Talk:Stellar age estimation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. Requested articles This article is within the scope of WikiProject Requested articles, because it is used for the administration of the Requested articles process or it was formerly listed at Requested articles.

Suggestions

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article could mention:

• Isochrone method.
• Lithium abundance.

Thank you. Regards, RJH (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I will begin research on those topics. Also, how can I improve the quality rating of the article?

No mention of Asteroseismology nor of using [C/N] to determine ages on the red giant branch. Radiometric dating has also been used. Korandder (talk) 23:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article misses lots of methods.

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At first, i noted asteroseismology is missing, but the section above reveals many more methods are missing. 21 Andromedae (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply