Ears Productions on 04 May 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that ___location, see its talk page.

Merge

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I propose merging the list at Rabbit Ears Productions media and release information to here. Seems unnecessary to have the info split and partially duplicated. It could (of course) be re-split later on, should the article grow by a large amount. I'll get around to it in the next few days, if noone objects. -- Quiddity (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the merge and considering that nobody has raised any objections, I've gone ahead merged the material. -- Whpq (talk) 14:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply