Welcome

edit

Hello Clickify and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Paysach Krohn, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! I2Overcome talk 02:46, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

August 2025

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Valenzuela, Metro Manila, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I2Overcome talk 02:49, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nada Alaa moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Nada Alaa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:12, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

You should not move this page back to mainspace because of your evident conflict of interest. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:14, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

And this has been moved back to draft space again. Please stop moving it to mainspace. I'm placing a template on it to allow you to submit it for consideration to be moved to draftspace. Please don't move it on your own again. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your username

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Clickify", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 01:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the notice. I understand the username policy and I have already submitted a request for a username change to comply with it.
--~~~~ Clickify (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nada Alaa

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nada Alaa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

This article should not be speedily deleted under criterion A7 because substantial improvements have been made to establish the subject's notability and encyclopedic relevance. The content has been revised into a neutral, factual tone, and reliable, independent sources from prominent Egyptian media outlets have been added, including:
These independent newspieces provide significant and verifiable coverage of Nada Alaa and confirm her status as a notable Egyptian blogger and social media influencer. The article is not promotional but instead grounded in documented public interest.
--<span data-dtsignatureforswitching="1"></span> Clickify (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

English please

edit

re: (User:Clickify/sandbox)

  Hello Clickify, thank you for your contributions. While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Arabic; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Arabic? Please contribute there instead. If you need help, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Cabayi (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
  يُرجى عدم المساهمة باللغة العربية في هذه النسخة من ويكيبيديا، يُمكنك المساهمة باللغة العربية في النسخة العربية من ويكيبيديا. Cabayi (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

BLP privacy

edit

Twice now you have included information about the date of birth in violation of WP:BLPPRIVACY. I am removing it again. Do NOT restore this information without a citation to a reliable source. I hope I've been clear. If I haven't then by all means ASK before attempting this again. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 21:25, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Use of LLM for content creation

edit

  Hello, I'm Ponyo. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Ponyobons mots 21:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ponyo, thank you for the note. I understand the concern and I’ll make sure that all my edits are written in my own words, with proper references from reliable sources. I’ll also use my sandbox for drafting before publishing. Thanks again for pointing this out. Clickify (talk) 21:42, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nada Alaa (August 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nada Alaa

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nada Alaa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

  • Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
  • Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
  • Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply