User:Qrstw/sandbox

This is the user sandbox of Qrstw. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here. Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:User:Qrstw/sandbox}}).

Further information might be found on the talk page. }}

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{{1}}}|contribs]] · [[Special:Log/{{{1}}}|logs]]). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

[[Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of {{{1}}}]]

"Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of {{{1}}}" does not exist.
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts. (Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

{{{1}}}

This page in a nutshell: {{{1}}}

This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

{{{1}}}

N Deleted

This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

Shortcut WP:RFVWP:RFV

Drafting template

This page has been listed in Category:Requests for verification. It has been suggested that this article might not meet Wikipedia's core content policies Verifiability and/or No original research. If references are not cited within a month, the disputed information will be removed. If you can address this concern by sourcing please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you reference the article. The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for 30 days. (This message was added: 28 August 2025.) If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, improve the article so that it is acceptable according to Verifiability and/or No original research. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. (help, get involved!)

Suggested usage

• {{Requests for verification}} ({{RFV}}) should be used only on articles that have no sources. If there are Any references supporting the article then do not use {{RFV}} you may consider the {{Refimprove}} template which is appropriate for articles with some sources but not enough.
• Wikipedia Requests for verification {{RFV}} places articles in category:Requests for verification categorizing by date as {{Prod}} does.
• {{RFV}} should not be used on articles with history before January 1, 2007
• {{uw-unsor1}}, {{uw-unsor2}}, {{uw-unsor3}} should be placed on the talk page of the original editor of an unreferenced article that is tagged with {{RFV}}
• There should be at least 30 days between the tag and deletion

Deletion instructions

Before deleting the article, check:

1. Does the article history (first edit) begin after January 1, 2007?

• No, it begins before January 1, 2007: Remove the RFV tag and do not delete
• Yes: continue

2. Has the RFV tag been on the article for at least 30 days?

• No, it has been less then 30 days: stop and allow editors to improve the article
• Yes: continue

3. Are there any references, external links, or mentions of sources anywhere in the article?

• Yes: do not delete, remove the RFV tag, consider placing a {{Refimprove}} or other Citation and verifiability maintenance template
• No, there is nothing that could even remotely by considered a reference: continue.

4. Delete the article.

Rationale

It is appropriate to provide warning and allow time for editors to improve articles and add references. Current we have Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research and messages like "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources are likely to be deleted." when you open an edit screen to make a NEW ARTICLE. It is reasonable to argue that any content or articles added since January 1, 2007 (when older articles were added there was not a verification requirement)^{[citation needed]} that are unreferenced are posted directly in violation of Wikipedia policy. In Wiktionary new unreferenced articles are tagged with {{rfv}} which reads

This page has been listed on the requests for verification list. (Add entry to list.) It has been suggested that this entry might not meet Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. If evidence is not provided within a month, the disputed information will be removed.

The process that this suggestion is based on is at Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

This user welcomes new users and tags articles using Twinkle.

{{tag}}

maintenance templates