Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
 | This group editnotice (for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and its subpages) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
 | Inclusion criteria For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than two qualifying participants for RSN discussions where the source's name is in the section heading, and no fewer than three qualifying participants for all other discussions. Qualifying participants are editors who make at least one comment on the source's reliability. |
| This group editnotice (for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and its subpages) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
 | Edit summary Please include a descriptive edit summary with your changes. This makes it easier for other editors to audit the page history. |
| This group editnotice (for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and its subpages) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
 | Instructions Please refer to the instructions (WP:RSPI) for help editing the list. Feel free to ask for help on the talk page if you get stuck. The list is structured as a table with multiple templates, split into the following editable subpages (as the result of a 2024 discussion): |