CREditzWiki
Welcome!
editHello, CREditzWiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2025 NFL season. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- How to avoid a conflict of interest
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Epluribusunumyall (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
CREditzWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
IP address was used by someone else (potentially) CREditzWiki (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't think so. You created IAmVerySigma and started vandalizing with it immediately after vandalizing with this account. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
My account was suspended around 01:28 on 2/11/2025 UTC for being linked with a recent vandalism case on 2024 NFL season and 2024-25 NFL Playoffs due to identical IP addresses. As far as I know, I have no affiliation with the account, nor who is/was behind the vandalism. I myself have never had intent to vandalize any articles, and I do not plan to vandalize. I came to Wikipedia less than a month ago to contribute to the world's free back pocket encyclopedia; I would never take time out of my life to cause havoc for others. After reading through your appeal guides, I understand that my case may be seen as false by moderators, but I'd like to inform them it is not. I am simply trying to update information on an article about something I am passionate about. Uphold and I understand, reverse and I understand. Thank you for your time, and while I hope your decision goes in my favor, I understand if the opposite is true. Thank you. CREditzWiki (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
CREditzWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unknowingly destructive content CREditzWiki (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You abused multiple accounts with IAmVerySigma. I recommend you take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no logged out editing, or more accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was editing the page List of Beast Games contestants, changing it by saying 'This list is incomplete, as there were 1,000 contestants following the initial video on Donaldson's channel (MrBeast). However, I missed that there was a dynamic list note, and that is my fault, and I was blocked by an admin as I was being 'destructive' on the article. I had no intent of being destructive, despite my ignorance of the dynamic list warning. My edit was reversed to be correct, though not by me, and as a younger and newer editor, I was unaware that an edit like that was to be viewed as destructive. I now understand, and will refrain from making edits that could possibly be seen as destructive in the future. CREditzWiki (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
PhilKnight, I have a question. While waiting out the standard offer, am I still permitted to edit my talk page? I have since my block, as I still have access to it, but I was wondering. Appreciate it.
- I would recommend against editing your talk page as some admins may want 6 months of no edits whatsoever. PhilKnight (talk) 06:47, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
CREditzWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
User is ready to be a productive editor CREditzWiki, editor (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I'm assuming good faith and unblocking. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:41, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello! After my account received a second block on February 23, 2025, admin PhilKnight extended me the standard offer, which I took. After creating the account IAmVerySigma two weeks prior (which was a very idiotic thing to do, as I wanted to cause chaos), I realized I actually wanted to edit and contribute to Wikipedia. Creating IAmVerySigma was a massive waste of time for everyone involved. Ignoring the reminders from editors SFDoan127 and SunDawn made it worse, as I kept going until I was blocked. They did their best to assume good faith, though there was absolutely no reason to at all, other than it being policy. The edits were very clearly vandalism! As time passed, I (obsessively) spent a lot of time reading essays written by other editors on how to be a productive editor, and practiced a bit on Simple English Wikipedia. I will not, under any circumstances, use sock puppets to cause chaos (or for that matter anything negative to the encyclopedia whatsoever), and swear to be as productive as I can be. In February, I was just an editor who made the conscious decision to vandalize. IAmVerySigma is a sad excuse for an ‘editor’, and editor is being very generous. IAmVerySigma deserved bad faith. I, an idiot, made an idiotic decision to vandalise, thinking this account wouldn’t get blocked. If I am unblocked, my IP address and this account will only be used for constructive improvements. This account was never meant to cause harm, but the person behind the IP address (at the time) slightly was. My name is the same, but my mindset toward the project is not. It has been significantly improved. In conclusion, CREditzWiki is wanting and willing to be, at all costs, a productive editor to Wikipedia and its projects, and I hope the admin team sees that. I agree to follow all Wikipedia guidelines to the best of my ability, even though there will be some mistakes (because I’m human!). Mistakes may be forgetting to find citations or unintentionally adding typos, but mistakes will never be vandalism. Vandalism is not a mistake: it’s a conscious decision to cause disruption. I made a very stupid decision, and I hope that, whoever is reviewing this, sees that I have learned and am looking to correct this. Signed, CREditzWiki, editor (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- No technical evidence of recent block evasion and based on my calculations, this user has met the six month requirement part of WP:SO. I leave the actual unblock review to the reviewing admin. --Yamla (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you all very much. I didn't know if this would work, but I'm so glad it did and I'm getting another chance. I will be making the best of it. CREditzWiki, editor (talk) 18:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
edit
Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elkhorn South High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 23:29, 26 August 2025 (UTC)