User:Jbradmitchell/Quantum game theory/BriceBusch Peer Review

Peer review Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: Lead Guiding questions: Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Content Guiding questions: Is the content added relevant to the topic? Is the content added up-to-date? Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Tone and Balance Guiding questions: Is the content added neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Sources and References Guiding questions: Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Are the sources current? Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Check a few links. Do they work? Organization Guiding questions: Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Are images well-captioned? Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? For New Articles Only If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Overall impressions Guiding questions: Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? What are the strengths of the content added? How can the content added be improved? Examples of good feedback A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting Additional Resources Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Jbradmitchell

Link to draft you're reviewing

Jbradmitchell/Quantum game theory

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Quantum game theory

Evaluate the drafted changes

Content

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, I think that these two examples will add nicely to the original article and it's examples. If you end up working on the Feasibility and Paradoxes sections I think that would improve it more as well.

• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - I think the final game seems to be missing some pieces to complete the final conclusion on the game, this could be fixed by adding the matrices as a visual for the reader.

Tone

• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - There doesn't seem to be any bias and this reads as a very academic and thought out explanation.

Sources and References

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes, you've cited two sources, which are listed, and they seem to be proper research articles into the topic.

• Check a few links. Do they work? - All links I checked are working properly!

_Organization

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - The text is structured clearly and I think the flow is easy to follow for someone new to the topic.

• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - Yes, "Q places a penny in a box and and they take turns" there are two ands in this sentence, but the rest seems well written.

^{Overall impressions}

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - I think that the examples added have better explained Quantum game theory to me, who was unfamiliar with the topic before, so I do think this article is better off now.
• What are the strengths of the content added? - The content added is simple enough to understand since the games are explained clearly. Also, the examples highlight different ways quantum strategies can influence fairness, either by giving an advantage (PQ Penny Flip Game) or by leveling the playing field (Quantum Card Game), showing that quantum strategies can both exploit and neutralize biases in games.

Additional Questions

• Are quantum strategies always superior, or only under specific conditions?
• Are there any historical or real-world applications where quantum game theory has been implemented or tested?

Overall, very good start and I'm excited to read the final product!

- Brice