User talk:Ebe123/Archives/Archive 4

The following talk page is closed. This page is for an archive. Please do not modify it.

Closed 18:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC).

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. 13:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ebe123. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Mlpearc powwow 21:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Have a look at this. Our friend has definitely been at this for over a year - that andthe most recent IP have the same ___location and ISP.

Just giving you a message as I don't know the procedure for resubmitting a report and this guy gives me creepy vibes. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 22:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

PS - this nutcase has also an Ace Combat wiki on his loopy little crusade. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 22:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Its about blocks, not wiki lifespan. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

So, if there's not going to be an exception for such a blatant case, either...

1. I go through and put together a history of this guy's blocks that adds up to 365 days
2. I continue playing whack-a-mole with vandalism reports and protection requests

What else can I do? --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 22:37, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Keep playing, and then when its 1 year long for a block, relist by putting "New" instead or "rejected". ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

...I was joking about point one... --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 22:45, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Did I refile correctly? After he got hit with a range block he's run through three proxies today.--Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 01:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

You did refile correctly. I am just not investgating it since I rejected the last time. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs09:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Just wanted to be sure it was poised for someone else to. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

I wanted to let you know I created Chlorfenvinfos. Thanks. =)Shootbamboo (talk) 03:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#User:La goutte de pluie and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,OpenInfoForAll (talk) 22:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you didn't see, I already did my statement. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ebe123, I have a bit of a strange request. I am about to go over 200 on the drive. I'm wondering if it's ok for me to get the Commons Ambassador Barnstar instead of the Special Barnstar because I already have that in my collection (twice). I like getting new ones that I don't already have. Thanks. --SMasters (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will be notifying Drilnoth, the user whom is giving the awards since he seemed to be wanting too. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs09:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks. If it's not OK, I will stop at 200. If it's OK, then I will continue as I do find the work strangely therapeutic for some strange reason. lol --SMasters(talk) 09:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Its fine, but if Drilnoth doesn't agree, you will still get the Commons Ambassador Barnstar. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs10:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You posted at AN inviting people to use Abuse Response. I don't know if this is something they could help with: we have a prolific socker, see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/JAT6634, a 15-year-old boy who has now created well over 150 socks, sometimes several a day, and uses them to make "articles" about fake football teams and matches where he and his friends are captain, top scorer, etc. An approach to his school has had no effect - from the timings he edits from home. He is on a British ISP (TalkTalk/Carphone Warehouse Broadband Services) with dynamic addresses, and they range too widely for a rangeblock to be possible, but checkuser AGK (talk)has said he is willing to release IP details for an abuse report.

Do you think there is any likelihood that TalkTalk would be interested or take any action? I guess we would need to make a report immediately after one of his bursts of activity, so that checkuser could provide details of the exact timing of edits.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Okay, please make an report. I will be actionning it. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs15:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Really, please make a long-term abuse case and link it here. I will still try the contact. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs15:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Do you mean report at WP:LTA or at WP:ABUSE? (I'm not that familiar with either).JohnCD (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

LtA. But link it here. I will action it like WP:ABUSE though. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs15:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Should I give it the real name of the boy (which, with his best friends' names, is the marker by which his socks are most easily detected) or the username (JAT6634) under which his socks are listed? Indeed, in order to protect a minor from his own foolishness, should I even mention the names in the LTA report? JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You know it? Well, still we should still not say it, per the privacy policy. Notify the Wikimedia Foundation for possible resolution if they approve the terms of use. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs16:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, we know (because he has put them in at one time or another) his full name, date of birth, home town, school, parents' names... I will email you that information, which the ISP may need, after I make the LTA entry, which won't be till tomorrow. JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you email me the IP, then I could find the ISP. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Email sent. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Already saw, and already being contacted. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

• Tottenham3-0Liverpool (talk · contribs)
• Killer7884 (talk · contribs)

JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will email. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs17:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sent. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs18:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you mean you emailed me, I haven't received it? JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I meant the school. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs10:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ah, OK. That was tried before without effect, except perhaps a temporary lull - from the timings it seems he edits from home, though the amount of time he must spend on it might be a concern to the school. JohnCD (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Then, I would want the recent IPs. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs10:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checkuser AGK (talk) said here that he would be willing to provide them. JohnCD (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have asked him to give them by email, and I replied to him at the SPI case. I will be keeping an eye out. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Five more socks, for names see the SPI case if you need them, but also another IP, 92.16.122.245, which edited at these times:

• 19:28 22 Sep
• 16:02 23 Sep
• 19:47 23 Sep

That might be recent enough for the ISP to identify, if they are interested.JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

This image was tagged byKumioko as part of the aforementioned drive, and I summarily reversed that change having uploaded the image. I am a little puzzled, as the image in question is an album cover meant to be used in the article on the English Wikipedia, and as far as I know isn't allowed to be used on just any article. Transferring such files to Commons would allow for their use in any ___location on Wikipedia, if even approved there.

To top it off, I've now been told I must select a new name before the image is moved to Commons NEway, to "a name you may not like".

I don't see that this image meets Commons requirements for free-use images. Further, putting images on Commons can actually be a hassle for image use on Wikipedia; while an image can be referred to easily within one Wiki itself, that does not seem to be the case when the file is located on Commons. I may be mistaken on this, but in my view this drive is actually not helpful for these concerns. It seems like some people will tag just about any image they want whether it's eligible or not. Am I mistaken here? Has code been rewritten to make image inclusion between Wikis easier? And is there REALLY a problem having images on individual Wikis, particularly images that are single-use under restrictions such as this one?

See also User_talk:Kumioko#...huh? for what started this whole discussion. CycloneGU (talk) 23:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The tag wasn't to be moved to commons, not for the drive even. That tag was to rename the image since there's a lot of similar names. ich Moving images to commons may be troublesome, but could be used on any Wikimedia page, which occures about 1 hour after moving. The imageFile:Heavenandhell.jpg is absolutly not eligible. The code has been made easyer. Not that much as a problem but as mentioned before, its better to have it there globally instead of localy. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs10:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wikipediholic Helpers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on the Categories for discussionpage. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ebe123. I've replied on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 September 20 and provided a detailed explanation of what I find problematic. I'd appreciate if you could in turn make a more precise case for the category. Best, Pichpich (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ebe,

Hope everything's well with you. Sorry for disappearing this spring, I've had lots of real-life work to do and needed to spend less time on here. I might come back at some point, at the moment I'm just fixing occasional vandalism that I come across when reading. I'm quite out of touch with NPP now and don't have time to finish the tutorials, sorry about that :( I really enjoyed working with you though and hope you're still having fun on wikipedia. --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Its fine, I'm out of touch with NPP too. I'm in SWMT, and is doing cross-wiki work. Also, with the MtC drives, which I organize, and Abuse Response. IPs are valuable. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs21:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sir, the concerned article has been rewritten. Your review of it would be highly welcomed. Thanks.Svechu (talk) 08:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but it wasn't good still. I got it right before an sysop deleted it. Copyvio too. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank-you for agreeing to participate in my study, entitled “Online Self-presentation among Wikipedians.” I appreciate it.

As I indicated in my last message, here are five short questions about your user page that I would like you to answer. These will help me to understand your motivations for creating a user page such as yours. Please be as brief or as thorough as you like.

5 QUESTIONS

1. Are you a member of social networks such Facebook or MySpace?

1. Actually, yes, on facebook.

2. In addition to maintaining a user page in Wikipedia, have you also written or edited articles? If so, about how many times?

1. I made lots of articles for chemical compounds.

3. What are the key messages about yourself that you hope to convey with your user page?

1. I'm a wikimedian, I speak many languages, and I help with many things.

4. Have your Wikipedia contributions ever received feedback, such as being edited by others or commented on? Have you received a message from another Wikipedia user? If so, do you think your user page positively or negatively affected what other people said and how they said it?

1. Really, yes. I find myself having harsh criticism sometimes.

5. Do you see your “online self” as being different from your “offline self?” Can you elaborate?

1. Pretty much. I don't really know how to explain, but I am more relaxed. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
   _Contribs22:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please indicate your answers to these questions on your talk page, or on mine. Please respond by October 1st so that I have time to properly read your responses. If you like, you can email your answers to me instead ((Redacted)).

Thank you again : )

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

INDICATING CONSENT

By answering these questions, you indicate your agreement with the following statements:

• That you understand that you have been asked to be in a research study.

• • Well, I asked on your talk page.

• That you have read and received a copy of the Information Sheet, attached below (“Additional Information”).

• • Yes.

• That you understand the benefits and risks involved in taking part in this research study.

• • Yes.

• That you have had an opportunity to ask questions and discuss this study.

• • Yes.

• That you understand that you are free to refuse to participate, or to withdraw from the study at any time, without consequence, and that your information will be withdrawn at your request.

• • Yes.

• That the issue of confidentiality been explained to you and that you understand who will have access to your information (see “Additional Information”).

• • Yes.

• That you agree to participate.

• • Yes.

ADDITONAL INFORMATION

Background

• I am asking you to participate in a research project that is part of my MA degree.

• I am asking you because you have created a user page in Wikipedia that other people can use to learn about you.

Purpose

• My research is about how people present themselves online.

• I will look at how people present themselves when presenting themselves to the Wikipedia community.

Study Procedures

• With your consent, I will analyze the language of your user page and gather basic statistics such as the count of words, the frequency of words, the number of sections, and so on.

1. Okay, but I have 2 versions, 1 in english, and 1 in french.

• I will also read the text of your user page, looking for elements in common with ads posted by other people. I will note whether you include a picture, or links to other content on the internet.

• I ask you to answer my five questions, above. This will take about ten to fifteen minutes to complete. I will ask you to answer the questions within a week, and send your answers to me.

• Throughout my research, I will adhere to the University of Alberta Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants, which you can view athttp://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/gfcpolicymanual/policymanualsection66.cfm

Benefits

• There is no direct benefit to you for participating in this research. You may, however, find it interesting to read my perspective on how you present yourself online.

• I hope that the information I get from doing this study will help understand how technology affects the way people come together into a society.

• There is no reward or compensation for participating in this research.

Risk

• There is no direct risk for participating in this research.

Voluntary Participation

• You are under no obligation to participate in this study. Participation is completely voluntary.

• You can opt out of this study at any time before October 10, 2011, with no penalty. You can ask to have me withdraw any data that I have collected about you. Even if you agree to be in the study, you can change your mind and withdraw.

• If you decline to continue or you wish to withdraw from the study, your information will be removed from the study at your request.

Confidentiality

• This research will be used to support a project that is part of my MA degree.

• A summary of my research will be available on the University of Alberta website.

• Your personally identifiable information will be deleted and digitally shredded as soon as I have finished gathering data about you.

• Data will be kept confidential. Only I will have access to the computer file containing the data. It will be password protected. It will not be sent by email or stored online.

• I will always handle my data in compliance with University of Alberta standards.

• If you would like to receive a copy of my final report, please ask.

Further Information

• If you have any further questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Stanley Varnhagen, my research advisor for this project. If you have concerns about this study, you may contact the University of Alberta Research Ethics Committee at 780-492-2615. This office has no affiliation with the study investigators.

Thank-you again!

Thanks. I have replied. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Got it -- thank-you : )

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

So what about m:language select? Is it enabled here? Its like:

<div class="multilingual">
<div class="lang-en" lang="en">...</div>
<div class="lang-en" lang="fr">...</div>
</div>

~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs09:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I suppose that the script must be running, since it still works on image description pages that are pulled from Wikimedia Commons; that said, I don't generally see it used on en.wikipedia (probably under the assumption that editors here are likely to speak English). I realize that's not an absolute answer, but seeing as you've been waiting for two days, now, I hope that it will suffice. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs09:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This is Ian Baker. I'm a developer over at the Wikimedia Foundation.

tl;dr: We’re designing a much-improved UI for NPP tools, and we’re seeking guidance—and hopefully, screencasts of your NPP workflow—from expert New Page Patrollers like yourself. We’re asking for this so we can see (literally) what actions you take during patrolling which could be better supported through software.

I'm contacting you because, according to our statistics, you're a particularly active New Page Patroller on the English Wikipedia. Here at the WMF, we're working on a design for a much-improved NPP user interface. We hope that it will (as part of a larger strategy) address many outstanding issues in the article creation process, while also providing a more modern, streamlined and efficient UX for patrollers.

To do this successfully, we are relying upon the guidance of our most experienced patrollers. I'm sending this message to the ten most prolific patrollers in 2011, and a few other people who've been participating actively in this discussion.

Specifically, I'm hoping you can take a few minutes to record a screencast of yourself doing NPP. We're looking for a 10-15 minute session, but more is okay if you feel it's needed. Ideally, you'd first walk us through your process, explaining as you go, and then switch to doing NPP at your usual pace.

Our preliminary examination of this feature has shown that many experienced patrollers have evolved their own specially-tailored interface and workflow, often using external tools and plugins. Making an interface that works well will require understanding those tools and the motivation for using them. However, even if you haven't done that, observing your NPP technique will still be valuable, giving us insights into what factors inform your judgement, how you use the existing interface, and how long NPP generally takes an expert patroller such as yourself.

If you'd like to help, great! I've posted a set of instructions over at the relevant thread on the Article Creation Workflow talk page, which should get you everything you need to know. If something's missing or you have a question, post it there. That's also the place to go if you want to learn more about the reasoning behind this request.

I understand that people have differing expectations of privacy with regard to their own computer and voice. Therefore, you can either post this screencast publicly (place a link in the talk page above) or if you'd prefer, send it to me privately at ian@wikimedia.org.

Of course, any other input on this feature that you’d like to provide is also welcome. Don't hesitate to get involved in the discussion on the above-linked talk page, or contact me personally. I'd love to hear from you.

Thanks! raindrift (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

[1] Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 00:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ebe123, Pinkstrawberry02™ ^talk 10:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Pinkstrawberry02™ ^talk 10:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Just something to brighten your day. :) Thanks for everything you do. Please reply on Pinkstrawberry02's talk page, or if you still would like to reply here, just send them a {{talkback}} and reply here. Thanks.

No problem! I glad it made you happier. Thanks for everything you do here!Pinkstrawberry02™ ^talk 02:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

	The Commons Ambassador Barnstar
	For moving over 200 files to Wikimedia Commons in the September 2011 Move to Commons drive, you are hereby awarded this Commons Ambassador Barnstar by the members of the drive. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I know you specifically requested this barnstar rather than the Special Barnstar, so here you go! –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! But where's the Leaderboard barnstar? ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry I mixed that up. I was assuming the person giving out the stars was the organizer--Guerillero | My Talk 23:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quadell wasn't supposed to give the barnstars, but Drilnoth. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs23:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't told I wasn't "supposed" to give barnstars. Ebe123, it can be very discouraging for people when you remove barnstars that other people handed out, as you didhere. I'm just trying to thank people for their efforts. The whole point is to encourage people to help, and thank them when they do. Please, let's not let legalism get in the way of making Wikipedia a better place for everyone. – Quadell^(talk) 12:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Very small minded of Ebe123 to revert barnstar awards just because A gave it instead of B. If barnstar awards are to be reverted it should be because they were not deserved. That does not seem to be the case here. What was required was a message to Quadell and asking Drilnoth to review Quadell's awards and correct any aberrations. If Quadell cant give barnstars, I dont see how Ebe123 can revert them either; that should have been the preserve of Drilnoth. AshLin (talk) 16:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, suggest Ebe123 review WP:TPG and WP:AWARDS. Proper protocol would have been to approach Quadell first and suggest he/she remove the posts if they were, in fact, erroneously awarded. But it appears that in most instances the awards were validly placed. —Eustress ^talk 17:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Barnstars should be embraced, not rejected like Ebe123 did.HurricaneFan25 17:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ebe123, I see you have alsoopposed my candidacy for Wikimedia stewart due, in part, to this situation. Can I ask you to reconsider? Giving out barnstars has nothing to do with potential steward duties, and I hope this hasn't become personal for you. I worry that you may drive away good contributors to these sorts of drives by being vindictive in this way. I do want to participate in future drives, but I can see how some might pass on the drive simply to avoid dealing with politics and pettiness. Is there some way I can offer an olive branch, so that we can work together in good faith? –Quadell ^(talk) 19:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I was stressed out, and a bit angry. I will not re-change since I would like to see you on#cvn-sw ^connect (Not seeing you there now). I didn't see you today morning too. I was also thinking about what would happen if you deleted 5 vandalism pages on a wiki that has active administrators (isn't an emergency or cross-wiki). I will keep my cool, but forgive me otherwise. I will go more in good faith. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I don't use IRC, but I do communicate in every other way I can. (I would neveroverrule local administrators or bureaucrats on a small wiki, especially if I weren't very familiar with their policies.) Regardless, even if we disagree, thank you for your understanding and good faith. Peace, – Quadell ^(talk)20:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

		Wikipedia Motivation Award
		For your ongoing work with theMove to Commons drive. Keep up the good work! --SMasters (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The abuse response report you quite probably properly rejected was my first. Is there a better place to warn about an IP school "user" coming off a long block and continuing abusive edits? (Or, seeing as you didn't change it, was my immediate level 4 warning the only thing I needed to do?) Mark Hurd (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No there isn't actually, but if that IP gets blocked, put the status as "New" and another user on the team will investigate. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs10:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

This was closed inappropriately. I have reverted your closure Ebe. AndrewN ^talk 23:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

So then do the report yourself, and it wasn't blocked 1 month ago. You shouldn't call it wrongly closed if it didn't fit the criteria before, and it now does. We do not re-open GA reviews as they were "improperly closed" since they fit the criteria now. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 00:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

An IP like that that has such a large block log doesn't necessarily need to be currently blocked, especially if their patterns continue immediately after unblock. If it can be reasonably assumed that they are going to be blocked soon, then the case should proceed. Moreso given that this is a school, the school should be notified so they can deal with the issue on their side, as school blocks often prevent legitimate anonymous contributors. AndrewN ^talk 16:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're applying IAR then? It's okay, and was considering. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 17:35, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Can you make your script work with CommonsHelper2? Thanks! HurricaneFan25 19:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will make it at User:Ebe123/MtC/2.js. It will be ready in about 1 half hour at max and I think I'm really overestimating. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Great, thanks! HurricaneFan25 20:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Done ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ebe123,

It seems that your user page is displaying images without links to their description pages (because the entire image is covered up with another <div>. More than one image on your rotation is published under a license that requires attribution, yet this requirement is currently not being satisfied. I'm sure that you agree with me that violating copyright law is unethical and highly undesirable.

I trust that this issue will be immediately addressed, either by removing the images whose respective licenses require attribution, by including attribution links or information for each image displayed, or simply by removing that feature of your user page altogether.

Respectfully yours,

/ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oups, sorry, I will fix it quickly. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs09:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your prompt attention and response to my concerns. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 13:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ebe123,

Awhile back, you left some feedback on theHuggle experiment thatSteven Walling and the WMF summer research team ran on level one vandalism warnings. We're currently finishing up a second iteration of that experiment and about to run a third with all level one Huggle warnings (test, blanking, NPOV, etc.). The draft templates are up on the wiki. Feel free to peruse them and let us know what you think:

1. {{uw-test1-rand}}
2. {{uw-delete1-rand}}
3. {{uw-npov1-rand}}
4. {{uw-unsor1-rand}}
5. {{uw-error1-rand}}
6. {{uw-blank1-rand}}
7. {{uw-spam1-rand}}
8. {{uw-bio1-rand}}
9. {{uw-attack1-rand}}

We're watching the talk pages and welcome as much community input as possible!

I also wanted to give you a heads up about something we're thinking of trying with Twinkle. There's been some community discussion (here and here) about the fact that deletion notifications sent by Twinkle look exactly like user warnings, even though they're not. I've drafted somenew templates with the aim of testing to see if these do better at getting authors to participate in deletion discussions and/or improve their articles (because right now the numbers aredismally low). Look over them if this sounds interesting to you and let me know what you think about this as a possible A/B test! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, I like them, and I think that it will be a welcome change. I could code the new templates into Twinkle if you want. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:17, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Excellent, glad you like them! :)

Steven and I have a little more work to do on the Twinkle side – we'll need to set up a randomized delivery system like we did with Huggle, and we want to alert the Twinkle community before we deploy. But that shouldn't take too long and we'd love your help once we get all that done! I'm asking a few more editors for feedback on the content of the messages, too, so if you can think of any other Twinklers who might be interested, please feel free to direct them my way.

I'll be in touch again once everything is all ready, hopefully by the end of this week. Thanks so much for your offer to help and looking forward to the next round of testing! --Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

AzaToth, and This, that and the other might like to know, as they are like the main developers. On another note, you accidentaly removed my 2nd comment. It's fine. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oops... heh. Sorry about that. The edit button temporarily disappeared from your talk page, and I had to scroll all the way down through the whole thing to edit – threw me off my game :) --Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, I think that new users don't participate as much since they just are intimidated since they don't know the policies and that Wikipedia looks scary. They don't know what it does. The new notices fix the intimidation and scaryness by just a little. A better motive would be to personilize and teach the user what to do and all. But both of us knows that that will never happen since others don't want to. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agreed that personal messages and thoughtful instructions are always better, but I also understand how Wikipedians feel when they see huge numbers of newbies showing up every day and making the same mistakes over and over. Nobody wants to have to repeat the same instructions 500 times a day – of course, they wouldn't have to if every established Wikipedian pitched in and did a bit of newbie greeting every day instead of a tiny number of welcomers/vandal-figthers... but c'est la vie :) --Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:22, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

C'est vrai et c'est pourquoi qu'on a l'adoption et qu'on disent bienvenue des utilisateurs. Oups, sorry, I meant It's true and that's why we have user adoption and welcoming here. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Je comprends bien français, merci. I went to college in New Orleans :) --Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm acadian originaly. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs20:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, in regards to the incubator interview, I would appreciate if you could help answer the following questions:

1. You mention that there's lots going on. Where can I find a list of these (or links)?

   There's no list, and I daid that lots is going on like strategy planning, theWikimediaIncubator extension that is getting developed by SPQRobin.

2. You suggested SPQRobin for the interview. Are there any other people that could be suitable for the interview as well?

   I suppose any incubator admin including me.

3. When was the last language deployment, and which language? Any links to this?

   The last was wiktionary oriya (or.wiktionary) (Wt/or), but there's a wiki where the developers are creating it. That one is Wikipedia Sepedi (Northern Sotho) (nso.wikipedia) (Wp/nso).

The answers to these questions will help me form the base of the interview. Cheers.--SMasters (talk) 02:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Marcus Qwertyus's talk page.
Message added 07:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Marcus Qwertyus 07:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ebe123, just wanted to let you know that we've teamed up with WikiProject user warnings on atemplate testing task force. We also have a hub on Meta for cross-wiki tests (we're planning on trying this out on Portuguese and possibly other projects in the near future). Please join up if you're interested in helping with more template testing! I'm going to propose that we test on Twinkle next, and I'd definitely appreciate your help with that. Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

How about on incubator? Thanks, I will look at meta. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs • 19:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I've had trouble with the move to commons tool recently so I think I'll wait until I can get it working reliably again. Harrison49 (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Replag ahead! It's just replag and has sometimes bugs, but commonshelper 2 works well, exempt for replag. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs • 19:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've tried them both, with similar results. I'll keep an eye on it though - hopefully I'll rejoin the drive. Harrison49 (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

		Cookies!
		ReelAngelGirl has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks! So I'm ready anytime. ~~∑ße123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs • 19:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

How do I get started? I read the lesson (which was very useful) and I don't know what to do next. Thanks! ReelAngelGirl (talk) 18:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

So you're going for adoption, well, if you have any questions, ask them at the page, and I will put a quiz up. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs • 19:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Katarighe's talk page.
Message added 22:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC) Reply

Other talkback messages from same user. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk Contribs20:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Katarighe's talk page. Message added 22:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply another Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply Talkback edit Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Katarighe's talk page. Message added 23:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Oddbodz's talk page.
Message added 10:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Oddbodz (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for doing the quick fixes to the discussion report. If you're interested in becoming a co-author of the section, that position is open. :D Sven Manguard Wha? 12:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm willing but just occasionally, but I'm more for stylistic fixes. I will consider it. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have filled in the table.I think it's all ok. Oddbodz (talk) 18:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good! ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! (for the message on my guestbook) sillybillypiggy 11:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gooble, gooble. Thanks! ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs11:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I know your probably getting fed up with this now but I just thought I'd let you know that I've made some further findings about a possable origin of the IP. I've posted more detail on the abuse response page. Oddbodz (talk) 22:34, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, it's fine. Well, by the WHOIS, it seems correct, and I'm tring to get another team member contact the ISP. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs22:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Since you're not actually able to create accounts at User:∑ße123, User:∑ß∂123 andUser:∑be123, and they are part of the list of deleteable pages at Wikipedia:Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space, I have redirected them to your current userpage so as to clear the backlog. Please do not restore the content, either leave them as they are, request deletion of them, or you could go through WP:ACC to request creation of the accounts--Jac16888 ^Talk 13:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Okay. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs15:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

It looks like the MessageDeliveryBot didn't actually deliver your notifications — at least I don't see any messages delivered for the CVU at Special:Contributions/MessageDeliveryBot. I know you said it was a lot of work to set up the user list, so I hope you still have it. Mojoworker (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I requested it for tomorrow. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

But 1 thing is I requested it for the users who added themselves to the member lists. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs19:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I received the message, and actually I was planning to start reviving the project sometime after the end of the fall semester. Being a veteran member, even though I've been inactive due to school, I'll be glad to take up an active leadership role. Just give me a shout, or hit me up on IRC in #countervandalism ^connect. IRC and WP users are the same. AndrewN ^talk 00:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please see WP:SIG#NT and WP:SIG#Length. Your signature includes both a template ({{su}}) and a parserfunction (#ifeq). And it's too long as well, at 383 characters when the maximum is 255. T. Canens (talk) 10:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will get it simpler (diff). Proof: ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 10:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've closed it for as I said on the page, the discussion is on the wrong venue. It belongs onWP:VPR. Sorry. Alexandria (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why are you notifing me? It's AndrewN that started the discussion. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 21:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're being notified because you went to every possible noticeboard and posted about a discussion of how we might want to consider moving forward, and what we might want to propose with other projects in something that would be a long-term, multi-phase project. I thought I had made clear that it was an IDEA not how to actually move forward in the original post. Now, several other projects are unhappy with CVU and we may as well just archive the project now. The discussion has been re-opened. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion, as long as you remember it's not a proposal, but more of a rough draft of a possible proposal. AndrewN ^talk 23:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have removed your posts on several notice boards concerning the CVU discussion. Please remember that we are only discussing what actions we may want to take in the future to revitalize a project, not actively doing anything mentioned on the page. AndrewN ^talk 23:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oups, didn't see that comment before, so fine by me, and what I don't get is the closing of all instead of the merging of projects. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 12:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

What was proposed was something to discuss. Is it a route that the CVU wanted to pursue. It wasn't a proposal to the community to be closed. AndrewN ^talk 16:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ebe123. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I would like a name and a timestamp for that. Other than that, I got the email. (Oups, got the french keyboard on.) ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 19:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Previous unsigned comment by the wholly useless user User:Worm That Turned at 15:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC) - explained by Worm^TT · (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		For your excellent work in reinventing the CVU. Marechal Ney (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 11:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you're getting this message because you signed up to receive updates at WP:UWTEST, the task force on testing of user warnings and other notifications.

Here's what we're up to lately:

• Huggle: There are tests still running in Huggle of level 1 templates, including a new template written by DGG. A full list is availablehere
• SDPatrolBot: There is a new test running on the talk page messages ofSDPatrolBot, which warns people who remove CSD templates. (Documentation of the test is here.)
• Twinkle: We've proposed a test of AFD and PROD notifications delivered via Twinkle, which has been positively received. (See: 1,2) This test should start this week.
• Shared and dynamic IPs: Maryana's proposal to test the effect of regularly archiving shared/dynamic IP talk pages is in its final stages. There are also two relevant bot flag requests: 1, 2
• XLinkBot: the herders of XLinkBot have approved a test of its warning messages concerning external links. Test templates are being written and help is most welcome.

Thanks for your help and support, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 02:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

As on the edit filter request page noted, I moved this request to the corresponding MediaWiki page since I have no adminrights. Regards, mabdul 13:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the comments. :) As for NACs, I do a few, but only where I see "extremely clear consensus," and as for AfDs/MfDs, I'm not much of that material, nor am I much of an admin wannabe (not really, unless you really think I should :P). Thanks anyway!HurricaneFan25 23:37, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Do what you like, and honestly, sysops just have more useless cluter on the screen. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 00:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. As a file worker, I'd like your input on the idea of a noticeboard for file workers. The prototype is at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#File Namespace Noticeboard.

Please comment at the VPIL thread, or edit the page linked to there directly, as I can't keep track of this conversation if everyone I invite to comment on the matter responds on their own talk pages. SvenManguard Wha? 07:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This person, Safwat always tries to delete facts from this page, Qnet ltd, as he is trying advertise this company, as one of its IRs who tries to advertise his company, by just Copying its Profile information from its Website. I don't know how to report him, I'm just asking for an action as he's keeping deleting facts and posting his company's profile. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Peterjmikhail (talk •contribs) 14:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

So report it on WP:ANI. The instructions are there. The report you have made was for IPs. I'm not a administrator so I can't action it. ANI will get administrators. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 14:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Firstly, thank you for your opinions on my RfA. But frankly, I find anti-vandalism really boring. I realize that I am at home only in editing articles, creating them, formatting them etc. So perhaps I may not stand for Adminship again.

Coming to much more important maters, I along with a handful of other editors have almost finished up the Ra.One article. We are strongly considering it for a GAN, but I would like to be sure of such a move being worth it. I want to iron out all the possible flaws so that the article doesn't need to unnecessarily drag on the GA review process. Hence, a peer review for it has been set up. I request you to take up the review and highlight any points of improvement in the article that will ultimately push it to GA status, and later FA. I personally feel the article is better than the likes of Avatar, and certainly much ahead of any Indian film article till date, but that's just me and it may not be true. I will be much obliged if you could take up the review tomorrow, as the review has been up for 4 days and has gone unnoticed. The backlog is huge. With this, a bit of it will clear as well :D. Hope you can help us all out and Wikipedia in the end. Here is the link to the review. Cheers! AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 17:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Split? I'm sorry but perhaps you haven't seen the Avatar article, which is 165 kilobytes. I doubt Ra.One requires splitting. And by way of images, is it necessary to keep all images at right? It makes the article feel very one-sided. I personally feel an alternating arrangement makes the article look better. However, I shall discuss the matter over with the others.AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 14:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a big fan of Movies articles (but just watched The Birds) and according toWP:MOS, only sometimes, they may be at left. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 15:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Alright, and thanks for your valuable tips! AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 12:22, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Janni Lee Simner. Since you had some involvement with the Janni Lee Simner redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Yaksar (let's chat) 20:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

[2] page may be vandalised. I'm not shure, so I need to ask someone for second opinion.

