Devolver789

August 2025

Latest comment: 10 hours ago2 comments2 people in discussion

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Draft:Steal a Brainrot, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your ___location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steal a Brainrot (August 30)

Latest comment: 1 day ago2 comments1 person in discussion

 

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has been previously declined nine times (this and alt title), and yet there is no evidence of notability. From this I can only conclude that better sources are not available. To avoid wasting further reviewer time on this draft, I am therefore now rejecting rather than merely declining this.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Devolver789! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Messing about

Latest comment: 10 hours ago3 comments2 people in discussion

When an admin formats a draft page in a particular way, especially after rejecting it, then changing the order of things is a) completely unnecessary and b) childishly disruptive. Please stop, then go have a read of Wikipedia:Competence is required and think about whether you should continue contributing. Sorry to sound harsh, although we are all required to assume good faith in others (WP:AGF) you have sorely tested that. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I concur, and I must warn Devolver789 that they are much closer to getting blocked than they probably realise. Time to fall in line and quit mucking around. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

With the IP sockpuppetry that warning has clearly fallen on deaf ears. WP:NOTHERE applies! 10mmsocket (talk) 07:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply