Wikipedia

User:Sweet6970/sandbox

< User:Sweet6970

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

she they

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is thread name. Thank you.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

MilesVorkosigan

edit

This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below.
Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.

Request concerning MilesVorkosigan

edit
User who is submitting this request for enforcement
Sweet6970 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 23:18, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
User against whom enforcement is requested
MilesVorkosigan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Search CT alerts: in user talk history • in system log


Sanction or remedy to be enforced
WP:GENSEX

1. 11 June 2025 00:27 [1] MV accuses me of lying on the Talk page of Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull. This was in a discussion about a source [2] At that time, the only source for the statement that 'Adult human female' was 'anti-trans' was this [3] by the National, which does not say that the slogan is 'anti-trans'.

2. 12 June 2025 00:31 [4] reverts my CT Notice on his Talk page with the edit summary Undoing bad-faith template abuse by anti-trans POV-pusher.

3. 12 June 2025 17:57 [5] refers to me as an edit-warrior.

If contentious topics restrictions are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see WP:CTOP#Awareness of contentious topics)
CT Notice [6] on 11 June 2025 at 22:00.
Additional comments by editor filing complaint

My complaint is about the personal attacks. I think there may also be a WP:CIR problem here: MV perhaps does not fully understand sourcing requirements, and the meaning of the term 'edit warrior' as used on Wikipedia.

Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% I am astonished that {Xu|SarekOfVulcan} says that {Xu|Void if removed} is clearly misrepresenting their diffs. To take just one: VIR’s diff 11 is the worst BLP violation I have ever seen. I commented at the time: [7] [8]

Regarding VIR’s diff 4 - the comments on James Esses and exploratory therapy - I initiated the discussion with an objection to a link in a quotation. Here is the whole discussion: [9] Sweet6970 (talk) 21:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)


88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 The CCRC has been criticised for its handling of the wrongful conviction of Andrew Malkinson. The Commission was warned in 2013, as a result of a review in another case, that it should check DNA evidence, but failed to do so. As a result of the failure, Malkinson’s conviction was not quashed until 2023[1]. In July 2024, an independent review of the case concluded that the Commission had failed in the Malkinson case. The Justice Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said she was seeking the removal of Helen Pitcher from her position as chair of the Commission.[2] In January 2025, Pitcher resigned. She said she had been made a scapegoat. Malkinson described this comment as "shameless", and said "I know what it truly is like to be a scapegoat."[3] After Pitcher’s resignation, Malkinson said action was needed on the Commission to "refresh the whole thing, call it something else, completely dissolve it".[4] 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at INSERT ARTICLE NAME, you may be blocked from editing. Sweet6970 (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>

Introduction to contentious topics

edit
 

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.


<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

  1. ==section heading ==

subsection heading

edit

m£££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££ I see that I have been accused by Xu|Simonm223 of tag-teaming, though without being notified of this. This is probably the discussion which Simonm223 is referring to:[10] WP:TAGTEAM includes It is often difficult to tell the difference between tag teaming and consensus-based editing. Consequently, some editors that are failing to gain consensus for their preferred changes will inappropriately accuse every editor that opposes them of being part of a "tag team". The recent complaint brought by Raladic at ANI may be relevant background here. [11] Yes, I often agree with Xu|Void if removed – that’s because he is usually right. (Or to put it another way, he often agrees with me because I am usually right.)

I have come into contact with XU|Raladic in various gensex articles. We often disagree. But Raladic’s behaviour over the Allison Bailey article is more than a content dispute – it is disruptive (and rather odd) behaviour. As VIR has mentioned, there was a disagreement about whether Bailey should be in the category of ‘Anti-transgender activist’; she is not described in that way by reliable sources, so this goes against WP:CAT. I initiated a discussion on this.[12] Raladic did not take part in the discussion, but unilaterally changed the wording, without providing any source [13]. At the same time, she proposed the article for deletion. So there is a contradiction here: Bailey is ‘known’ for founding LGB Alliance, but at the same time she is not notable enough for an article. The deletion discussion was closed as keep and rename to the case name. [14] She (Raladic) then immediately opened a new proposal to delete the new/renamed article, despite the clear ‘verdict’ to keep and rename the article to the legal case. This is disruptive and a waste of editors’ time. The impression I get is that Raladic is so opposed to Allison Bailey that if she is not described as an anti-transgender activist, then she (Raladic) wants Wikipedia not to mention her at all. This is not sensible, neutral, editing. Sweet6970 (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)



££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££ aaaaaaaaaaaaa

feria this works because there are 3 x =, whereas with barbarian etymology there are only 2 x =

barbarian

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

this works, whereas when I tried to adapt the factual dispute template for neutrality, it didn't

"""""""""""""""""""""XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Colons_and_asterisks which says this page in a nutshell: When adding a level of indentation (for purposes of a threaded reply, or to create a sub-list) copy the style of the preceding indent and then append an asterisk or colon depending upon whether you want a bullet-point or not

asterisks only

  • xxx xxx
    • xxx xxx

asterisks and colons

  • xxx xxx
    • yyy yyy (asterisk double plus colon)

not per the essay?? asterisk single repetaed plus colon

  • xxx xxx
    zzz zzz

Ah! Further -trying to get more than one para

  • xxx xxx

xxx xxx DOESN'T WORK^

  • XXX
    • YYY

Q IS THIS THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK?

    • YYY

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch&diff=prev&oldid=1097555169

[15] this works so why not on the Talkpage?


I

  1. ^ Casciani, Dominic (24 January 2024). "Andy Malkinson: DNA warnings made years before rape case overturned". bbc.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 22 January 2025.
  2. ^ Casciani, Dominic (18 July 2024). "Minister seeks to sack chair of miscarriages of justice review body". bbc.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 22 January 2025.
  3. ^ Casciani, Dominic (14 January 2025). "Chair of miscarriages of justice review body quits". bbc.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 22 January 2025.
  4. ^ Dugan, Emily (15 January 2025). "Andrew Malkinson says miscarriage of justice watchdog should be 'dissolved'". theguardian.com. Guardian. Retrieved 22 January 2025.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sweet6970/sandbox&oldid=1295542251"