User:AiDeveloper12/Artificial intelligence in education/Ramsrav Peer Review

General info

edit
Whose work are you reviewing?

Username: AiDeveloper12

Link to draft you're reviewing
Sandbox Draft – Artificial Intelligence in Education
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Current Wikipedia Article – Artificial Intelligence in Education

Evaluate the drafted changes

edit

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

1. Lead

Yes, the Lead talks about AI tools and issues like privacy and fairness, which matches the article well. But I think it should also include the history of AI, applications of AI, and future plans. Adding 2–3 lines about these missing parts can make the summary better.

2. Content

Yes, the content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. The content is not missing, but I suggest you add a little more about the history of AI, applications of AI, and future plans. It talks about fairness, new technology, and what students and teachers think.

3. Tone and balance

Yes, the article is written in a fair way. It talks about both the good and bad sides of AI in education. It doesn’t try to make the reader choose one side. It explains how AI is helping but also shows problems like bias and privacy. I think it is balanced and shares views from students, teachers, and different countries.

4. Sources and references

Yes, the article uses good and trusted sources like UNESCO and U.S. government departments and some peer-reviewed papers. Most of the sources are new (2020–2024). I checked some links and they were working. One source (Hamilton, Ilana) was repeated twice, so you can remove one.

5. Organization

Yes, I think the article is written in a good and clear way. I didn’t see any spelling mistakes, but in the Lead section, there is a grammar mistake: "he the changing landscape" should be corrected to "and the changing landscape." The article is well-organized.

6. Images and media

I didn’t see any images added. Adding a copyright-free image showing AI in classrooms or education could help readers understand better.