The Thomas–Fermi (TF) model,[1][2] named after Llewellyn Thomas and Enrico Fermi, is a quantum mechanical theory for the electronic structure of many-body systems developed semiclassically shortly after the introduction of the Schrödinger equation.[3] It stands separate from wave function theory as being formulated in terms of the electronic density alone and as such is viewed as a precursor to modern density functional theory. The Thomas–Fermi model is correct only in the limit of an infinite nuclear charge. Using the approximation for realistic systems yields poor quantitative predictions, even failing to reproduce some general features of the density such as shell structure in atoms and Friedel oscillations in solids. It has, however, found modern applications in many fields through the ability to extract qualitative trends analytically and with the ease at which the model can be solved. The kinetic energy expression of Thomas–Fermi theory is also used as a component in more sophisticated density approximation to the kinetic energy within modern orbital-free density functional theory.

Working independently, Thomas and Fermi used this model in 1927 to approximate the distribution of electrons in an atom. Although electrons are distributed nonuniformly in an atom, the approximation was made that in each small volume element ΔV (i.e. locally), the electrons are distributed uniformly. The electron density can still vary from one volume element to the next.

Kinetic energy

edit

For a small volume element ΔV, and for the atom in its ground state, we can fill out a spherical momentum-space volume VF up to the Fermi momentum pF, and thus[4]   where   is the position vector of a point in ΔV.

The corresponding phase-space volume is  

In the phase-space volume ΔVph, the electrons are distributed uniformly with density 2/h3 where h is the Planck constant.[5] The number of electrons in ΔVph is  

The electron number density in real space is this number per volume ΔV, and hence   The fraction of electrons at   that have momentum between p and p + dp is  

Using the classical expression for the kinetic energy of an electron with mass me, the kinetic energy per unit volume at   for the electrons of the atom is   In the last step, the previous expression relating   to   has been used, and  

Integrating the kinetic energy per unit volume   over all space results in the total kinetic energy of the electrons:[6]  

This result shows that the total kinetic energy of the electrons can be expressed in terms of only the spatially varying electron density   according to the Thomas–Fermi model. As such, they were able to calculate the energy of an atom using this expression for the kinetic energy combined with the classical expressions for the nuclear–electron and electron–electron Coulomb interactions (which can both also be represented in terms of the electron density).

Potential energies

edit

The potential energy of an atom's electrons, due to the electric attraction of the positively charged nucleus is   where   is the potential energy of an electron at   that is due to the electric field of the nucleus. For the case of a nucleus centered at   with charge Ze, where Z is a positive integer, and e is the elementary charge,  

The potential energy of the electrons due to their mutual electric repulsion is  

This is the Hartree approximation to the electron-electron interaction. A more refined calculation would take into account the antisymmetry of the many-body wave function and leads to the so-called exchange interaction.

Total energy

edit

The total energy of the electrons is the sum of their kinetic and potential energies:[7]  

Thomas–Fermi equation

edit

In order to minimize the energy E while keeping the number of electrons constant, we add a Lagrange multiplier term of the form   to E. Letting the variation with respect to n vanish then gives the equation   which must hold wherever   is nonzero.[8][9] If we define the total potential   by   then[10]   If the nucleus is assumed to be a point with charge Ze at the origin, then   and   will both be functions only of the radius   and we can define φ(r) by   where a0 is the Bohr radius.[11] From using the above equations together with Gauss's law, φ(r) can be seen to satisfy the Thomas–Fermi equation[12]  

For chemical potential μ = 0, this is a model of a neutral atom, with an infinite charge cloud where   is everywhere nonzero and the overall charge is zero, while for μ < 0, it is a model of a positive ion, with a finite charge cloud and positive overall charge. The edge of the cloud is where φ(r) = 0.[13] For μ > 0, it can be interpreted as a model of a compressed atom, so that negative charge is squeezed into a smaller space. In this case the atom ends at the radius r where /dr = φ/r.[14][15]

Inaccuracies and improvements

edit

Although this was an important first step, the Thomas–Fermi equation is limited in accuracy because the method does not attempt to represent the exchange energy of an atom as a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle (electrons with parallel spin cannot appear at the same place, reducing their Coulomb repulsion). A term for the exchange energy was added by Dirac in 1930,[16] which significantly improved its accuracy.[17] Wigner computed in 1934 an approximate form of the so-called correlation energy which captures the interaction among electrons with opposite spins.[18]

However, the Thomas–Fermi–Dirac theory remained rather inaccurate for most applications. The largest source of error was in the representation of the kinetic energy, followed by the errors in the exchange energy, and due to the complete neglect of electron correlation.

In 1962, Edward Teller showed that Thomas–Fermi theory cannot describe molecular bonding – the energy of any molecule calculated with TF theory is higher than the sum of the energies of the constituent atoms. More generally, the total energy of a molecule decreases when the bond lengths are uniformly increased.[19][20][21][22] This can be overcome by improving the expression for the kinetic energy.[23]

One notable historical improvement to the Thomas–Fermi kinetic energy is the Weizsäcker (1935) correction,[24]   which is the other building block of orbital-free density functional theory. The problem with the inaccurate modelling of the kinetic energy in the Thomas–Fermi model, as well as other orbital-free density functionals, is circumvented in Kohn–Sham density functional theory with a fictitious system of non-interacting electrons whose kinetic energy expression is known.

See also

edit

Further reading

edit
  • R. G. Parr and W. Yang (1989). Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-509276-9.
  • N. H. March (1992). Electron Density Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-470525-8.
  • N. H. March (1983). "1. Origins – The Thomas–Fermi Theory". In S. Lundqvist; N. H. March (eds.). Theory of The Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Plenum Press. ISBN 978-0-306-41207-3.
  • Feynman, R. P.; Metropolis, N.; Teller, E. (1949-05-15). "Equations of State of Elements Based on the Generalized Fermi-Thomas Theory". Physical Review. 75 (10): 1561–1573. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1561. ISSN 0031-899X.

References

edit
  1. ^ Thomas, L. H. (1927). "The calculation of atomic fields". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 23 (5): 542–548. Bibcode:1927PCPS...23..542T. doi:10.1017/S0305004100011683. S2CID 122732216.
  2. ^ Fermi, Enrico (1927). "Un Metodo Statistico per la Determinazione di alcune Prioprietà dell'Atomo". Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei. 6: 602–607.
  3. ^ Schrödinger, Erwin (December 1926). "An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules" (PDF). Physical Review. 28 (6): 1049–1070. Bibcode:1926PhRv...28.1049S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.28.1049. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2008-11-14.
  4. ^ March 1992, p. 24.
  5. ^ Parr and Yang 1989, p. 47.
  6. ^ March 1983, p. 5, Eq. 11.
  7. ^ March 1983, p. 6, Eq. 15.
  8. ^ March 1983, p. 6, Eq. 18.
  9. ^ Elliott H. Lieb, "A Brief Review of Thomas-Fermi Theory", (2.2).
  10. ^ March 1983, p. 7, Eq. 20.
  11. ^ March 1983, p. 8, Eq. 22, 23.
  12. ^ March 1983, p. 8.
  13. ^ March 1983, pp. 9–12.
  14. ^ March 1983, p. 10, Figure 1.
  15. ^ Feynman, Metropolis, and Teller 1949, p. 1562.
  16. ^ Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). "Note on Exchange Phenomena in the Thomas Atom". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 26 (3): 376–385. Bibcode:1930PCPS...26..376D. doi:10.1017/S0305004100016108.
  17. ^ Sanyuk, Valerii I.; Sukhanov, Alexander D. (2003-09-01). "Dirac in 20th century physics: a centenary assessment". Physics-Uspekhi. 46 (9): 937–956. doi:10.1070/PU2003v046n09ABEH001165. ISSN 1063-7869. S2CID 250754932.
  18. ^ Wigner, Eugene P. (1934). "On the Interaction of Electrons in Metals". Physical Review. 46 (11): 1002–11. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.46.1002.
  19. ^ Teller, E. (1962). "On the Stability of molecules in the Thomas–Fermi theory". Reviews of Modern Physics. 34 (4): 627–631. Bibcode:1962RvMP...34..627T. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.34.627.
  20. ^ Balàzs, N. (1967). "Formation of stable molecules within the statistical theory of atoms". Physical Review. 156 (1): 42–47. Bibcode:1967PhRv..156...42B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.156.42.
  21. ^ Lieb, Elliott H.; Simon, Barry (1977). "The Thomas–Fermi theory of atoms, molecules and solids". Advances in Mathematics. 23 (1): 22–116. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(77)90108-6.
  22. ^ Parr and Yang 1989, pp. 114–115.
  23. ^ Parr and Yang 1989, p. 127.
  24. ^ Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1935). "Zur Theorie der Kernmassen". Zeitschrift für Physik (in German). 96 (7–8): 431–458. Bibcode:1935ZPhy...96..431W. doi:10.1007/BF01337700. S2CID 118231854.