September 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Leonidlednev. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Family law have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Leonidlednev (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 22:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm EthanGaming7640. I noticed that you recently removed content from Horst-Wessel-Lied without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EthanGaming7640,   Counter-Vandalism Unit 01:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raya (app). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 23:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raya (app), you may be blocked from editing. Panda619 (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black Power. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Kabul (2021)

edit

  Hello, 176.23.11.152. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kabul (2021), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to White power have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary sanctions notification

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 23:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Controversial topics, reversions, and neutral point of view

edit

As a new editor, there are a lot of things to learn here at Wikipedia, and a good place to start is by making small edits to established or newer articles which need expansion. I notice that you seem to be attracted to articles in controversial topic areas, such as Far-left politics, White power, Opposition to immigration, ACAB, Islamic State–Taliban conflict, and others, which are difficult even for very experienced editors to edit, let alone a new editor. In addition, some of your edit summaries seem to indicate a point of view that you bring to the article, such as here or here, whereas we try to maintain a neutral point of view and avoid introducing our own opinions or beliefs into an article.

Additionally, I notice that you have a number of cases of removing content along with sources, which are then reverted by other editors to restore the original content, such as here at Horst-Wessel-Lied, here at Black Power, here at Antifeminism, or here here at Black Power again. A switch in focus to less contentious topics might make things easier for you. On the other hand, if you continue as you have been, you may find yourself being blocked again, this time for disruption, and it's likely to be longer than your previous two blocks. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at my Talk page, or you can find help at the WP:Tea house, or at the WP:Help desk. Mathglot (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022

edit
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 09:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 09:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply