November 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
I'm not an "evader". But, did you HAVE to undo EVERY edit? I made numerous constructive edits, which you reverted, because...? In addition, you will see that the person who "reported" me is himself more than guilty of violating the 3RR. As, admittedly, am I. So, all those constructive edits were reverted. 197.86.195.21 (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please see WP:BANREVERT and WP:NOTTHEM. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
That is very alarming. That doesn'tactuallyaddress the issue. So, I was blocked for "evading while the serial vandal struts around like a chess pigeon. Every edit I made was reverted, and the response is 2 links. I actually tried to report the actual vandal, as well as his sock, but that was deleted, and then the vandal reported me, because I called out his longterm vandalism. But, hey, "Notthem". Ironic.

Plus, "Banrevert". Someone bans a person without foundation, and then that gives them freedom to undo EVERY edit, because they banned them. Circular reasoning.197.86.195.21 (talk) 15:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted most of the constructive edits I made that were undone. I still don't see the logic. Even if there was some bad edit I made, what point is there in reverting everything ? 197.86.195.21 (talk) 08:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Self-reply. Because that person clearly has some sort of issue. Poor soul. 197.86.195.21 (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

December 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Wow. That's really immature. I feel nothing but sympathy for you, you sad sad little man. 197.86.195.21 (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of six months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply