User:Kiany.pv/Choose an Article

Article Selection

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Trypophobia: Article Evaluation:; Although it is rated as b-class low importance, I found it quite structured in terms of content and the composition was neutrally. The discussion page says why it was removed and other wikipedians give their opinion on how to improve it. Otherwise, in order to do what they ask is that they get a warning displayed before the image that causes the phobia appears and doesn’t affect people who have it. In addition to the image factor I think a section about the effects of not addressing this phobia correctly could improve the quality of the article and be considered so that it is not eliminated. Also add more data on psychological sources. Sources
Pipitone, R. N., Gallegos, B., & Walters, D. (2017). Physiological responses to trypophobic images and further scale validity of the trypophobia questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 66-68.https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-018-3245-5

Analysis

Article Evaluation:: The title of the article is relevant and has good content. Is rated in C-class importance on the projects quality scale. It was discussed on the talk page about reasons for the rating and I found that it doesn’t comply with some Wikipedia's policy. On the other hand, this article would find more use with a section on what cannot be analyzed.
Sources: Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2015). Content analysis. The international encyclopedia of political communication, 1-10.https://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/SkalskiVitae/SkalskiNeuendorfCajigas17.pdf

Physical therapy
Article Evaluation:
This article specifically finds that it is overloaded with information that does not go directly to the exact definition of what physical therapy is. This causes the reader to get lost so I think that if you change the current definition to a more accurate and concise one you might improve some aspects of the article.even include sections on different types of therapies.this article is rated as c-class mid importance and I'm sure that might be why.the truth is that there are other things that can be improved but I think that is paramount.
Sources: Jensen, G., Gwyer, J., Hack, L., & Shepard, K. (2007). Expertise in physical therapy practice. Elsevier Inc..https://creighton.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/expertise-in-physical-therapy-practice-2