Talk:Semantics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Semantics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Semantics has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 15, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Theoretical Linguistics / Philosophy of language Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force. This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force. Philosophy: Logic / Social and political / Language High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Logic Social and political philosophy Philosophy of language Cognitive science (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Religion Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Semantics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in semantics, antonym is an antonym of synonym while synonym is not a synonym of antonym? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Semantics.

Wikipedia

Archives (Index)

2023/November 2024/February 2024/March 2024/June 2024/September 2025/May

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Start a discussion about improving the Semantics page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Semantics" page.

Start a discussion