• Yoblyblob (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, I took note of that during the drive. I may have tried to do too much too soon into being granted the permission, but would like to think I take a lot more care now during reviews. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 01:23, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

• CherryPie94 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

The sourcing provided here does not appear to meet WP:NORG, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Can you provide sources that establish the notability of this organization? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

I agree some of the sourcing used is WP:CORPTRIV — the foundation has extensive coverage in Korea. I've just added some stronger pieces. The pre/post interview text in this Forbes feature is one with significant secondary coverage. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done NORG requires secondary coverage. Those are all primary news stories. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm okay without the role, or a trial if possible, but can't WP:SECONDARY sources rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them? Tech42 Donga demonstrate. I will admit this article is hard to find excellent secondary sources for because there just are so many about the organization. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@Voorts: The distinction between primary and secondary sources is sometimes debateable, but by the standards set out in WP:NORG, the news stories seem to fit -- that guideline explicitly says that an NYT article, a blog post and a Forbes profile would be considered secondary, while the text of a court filing would be primary. However, WP:ENDURING may apply regardless. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 14:42, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Onatic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 23:59, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

• Luxtaythe2nd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (_{Talk to me...}) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Why is citypopulation.de a reliable source? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Shahnamk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia.

In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support.

Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:NONENG, "English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when they are available and of equal quality and relevance". For In the Mesh, did you search for English-language sources? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Also, it appears that you translated the article from fa:چرخدنده (کتاب) without attribution, which is required per Help:Translation#Licensing. Could you please repair the attribution for that article and any others that you translated from fa-wiki without attribution? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:15, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Sweetabena (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing.

I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles.

I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role.

I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Sweetabena: I’ve gone through some of the articles you’ve created, including Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy. I noticed that these pages have been tagged for AI-generated content (WP:LLM). Could you please clarify this? Additionally, the article on Bright Owusu has a notability issue. Have you made any efforts to address or fix that? I also noticed that most of your articles are about politicians or MPs, which is generally a relatively easier area for a New Page Patroller. Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Jannatulbaqi,

Thanks for your response and for reviewing my request.

I've now gone through the articles you mentioned; Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style.

Regarding Bright Owusu, I realized that the subject is better known publicly as “C-Confion,” which is the name used in most reliable sources. I initially created a redirect page under that name, and since C-Confion better reflects WP:COMMONNAME, I’ve submitted a technical move request at WP:RM/TR to move the article accordingly.

While many of my articles are in the political space, I’ve focused on that area because it's typically easier to demonstrate notability. That said, I’m open to expanding into other areas and continuing to improve the range and quality of my contributions.

I appreciate your time and consideration, and I remain committed to constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you so much.Sweetabena (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

I don't think answers the implicit question, Sweetabena, which is "did you use AI" in the first place? Also, I confess parts of your comment seem a little LLM-y particularly and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style, although the misuse of the semicolon before the list of articles looks like a legit human error. Please divulge the extent to which you have used AI in your editing. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 00:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cremastra Yes, I have used ChatGPT to assist with drafting some article content. However, I review, fact-check, and revise it to ensure it maintains a human-authored standard and aligns with Wikipedia's content policies. I see AI as a support tool, not a replacement for editorial responsibility.Sweetabena (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done AI use and using AI to respond to concerns about AI use are both very concerning. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:17, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• AdobongPogi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi ^{masarap 🍛} 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment: AdobongPogi, your article Popo (film) need to address this. Administrators will flag that and it might affect your request as autopatrolled. But i will Weak Support for this. ROY is WAR Talk! (Non-administrator comment) 08:22, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

• AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Had my first AP request declined due to my poor judgement with notability of railway stations. I've learned from that mistake (and cleaned up after myself), and I've created articles like Expo 2025 pavilions (Although this was a collaboration with Epicgenius) and Magical Girl Witch Trials since my request was declined. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Link to their first request. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 00:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• GregariousMadness (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I've created a large number of My Little Pony and mathematics articles. I have over 6,700 edits and will continue to edit for as long as I can. I'm requesting autopatrol permissions so that the NPP backlog will be less cluttered with my articles. I believe I've demonstrated a solid understanding of the policies and guidelines with my articles, particularly with my coverage of various aspects of the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 17:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

• Queenofboston (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have created more than 25 articles, over several years. I learnt over time to understand the notability criteria well. My new pages do not require attention from patrollers. Only one page I created is marked as deleted (it was recreated under a slightly different name). I have overall over 1000 edits. Thank you for the consideration. Queenofboston (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@Queenofboston: Thank you for your contributions. Spot-checking one of your creations at random, Michelle Meagher, indicated direct copying from a source (report) and non-neutral prose ("Meagher was confronted with a crisis of consciousness", also closely paraphrased from the source). I'll leave a message on your talk page with more information about copyright considerations on Wikipedia, and I would recommend reading about the encyclopedic tone that should be used in articles. For these reasons, I don't think autopatrolled would be appropriate for you at the moment. Please let me know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@TechnoSquirrel69 the article you singled out for copyright issues was published in 2024. The Michelle Meagher Wikipedia entry was created by me in 2023 with the contested phrase in it. So the 2024 article copied the 2023 Wikipedia page not the other way round. I did not infringe any copyright of the 2024 article as it did not exist at the time of the page creation. Queenofboston (talk) 18:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm not seeing a date on the Green European Journal page, although it was only archived in the Wayback Machine in 2024. Even leaving that aside, though, there remain the issues of neutrality and close paraphrasing.

I looked at another one of your creations for more information. Your most recent one, Aline Blankertz, has statements without citations, and doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability — the existing sources are either primary sources, like interviews or podcast appearances, or don't have significant coverage of the subject. However, I will note that I found no copyright-related issues here. I maintain that it would be beneficial for your creations to get a once-over from new pages patrol. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:52, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

The information you flagged as missing citation was contained in the sources cited immediately prior, I now double-cite them in the two instances you flagged.

I am not saying that my pages cannot be improved but my pages bring additions to Wikipedia. I focus on women as it is an objective of Wikipedia to re-balance the coverage away from a bias favoring pages of men Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, I believe this is valuable contribution. There are profiles of Aline Blankertz in leading German media outlets, only one source is a podcast and it is produced by an established German media outlet, that is a valid source in my understanding, it is not a podcast produced by the subject. None of the sources in that article are authored by the subject of the article. My pages do not have copyrights issues, as now clarified. I use some sources in foreign languages but it is not the policy of Wikipedia to disregard or downgrade sources that are in foreign languages for purposes of notability. Queenofboston (talk) 09:13, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

• OceanGunfish (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have created 38 articles in the last year and a half, with 0 deletions. I have brought two of my most recent five creations to GA status. I am very careful to make sure every statement in my creations is properly sourced and I hope to help reduce the workload at NPP. OceanGunfish (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

+1 (Non-administrator comment) Spot-checked. Seems a good candidate. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:01, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• MallardTV (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have, in my time on Wikipedia, created numerous new articles. I do admit that a decent number of them have been species articles, but I make sure that they are all expanded from a stub if possible. I have waited for a while to request this, and I do think that it is finally time. MallardTV ^{Talk to me!} 15:42, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

• Masohpotato (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting autopatrolled rights to decrease NPP backlog. I have created 400+ articles, and have demonstrated knowledge of notability guidelines throughout 3 and a half years editing. I have not edited for about a month, but plan to get back into Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Masohpotato (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

• Memer15151 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

After a few months break, I have decided to become active on the English Wikipedia once more. In this new period of activity, I look forward to creating new articles of high quality. As a New page patroller myself, I know how much of a backlog there is. Since I have created a considerable amount of clean articles in the past (mostly related to history, geography and entomology), and am hoping to make many more in the future, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to slightly ease the work of patrollers such as myself. Thank you! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 21:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

