User talk:Ciphers/Archives/2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Wikidata weekly summary #293

Wikidata weekly summary #294

Wikidata weekly summary #295

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

Two new WMF Communications department leadership appointments; a new way for Wikimedia communities to communicate their capacities.
Wikipedia manipulated and copied – again
Historical and pop culture articles promoted.
How do you make an average of 3,600 edits a week for over a decade? And what do you learn when you've done it?
Plus the latest technology upgrades, tools and news.
Notable missing articles.
In deciding to de-sysop an admin for efforts to evade discussion and review of paid edits made on behalf of a PR firm, Arbitration Committee doesn't significantly change the rules around paid editing, and leaves it up to the community whether to apply special restrictions to administrators.
A look back at the most popular articles in a tumultuous and intriguing year.

Wikidata weekly summary #296

Wikidata weekly summary #297

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

Should an editor's block history be a permanent "rap sheet", or does Wikipedia forgive and forget? A reform initiative has begun.
Exemplary content recognized between January 12 and January 20, 2018
Also: Polish quality, Russian political mythologization, and multilingual analyses
The Wikimedia Foundation's Analytics team compiles a clickstream dataset, now available as a series of monthly data dumps for English, Russian, German, Spanish, and Japanese Wikipedias.
Lessons on Creating a Featured List
The most popular articles for January 14 to 27
A partnership to improve and update Wikipedia's medical content
Politeness and collegial behavior about to be taken up by Arbcom, and perhaps a revisit of the infobox question.
Also, did UCF really win?
Enjoy the humour of another contributor

Wikidata weekly summary #298

Deletion discussion about Wes Bellamy

Hello, Ciphers,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Wes Bellamy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Bellamy .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 TT me 21:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #299

Wikidata weekly summary #300

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Sweden selected for Wikimania 2019; research report on shaping the future; a scarcity of RfAs.
There might be good things about an edit war.
Editor in self-imposed exile and infobox wars a thorn in the side of arbitration committee.
The Superbowl, the Winter Olympics, death, and accusations of unspeakable things.
An eclectic mix of promotions.
And other recent tech news.
Stubs get a lot of pageviews.

Wikidata weekly summary #301

Wikidata weekly summary #302

Wikidata weekly summary #303

Wikidata weekly summary #304

Wikidata weekly summary #305

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

Is The Signpost on its last legs?
Wikimedia events, group recognition, and individual appointments are ongoing.
Arbcom considers new discretionary sanctions for infoboxes and an extension of 1RR.
Diplomats join Wikipedia for International Women's Day, the perfect "Human", how fringe theories are sustained, and perennial plagiarism from our pages.
Wakanda still fascinates; the Oscars happened; Winter Olympics come to a close; and International Women's Day gets over a million page views.
A plethora of content.
Reviewing a browser skin providing equal emphasis on both content and editing tools simultaneously.
Retrospective on article creation trial.
Nostalgia and trips down Memory Lane.

Wikidata weekly summary #306

Wikidata weekly summary #307

Wikidata weekly summary #308

Wikidata weekly summary #309

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

Following Kudpung's op-ed "Death knell sounding for The Signpost?" in the 29 March issue, user comments encouraged a burst of enthusiasm to keep the newspaper in print.
How to revive and evolve The Signpost? Big blue-sky proposals and small concrete proposals from the community and from two regular Signpost contributors.
Finally a free image Kim Jong-un. WMF wins legal battle. Stephen Hawking death tops all Wikipedia hits.
Internet companies use Wikipedia to police truth; Citogenesis proven yet again; early birthday greetings; and trains
A recent Community Health Initiative survey found only 27% of respondents are happy with the way reports of conflicts between Editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (ANI).
New major editing policy starting immediately: creation of articles in mainspace is to be limited to users with confirmed accounts
The standards have been raised for sources used in judging the notability of nonprofit and for-profit organizations.
Wikipedia's myth of the clean Wehrmacht and what you can do about it. Or, how not to be one of "the worst distributors of pro-Nazi perspectives and the Wehrmacht myth".
Can Wikipedia mobilize the same energy to fill other gaps in coverage?
What should we do about Portals? Keep them, delete them, or mark them as historical? Or should they be more closely connected with their WikiProject(s)?
Quiet month for the Arbitration Committee
Combat, weapons, monuments and personalities.
What we learned about reader motivation from a recent research study
You might not get all excersized about essays but they can be as fun as talk pages
The most popular articles from March 25 to April 14.
Plus the latest tech news and userscripts.
Material promoted from March 2 through April 20.
Honoring a day in military history, as well as peaceful borders

Wikidata weekly summary #310

Wikidata weekly summary #311

Wikidata weekly summary #312

Wikidata weekly summary #313

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

A busy office with minimal staff.
Kudpung has some thoughts on the reasons for becalmed forums and the reluctance of candidates to (wo)man the rigging.
Thoughts on how looking for the truth on Wikipedia brings out unexpected things in the real world.
After a recent Village Pump discussion, the Signpost looks at WikiProject Portals.
A busy month for discussions on major topics.
Science, sportspeople, video games, and history feature heavily in the community's picks this month.
Has an attempt to prevent historical revisionism become a content battleground?
De-recognition of Brazil user groups; brute-force attack on Wikipedia; Wikimedia Conference 2018; and assorted other silly things.
And the burning question of the day, is the monkey selfie going to space with the rest of Wikipedia?
No surprises here as the summer movie season begins.
Improved mobile app, searching, citations, inline maps, voting, and more.
Editor SusunW delves into reasons why she has created hundreds of articles about women.
Too many women still don't know that Wikipedia is editable.
Down the rabbit hole into the realm of third-grade mind.
May 25 is National Wine Day in the United States.
The dark and twisted world of Wikipedia's most powerful media institution: The Signpost.

Wikidata weekly summary #314

Wikidata weekly summary #315

Wikidata weekly summary #316

Wikidata weekly summary #317

Wikidata weekly summary #318

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

A Wiki not so Simple, a mayor motivating an editathon, a Marshall Plan, and a Wikimania under a cloud of criticism
Further developments on New Page Review and Articles for Creation work sharing
Admins volunteer to be abused – or so it seems
So it shouldn't get credit for our work, either.
Major grants announced, a new milestone for Afrikaans Wikipedia, a new WMF technical engagement team, an effort to start up a new library, two new admins – or maybe three fewer depending on your math.
Several online battles are juxtaposed with stories about cooperation and good deeds, Arbcom hovering over it all; notwithstanding, a good action movie script is not necessarily found here.
Community discussions include style updates to project-wide icons and the main page, procedural questions on royal names and jettisoning unsuitable drafts, and deeper questions of compliance with European privacy laws and the perennial issue of shrinking admin corps.
Enjoy the superb content
British politics case enters workshop phase and German war effort closes workshop, goes to Arbcom for proposals.
Two celebrities hang themselves, and the FIFA World Cup is underway
An AI assistant comes to watchlists; better mobile compatibility; new bots, tools and scripts; and more
Colorful and moving.
WMF appeals to Turkish Minister of Transport, Maritime, and Communications Ahmet Arslan to lift the block of all language versions of Wikipedia for over a year.
Studying ourselves: 'driven by a sense of mission' according to researchers.
In our next episode...
Some essays are funny, some are serious; some are just, well what exactly?
Revisiting an editor's warning to count our kidneys and keep the wolves at bay

Wikidata weekly summary #319

Deletion discussion about Pointy

Hello, Ciphers,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pointy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pointy .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Atsme📞📧 17:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Ships and shoes – and if you don't like it here, just go away!
How admin would-bes run the gauntlet.
Wikipedia referees wag a finger at Professional Wrestling editors.
New admins and Kudpung finally leaves NPP after 7 years.
One secret cabal that watches out for conspiracy theories, and another one out to stymie venture capitalists?
And more: a new user group for editing code, Women in Red, and arbitrator articles.
Spanning the gamut from warfare and destruction to pop culture to celebrations of nature and humanity's achievements.
We don't have "state agents" in a political debate, but couldn't talk about it if there were.
Finding the mathematician and Supreme Court nominee in this list is like playing Where's Waldo?.
Useful new gadgets.
Depictions of July events in several countries.
Those who study ancient Egypt.
And other recent findings, plus a roundup of research presentations at Wikimania.
Merge WikiProject Professional wrestling and ANI.
Get over it!
They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Pointy listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pointy. Since you had some involvement with the Pointy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~ Amory (utc) 11:06, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

Keep straight on – there are trolls in the hedgerows.
"Imagine a world in which every single human being is a Wikimedian. That's my commitment!"
WMF pays possible Orangemoody ring for user research, and ditches MediaWiki for publishing its own blog. Knife-edge closures at RfA.
But unfortunately its output is incompatible with open licensing.
Plus: Simple English Wikipedia stays open, a discussion on draft header templates, bias blind spot by admins offered cash?
Astronauts named Armstrong, babes of the Brits, Cortinarius caperatus and all that.
"Bridging knowledge gaps, the ubuntu way forward".
Very high and very low hits; love and loss.
Citation bot and mapframe enhancements; new licenses for Data space; possible hiccup on 12 September; per-user page, namespace, and upload blocking; and miscellaneous new bots and tools.
Some of the best pictures of 2017.
Readers prefer the AI's version 40% of the time – but it still suffers from hallucinations.
Nothing funny about it.
Remind you of any Wikipedia articles?
The Wikipedia Plays.

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

We keep on publishing as long as you keep on reading.
Wikipedia dodges a bullet in Brussels... maybe.
Can Wikipedians help save the world's knowledge and shine a light on current events?
Plus: signatures, shortcuts, and reliable sources.
No valid new requests for arbitration, no new cases.
Fourth highest view count of the year; lowest view count since 2014; death, sports, and movies ever constant.
Plus the latest scripts, bots, and tech news.
A pictorial ode to the end of summer.
As the global community of volunteer Wikimedia editors mourns the destruction of this amazing museum, this post pays tribute to all editors who have contributed restlessly to tell the story of the National Museum, our history.
And other recent research papers.
What is a four-letter word for...
You know you should...

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magsformiles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crackle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DejaVu fonts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ovzon

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ovzon, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 23:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chocolate-covered raisin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cacao
General Conference on Weights and Measures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mole
Gratuity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to INR
Joe Biden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rally
List of laser applications (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Catastrophe
Mass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Balance
Pride (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Terry Cooper

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

A slightly thinner issue, but out on time.
Is a missing article on a Nobel laureate a fail? What if her draft biography was declined as non-notable?
And it's richer than ever.
Breitbart begone; rescued by archivists; celebrating trolls?
Plus: two pending changes-related discussions, notability, and naming conventions.
Who's reading what?
Bots can do anything you want – well, almost.
WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers.
SPARQL adds sparkle to WMF projects.
We are all writing for Amazon.
No special effects here, just beautiful celestial images.
If it weren't free, of course.
Wikipedia has a long history of talk page tomfoolery.
The reviewer who declined the article gives his perspective.
The "holy-shit" slide.

October 2018

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per MOS:REFPUNCT, please do not place any space between the period at the end of a sentence and the footnote for it. DMacks (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome, and the note, DMacks. Also, thank you for noticing the error in my spacing, are there any specific articles you'd like me to clean up or correct? The thing is, I do a lot of editing on my phone, so sometimes (due to the disproportional size of my fingers versus the phone keyboard) I make some mistakes (I think some of them are due to some weird browser compatibility, as well). That said, I'll try to pay more attention moving forward, and please don't hesitate to reach out in case you noticed anything else. Best regards --Ciphers (talk) 20:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Why This Kolaveri Di (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to FM and Mister X
Accountability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Device
Child safety seat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to European
Diligence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Survey
Ken Mehlman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to RNC
Mass production (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Customization
Prison violence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blind spot
Rumman Raees (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Toronto Nationals
Undocumented feature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Oversight

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
TonyBallioni (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

rmv autoblock

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Ciphers/Archives (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: Autoblock updated to a checkuser block. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

[:user:Ponyo, check your French Wikipedia page. I sent you a letter there. thanks bud :) --Ciphers (talk) 07:35, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Your talk page has never been disabled, so your question makes no sense with this account. Your sockpuppet is locked, but neither Ponyo or I can unlock it. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
talk:TonyBallioni|talk, I'm sorry?? I must have been hearing this wrong )o 88888 are you sure, you know that youu're talking to me? ., youkno,w, cause I don't see my other accounts unblocked yet, and I'm pretty that sure your "other" account is still locked too, if you know what I'm talking apout ... so, I'd really like to know -now, actually, what's going on with you madam admin? ... :/ --Ciphers (talk) 14:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I will explain what is going on then:
  • You asked Ponyo to unlock this account so you could respond: you are able to edit your talk page to communicate with us. We are not able to unlock Clarities as neither of us are stewards.
  • We have both reviewed the CheckUser data for this account, and come to the conclusion that you and Clarities are the same person. The evidence for this is quite strong technically and behaviorally. As a former CheckUser you should know that a block of someone who was a CheckUser on another project would not be taken lightly.
  • At this time, I have no intent of lifting the block on either this or the Clarites account unless you have a very good explanation. For a CheckUser to abuse community trust like this across multiple projects by creating a badhand sock account is unconscionable. You are of course free to follow the instructions below and request another CheckUser or ArbCom review my conclusions.
  • Also, if it wasn’t already clear: you are now directly blocked by me indefinitely as a CheckUser block rather than autoblocked.
I hope this clarifies things for you. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
it does not, actually. I really don't understand the difference between IP block and blocking two accounts just because they start the the same letter from a different case, do you know what I mean? I mean If you block my account here, which is something I understand, why Can't I edit my talk page on enwp still?

Thank you for understanding, and look forward your response soon. Seriously, thank you Tony. --Ciphers (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

When Clarities was blocked this triggered an autoblock which prevented you from editing as you used the same IP as them. This was an underlying block of your IP, not the account itself.
We later determined that the autoblock was working as intended as Clarities is also your account, and this has been documented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ciphers. Since you vandalized with it and as a (then) CheckUser on another project the policy on abusing multiple accounts should be clear to you, you have now been blocked by me as a CheckUser block. This means you are unable to edit any page on the English Wikipedia other than this page, and that if you create a new account and start editing with it in the future, it will be blocked as well.
You are able to edit your en.wiki talk page on the Ciphers account (evidenced by the fact that you are editing it now). You arenot able to edit it on Clarities because a steward has globally locked the account. Local sysops cannot remove the global lock.
Your block on this account may be appealed either by copying the template below or emailing the Arbitration Committee for the English Wikipedia. The instructions on how to do so are found below.
If you have any additional questions, please let me know by replying here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
That's super clear, actually. but; I do have a question for you, as a matter of fact. Why do you italicize your ares and notes quite often? is that because you try to deliver a stronger sound message to me? or is it because you like to do my eyelashes more often than before ... you know what I'm talking about, right
) ? again, just curious :) --Ciphers (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ciphers. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ciphers. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)