User:AiDeveloper12/Artificial intelligence in education/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following: Is the source from a reliable publication? Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking. Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts. Is the source verifiable? In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source. Is the source independent of the subject? Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations. For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent. Is the source primary or secondary? Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content. Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge. Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia. If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines. If you're creating a new article, consider the following: Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about. Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations. Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement. Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully. Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully. If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert. Get Help

Bibliography

1. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9069875 Reviews AI applications like intelligent tutoring, personalized learning, and assessment, with a focus on trends and challenges.
2. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Analyzes AI’s potential to transform teaching, including adaptive learning and ethical concerns.
3. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education – Where Are the Gaps? https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 A systematic review of 146 studies on AI in higher education, identifying gaps in ethics and accessibility.
4. Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2022). The Promise and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
5. U.S. Department of Education (2023) – Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf Outlines AI’s potential in education, based on stakeholder input, with recommendations for implementation.
6. UNESCO (2021) – AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-Makers https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709Provides a global framework for integrating AI into education, addressing equity, ethics, and teacher training.
7. World Economic Forum. (2024). The Future of Learning: AI is Revolutionizing Education 4.0. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/04/future-learning-ai-revolutionizing-education-4-0/ Discusses AI’s role in enhancing equity, accessibility, and teacher efficiency in education.
8. Forbes. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Teachers’ Opinions on AI in the Classroom. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/education/it-and-tech/artificial-intelligence-in-school/ Summarizes a survey of 500 U.S. educators on AI’s benefits and concerns.
9. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., & Hong, Y. (2023). Ethical Considerations in AI-Based Education Systems: A Review. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w Examines ethical issues like bias, privacy, and fairness in AIEd systems.
10. Xu, W., Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021 https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5 Focuses on STEM based education
11. University of Illinois (2024) AI in Schools: Pros and Cons https://education.illinois.edu/about/news-events/news/article/2024/10/24/ai-in-schools--pros-and-cons
12. Harvard Graduate School of Education (2023). Embracing Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/usable-knowledge/23/07/embracing-artificial-intelligence-classroom
13. Ofosu-Ampong, Kingsley., Acheampong, Bryan. & Amankwah - Sarfo, Fred. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in Education: Trust, Innovativeness and Psychological Need of Students https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372787378_Acceptance_of_Artificial_Intelligence_ChatGPT_in_Education_Trust_Innovativeness_and_Psychological_Need_of_Students This study examines student acceptance of AI tools like ChatGPT, focusing on trust and psychological needs. It’s ideal for sections on student perspectives and AI adoption barriers.
14. Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2023). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. https://telrp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 Examines AI’s effects on higher education pedagogy, administration, and student outcomes.
15. Robert., Jenay. (2024). (2024). The Future of AI in Higher Education https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2024/2024-educause-ai-landscape-study/the-future-of-ai-in-higher-education
16. Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric mapping analysis. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/6/584
17. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
18. Selwyn, N. (2022). The Future of AI and Education: Some Critical Reflections. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12532
19. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2023). Generative AI in Education: Opportunities and Challenges. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1389644.pdf
20. Park University. (2025). AI in Education: The Rise of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. https://www.park.edu/blog/ai-in-education-the-rise-of-intelligent-tutoring-systems/ The article discusses the rise of AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems in education, highlighting their ability to provide personalized learning

Outline of proposed changes

I will include the recent development and research made in Artificial Intelligence(AI) such as rise of generative chat bot usage in recent times and the new government guidelines. The article lacks sources that address content gaps, update outdated information, and improve readability and neutrality The articles and research papers mentioned in the bibliography will help in filling gap by that the current Wikipedia page on Article fails to contemplate.

The article also lacks a global perspective and new topics such as rise of ethical issues in AI. Topics such as data privacy, algorithm fairness, ethical concerns and challenges involved are missing here, which intend to include. Peer-reviewed research article will be used to summarize what the academic community has found most promising and most problematic in the field.

In addition I will restructure the article with more clarity and readability by reorganizing the headings and update the outdated technical terms. I will also delete outdated source of case studies, keeping the relevant ones and include latest trends. These changes will make the article more informative, balanced, and useful for readers seeking an up-to-date understanding of Artificial Intelligence in education.