• Greenleader(2) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have created 46 pages currently, and in my more recent Wikipedia editing experience have focused largely on creating high quality and well sourced pages on politicians who automatically pass WP:NPOL, as well as having created pages on political parties, figures, and elections that clearly meet other or general notability guidelines. Having this permission would therefore help free up the workload of new page reviewers. Greenleader(2) (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Hteiktinhein (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am returning to request full rights after the three-month trial period expired. During the trial period, I encountered no issues and successfully created many articles to contribute to Women in Red/Missing articles by nationality/Myanmar. Hteiktinhein (talk) 07:53, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• B33tleMania12 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

This user was discovered through the New Pages Feed. They are an editor who has learned a lot about good practices in creating articles and are consistent in working within the bounds of the notability guideline for species. The only mark against them is that many of these pages are created without a talk page. The vast majority are stubs, but that is to be expected for many of the subject species, and enough information is provided in most cases to allow for identification. -- Reconrabbit 13:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 13:50, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) User has created over 2k articles, but these articles are short, some are single-sentence, some are double, in a nutshell, they're too short for them to really be able to demonstrate that they could write up a full-fledge article without issues like copy vio or close paraphrasing–which requires an editor to write, say start article, or even stubs that are over 90% rating (10% remaining to become a start-class); this is just my analysis. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:20, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Zxm92 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I do a lot of work adding and improving short descriptions, and I also spend time fixing typos and cleaning up citations.

AWB would make these routine, non-controversial edits much faster, and I’ll be sure to review every change before saving to keep everything in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Thanks for considering! Zxm92 (talk) 03:31, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Thilio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• OwenBlacker (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have recently completed Wikimedia UK's "train the trainer" programme and will be running and facilitating editing events for both the Wikimedia UK Chapter and Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 11:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• SecretName101 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I occasionally upload files, and would appreciate being able to remedy any errant titles on my own in the instances that a mis-spelling might occur. I do not intend to make overly-broad use of this right; rather plan to use it sparely to quickly-repair any such necessary issues as they might errantly occur. SecretName101 (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@SecretName101: Have you made any other rename requests than this one? ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 05:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Rahmatula786 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been patrolling nepal related articles for months. In recent times we can see many COI, UPE and promotional editing issues. Being a local, i have advantages while dealing with such cases. I have learned from my earlier mistake and ready to contribute. Recently had contributed to reduce AFC backlog JUNE 2025 and earned barnstar. Rahmatula786 (talk) 00:57, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3][4]). — MusikBot ^talk 01:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done You didn't disclose that your request for NPR has been declined twice in the past 3 months and you haven't addressed the concerns raised in the last rejections. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:17, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

I am aware of the fact that bot mention about decline within 3 months. In my previous request i had mentioned it that my request was declined. So not intended to hide it. I mentioned about learning from my mistakes. I am actively patrolling nepal related articles. And if you find any problems in that since last decline, plz let me know. You can watch my CSD, AFD, and tags i have put. Plz have a look here how I detected COI in a reviewed article. Draft talk:Jagadiswor Narsingh KC.

i just wanted to request for September month NPP right for backlog. If I can’t do good. I won’t request again.

I am happy to wait and improve if you say. Rahmatula786 (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Cactusisme (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

My NPPR is going to expire soon and would like to renew it, likely to permanent. I know this is early, but I have some major exams next week and won't edit much (and when I do, I probably will forget about this). Really sorry. Thanks, Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 08:41, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 08:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Cactusisme, could you please comment and reflect on your checkuser block from June 2024-January 2025? While technically speaking you've cleared the prerequisite of having a clean block log for the past six months, I will say that it's rather unusual to be able to regain the community's trust enough for advanced permissions following a checkuser block in such a short timespan. Courtesy ping to admins that have been involved, Sohom Datta, Spicy, PhilKnight _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I found Cactusisme's track record post their block to be pretty good (which led me to grant the right) and saw the grant of RB and PCR as a recognition of the fact that the communities confidence in Cactus was on the path towards restoration. Sohom (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I was blocked for sock puppetry from June 2024 to Jan 2025.when I first started editing Wikipedia, I thought it was just a sandbox where you can do anything in. However, soon after the block, I decided to read up more Wp policies which resulted in me gaining more knowledge of the purpose of Wikipedia. Since the block, I have been contributing and learning in Simple EN Wiki, where I hold patroller (patrol and autopatrol) and rollbacker perms. After appealing my block here, I was granted an unblock by PhilKnight after consultation with Spicy (the full discussion can be seen in my archives). Over the months after my block, I have contributed to creating redirects for new users as well as helping people. I have also been focussed on reverting vandalism (therefore I got rollbacker and PCR). Thanks, Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:44, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Như Gây Mê (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, my NPR rights will expire on September 1, and I would like to renew it to clean up the backlogs next month. Thanks! Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 15:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 16:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

extended until the end of September, as you only appear to have reviewed one article, aside from a handful tagged with CSD  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:24, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Safety Cap (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been very active in patrolling for vandalism and would like to help out by reviewing new pages to ensure they are appropriate content (notable, not attack, etc) and help new authors by offering suggestions for improvement if needed. — Safety Cap ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (talk) 19:59, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done for the month of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:29, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Scoria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to help the backlog by reviewing pages. See my AFD stats for my experience in deletion processes. Scoria (talk) 03:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done until the end of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:31, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• AstrooKai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I participated in the last May 2025 backlog drive, and I want to participate again in the upcoming September 2025 drive. AstrooKai (Talk) 15:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Track record looks good,  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:08, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• EatingCarBatteries (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to help go through the backlog. I've had experience going through newpages without the permission, typically doing minor improvements such MOS stuff and categorizing or tagging them (which is what this is about). I enjoy finding forgotten articles, because those are the ones that typically need the most improvement. EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 06:14, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done through September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:12, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Vgbyp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have some experience in editing and I hope my knowledge and understanding of the Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines are adequate to perform the task of new page patrolling. I would like to join the September backlog drive and that's why I am requesting this role for that period. Thanks! Vgbyp (talk) 07:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done through September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:14, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Aydoh8 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

My NPR rights expire in a week and I would like to extend them. I'm a prolific AfC reviewer (not as prolific as Qcne though) and I would also like to participate in the upcoming NPR backlog. Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 10:36, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot ^talk 10:40, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Reviews seem mostly ok, but there were a few accepted articles that were later deleted (e.g. Vuk Topličević, GFL 2 (2025)) and at least one where signs of COI were not addressed (Isadora Petrauskas). I think another trial run through the month of September is appropriate,  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:25, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Mrfoogles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I was granted NPP rights a while ago, but they expired in July, and I'd like to have them again so I can look through new articles when I feel like it, and maybe participate in the upcoming drive. I have a lot of AfD experience and have now accumulated a good amount of NPP experience as well -- hopefully I've done a pretty good job reviewing articles. I have also created a number of new articles, mostly when I'm surprised Wikipedia doesn't have an article on something yet. As for interacting with new editors, I've spent some time on the Teahouse and talk pages, so I have some experience. So, I'd like to apply for rights again. Mrfoogles (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Oh, and I should clarify I'm also applying because I plan to dabble in AfC a bit (also have some experience in that if I remember correctly), and this permission lets you do both. Mrfoogles (talk) 16:39, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done, past track record looks good _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Sariel Xilo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I received an automated "Invitation to join New pages patrol" back in Feb 2024 but didn't have the time to get involved. I've created just over 50 articles, done the occasional WP:HEY to improve articles at AfD and have spent a lot of time finding/adding sources. I'm requesting temporary new page reviewer rights to participate in the September backlog drive. I figured a backlog drive is good way to figure out if this is an area I'd like to spend my wiki time more long term. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done through the end of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:25, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Dionysodorus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to request this user right, so that I can contribute to reducing the backlog. I have been an editor since 2011, and in all my edits have always been committed to improving Wikipedia through copyediting, adding information, updating pages, reverting unconstructive edits, and so forth. I have sometimes contributed to AfD discussions, as well as sometimes closing RfCs and other discussions in order to help reduce the backlog at CR, and I have a strong general knowledge of policy. I have sometimes created articles, which have always passed review. Dionysodorus (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done through the end of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:27, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• WeWake (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I acknowledge that I have reviewed the NPP reviewer requirements, guidelines, and relevant policies before making this request. The upcoming backlog drives provides a good opportunity for assisting in new page reviews along with additional oversight (due to re-reviews) and enagement with the community. I had a request declined a few months ago as I had just started to contribute again after a period of inactivity, but I hope my contributions since then speak for my continued engagement. WeWake (talk) 21:26, 24 August 2025 (UTC)— WeWake (talk) 21:26, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done through the end of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:28, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• DandelionAndBurdock (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'd like to try this out for the September drive. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 08:51, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done through the end of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:52, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• MWFwiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Requesting renewal of NPR permissions a bit early, so that I may take-part in the backlog drive without interruption. Thank you, and I'd be happy to answer any questions deemed-necessary. MWFwiki (talk) 20:32, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 20:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

track record looks good, with reasoned AfD rationales making up for an otherwise somewhat low match rate.  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:33, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Ckfasdf (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'd like to request NPR rights to participate in the upcoming September 2025 drive and help reduce the backlog. Ckfasdf (talk) 08:32, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done, tenure of edits is long and strong enough that I think we can skip the typical trial. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Cardboard Moose (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'd like to be involved in the September Backlog Drive. I'm mostly involved with the Check Wikipedia WikiProject, so I have quite a lot of experience doing more back-end work, and I've created a couple of pages. I believe I have a good understanding of content policies and quality control. Moose (talk) 12:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done until the end of September as a trial run, after which you may reapply _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:49, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• WeatherWriter (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been editing for a long time, with nearly now 34,000 contributions to EN-wiki and over 41,000 total contributions across other projects (like the Commons, with hundreds of uploads). I have also done 371 page moves, primarily draftspace to mainspace. Honestly, having the page move permission would stop me having to request deletion of redirects, only to wait several hours with no page mover checking the non-controversial speedy delete category, and just decide to do a new name to get a draft into mainspace. It would make editing a little more convenient for me and also take an extra possible task off administrator workloads. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:30, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Page movers can't delete redirects, they can suppress creating ones when moving however. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:35, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Oh. What perm do I need to request to delete a redirect prior to a draftspace --> mainspace move? I'm still requesting the page mover right, since with it, I could always do round-robin to accomplish what I described above. But, is there a specific perm that allows for the redirect deletion, or is that only administrators? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:46, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Only administrators currently can delete existing redirects as far as I know. Page movers can move over those redirects if they don't have significant history though. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:50, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Gotcha! Hopefully an administrator believes granting me the page mover perm fully will be beneficial to Wikipedia for round-robin moves. I was previously granted it on a three-month temporary basis. Thank you for clearing up my question! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Normal users can delete a redirect, if the page they're moving to is a redirect back to its title, and only has a single page history (WP:MOR). JuniperChill (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Clear use for the perm. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

• JuniperChill (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I remember requesting the right at the last day of 2024, and suddenly had to take a break from Wikipedia until June. I totally forgot I only had this right for two months and thought I would lose it after 12 months of inactivity. But anyway, I am requesting this tool to help out at WP:RM/TR (and closing RMs) seeing I made a few RM/TR requests and performed some since my wikibreak. JuniperChill (talk) 22:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Thank you for helping out with RMs, however none of your RM 4 noms this year resulted in a move, which is a bit concerning for me. However, I will note that the two RM discussions participated in (that were not your RM nom), your view was in alignment with consensus. TiggerJay (talk) 23:40, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Although the RMs of Talk:Sun Haven and Talk:Melbourne Airport (suburb) were successful. I also made a bold move of Virgin Trains (open-access operator) by adding a hyphen. and have requested an RMTR move of Kent Station to Kent station without being reverted. JuniperChill (talk) 00:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I apologize for the oversight, your RM for the airport did not show up in the toolforge search linked above. I'll defer to an admin to further process your request. I will say this is not a strict object, but simply a comment on observed activity. TiggerJay (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 2 months. Since you didn't use this improperly the first time (when I granted it previously), I'll give you the same opportunity now. Since you only used it once before your wikibreak, I would like to see more of a track record before extending it indefinitely. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Rickyurs (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

With 7 years experience as an editor, I am familiar with the various use of rights. Presently I have made around 85,000 edits and created 1044 articles in the main space. I feel the need of Page mover rights to deal with redirects and disregard of naming conventions. I assure you that I will not misuse the feature. Thanks in anticipation. Rickyurs (talk) 04:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done You don't really have a history of making those kinds of page moves and have very limited RM/TR and RM history. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

• CNMall41 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I fight a lot of SPAM, UPE, and SOCKS which often leads me to move pages to draft space from main space. Having page mover will help me suppress the redirect and save admins time. I am not sure if this will help with accepting drafts which have a redirect title occupying the main space, but I have reviewed over 4,000 page at AfC so it would be helpful with that as well. CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

This would be useful for publishing drafts via round-robin swap rather than {{db-afc-move}} (and for draftification). However, WP:PMCRITERIA#4 isn't satisfied due to a 36hr EW pblock (not for 3RR).

• @Ivanvector: Do you have any continued concern about edit warring given CNMall41's reply about the pblock you imposed?
• @CNMall41: Have you looked through the Wikipedia:Page mover policy page? (Mainly the § Redirect suppression criteria, § Round-robin page moves, § Conduct expectations, § Guidelines for granting, and § Criteria for revocation.)

~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 17:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

@SilverLocust:, Thanks for the question. I did review and know there was a 3RR in the last six months and won't give my opinion on it other than it was correct on its face. Only block in my 11 years here and I took the last line of PMCRITERIA to mean you have the right to grant it despite, and also have the right to deny even if I met all those requirements. If you would prefer me to wait until that period has ended I can do so. Was just trying to help save others some time. Ether way, thanks for consideration. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

When seeking an exception, you should disclose that you don't meet the guidelines. (That you didn't disclose that, along with your uncertainty that this would help with accepting drafts, made me question whether you had read relevant parts of the page.) ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 18:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

You are correct. I should not have assumed that you would assume. Definitely was not hiding anything but I should have pointed it out since it was one of the criteria. That is 100% on me. The question I had about whether or not it would be relevant was to do with moves to the mainspace where a redirect already occupies the title. My understanding is that I would still need an administrator to delete that redirect so I can move. Is that correct? --CNMall41 (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

No, as I tried to explain in my first sentence, a page mover can swap a draft with a redirect. See, for example, Draft:Ben Mayes (cricketer)Draft:Ben Mayes (cricketer) (revision history), which was swapped with Ben Mayes (cricketer). ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 03:49, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Well, I read it a few times and for some reason the wires in my brain are not lining up. I think it would be best to withdraw this request as I do not want a tool that I do not fully understand. For some reason I cannot even get my head around the example you provided. I apologize for wasting your time here. Maybe in the future it will click and I will be back. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

All right. I was still considering the request, depending on Inanvector not expressing objections.  Request withdrawn for the bot. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 05:41, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

And I do appreciate that. I also hope there's no hard feelings for wasting your time. I just had to self-reflect on it a bit and realized I may not understand it as much as I initially thought. Nothing to do with the block. I wasn't happy about the whole circumstance surrounding it, but it is what it is and I would agree that it was a bright line block. I just think that it is better to not have a tool until I fully understand it. I'll likely be back. Cheers! --CNMall41 (talk) 08:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

I think I missed the window of usefulness for feedback here but since I was pinged, no I would not have concerns for pagemover regarding the pblock. The article was a clusterfuck, and anyway I don't really see the connection between the userright and an edit warring pblock anyway. I haven't taken the time to understand the IP viewer right (silly thing for a checkuser to say, I know) so I won't comment; it seems to have been separately requested and granted anyway. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:13, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• WeatherWriter (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am an active editor (over 34,000 contributions), familiar with all the necessary policies, including copyright guidelines. Pending changes is currently in place on an article I edit as well as monitor (Tornadoes of 2025), due to frequent vandalism from two LTAs (one of which is WP:LTA/A5) both of which I have sock-reported dozens of times in the last few years. Perm would allow me to accept or decline edits to the article as well as any other weather-related articles that get pending changes protected in the future. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 11:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Funny enough, I just SPI-reported several LTA accounts that I discovered after requesting Pending Changes Protection on a different weather article. I’m mentioning this here since it might show another reason why it would be helpful for me to have this review perm. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:03, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done asilvering (talk) 03:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Krsnaquli (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• Thilio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reasons why I am requesting rollback rights: Some registered editors or some IP editors know what they are doing is wrong, but they are still doing it adding wrong information about BLPs, changing names or birth years, months or days from right to wrong, and adding nonsensical contents just to hurt Wikipedia. I am against all of that. I'm requesting rollback rights because I am fighting vandalism and I won't stop not now not ever. The rollback tool will help me fight vandalism with confidence because some editors know what they are doing is 100% wrong (vandalism) but they just keep adding and adding. With the rollback tool rights, I can undo that in the blink of an eye. I understand that rollback is only for obvious vandalism or disruptive edits and not for content disputes. I will make sure I use the tool responsibly in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Thanks in advance. 🐍 Thilio🤖 13:21, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

• MakaylaHippo1998 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have made many mainspace edits and have started using the "Twinkle" feature regularly since my last request about two months ago. Feel more confident in this request. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot ^talk 06:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

• JohnDavies9612 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I have read about Wikipedia:Rollback. I have understood many things. There are many vandalism activities that are done every day. I want to fight against vandalism and monitor every movement. I will try to do my best for everything. Thank you JohnDavies9612 (talk) 12:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot ^talk 12:30, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

• Coldupnorth (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Long-time editor but occasionally coming across vandalism or unconstructive edits that are often more than undoing just one single edit. I know I could copy and paste an early copy from the edit history but that seems counter-intuitive. While I would be honest and admit I would not likely use the function everyday, I would find the rollback option helpful occasionally. I have not been in edit-warring and would also make the case that I have demonstrated an ability to distinguish well-intentioned edits with minor issues from unconstructive vandalism over many years. Thank you. Coldupnorth (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC) Coldupnorth (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@Coldupnorth You can actually use "undo" for more than one edit, and it's more versatile than rollback. When viewing a page history, use the radio buttons to select the last good version and the current version, click "Compare selected revisions" to view the diff, and then click on the undo link. If you enable WP:TWINKLE, you can also just view the last good diff and click "[restore this version]" up at the top, plus it automates the process of leaving a message for the editor you're reverting. Rollback is only needed for rapid reverting where you don't need an edit summary, or for using an external program such as WP:HUGGLE for high-speed anti-vandalism work, and probably not required if you're just occasionally coming across vandalism or unconstructive edits.

Also looking at your recent edits, it seems like you're forgetting to consistently sign the messages that you leave on people's talk pages. Twinkle, as mentioned above, automates this, but if you're manually placing a message always remember to sign it by including ~~~~ at the end. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:48, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• GlorpK4 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Been doing a bit of anti-vandalism work in my spare time and I want to try out AV. Thx ✦GLORPK4✦  | 📡 03:57, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Rht bd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}