Thanks in advance. --Milan.j (talk)23:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sure is! Even the edit summary. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 11:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Regarding the GAN, I don't think it is too early as the film has pretty much slowed down completely at the Box Office mainly due to the release of Rockstar. Hence, only very minor updates will be required. Besides, I am really desperate to get a second GA. Call it vanity, if you will :D. Thanks for the luck, please hope the best. Cheers!AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 12:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I know that GAs are a big deal so... Overall, just make sure there's no typos (5 typos while writing this. Oups, 7!) ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 20:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. You have a new message at ReelAngelGirl's talk page.

I've added a new user box Template:User Incubator admin. You are welcome to add this to your userpage. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 23:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

(Content removed for transparency of user)

Hey there, I'm just editing this article, could you please wait a little? Eduarda7 (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean? ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 20:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Admin's Barnstar

I, Katarighe shall introduce you this magnificant barnstar for your great and your best efforts on doing your Wikipedia since 2010. I've just been going through some of your edits, and I'm impressed with your general demeanour as an editor. You always seem to take advice well, and not get disheartened. Congrats! P.S: I will send you an e-mail message shortly. Regards Mohamed Aden Ighe(talk) 15:56, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! That made my day! I replied to you. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 20:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, we agreed with it. Thanks--Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have just seen the fact that your IP has been used instead of your user account, and perWP:BEANS i'm not posting the ___location here. So if you hate the idea of this (like I do :) for myself ), give me a ping on IRC, or drop me an email. -- DQ (t) (e) 19:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but the IP isn't editing. Anyways, I changed service providers so I got a new IP. But my other (former) IP has been editing (when I forgot to log in). ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 20:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is an open RfC awaiting, per request, an uninvolved closure. I'm unclear as to the purpose of your edit as it offers no clear resolution of the ongoing issues nor did you provide any deliberative rationale or commentary normally associated with RfC closures. Nor did you comply with the template process as designated for a responder. On those grounds I have reverted yourrecent archive edit.

If it is your purpose to provide such an uninvolved closure (which would be welcomed), please provide commentary addressing resolution of the several issues raised in the RfC. Thank you.JakeInJoisey (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Okay. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 21:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have replied here. Thanks--Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey; once again, office hours for the article feedback tool! These will be held at22:00 UTC this evening; logs from the last session can be found here. Hope to see you there :). Do drop me a note if you're not familiar with IRC and would like the cliff's notes, or if you can't attend but would like the logs/have some questions for me to pass on to the devs :).Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed you asked to the WP:CVU page to be deleted so you could move over a new version of the page. Ordinarily when this is done the new page is simply copied over (especially if it only has one author) so that the page history is preserved. Is there a particular reason page deletion is needed, or can we restore the old page then copy the new design over? I've temporarily fully protected the page to avoid any further additions to the page history until this is figured out, so I'd appreciate a quick response if possible. Thanks! Prodego ^talk 23:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

You may restore. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 23:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've done so, and moved the new version back to the sandbox. If the consensus is for copying over the new version, feel free to go ahead and do it. Prodego ^talk 23:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oops, completely forgot about that, sorry. Done. Prodego ^talk 18:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey Ebe. Please remember that we are only at the point of discussing what needs to be done with the project. We're not at the point of actually doing anything. We haven't even reached the point of a final proposal that would be ratified by CVU and presented to the community. There is still a lot of work to be done before we consider changing the page, listing divisions, administration, etc. If you have an idea, post it. If you want to work on the new front page, work on it in the sand box. Thanks. AndrewN ^talk 23:38, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I thought it was a welcome change and it had some support. Well, fine. Also let me say that anything happening that only affects the WikiProject doesn't need community approval. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 23:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

It does however, need approval from the project. Besides, we're not to the point of implementing any changes yet. AndrewN ^talk 00:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, always. ~~Ebe123~~ → report ←Contribs 00:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

-From MayhemMario 13:49, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Due to your recent weigh in at Mayor Quimby and/or Principal Skinner renaming, please feel free to weigh in on Dr. Hibbert andDr. Nick renaming. Thanks, CTJF83 21:49, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm not quite sure what kind of review a "speedy pass" involves, but I'm afraid I disagree that the Poppy Meadow article should be listed as a GA in its current state. I've opened an individual good article reassessment at Talk:Poppy Meadow/GA2. You are welcome to make comments at the review if you are interested. --BelovedFreak 13:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

It meant that I found nothing bad. ~~Ebe123~~ →report on my contribs.11:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why would you nominate an article for GA without asking the main contributor? Don't you think that's a bit rude? Anyway, IMO, the articles doesn't meet the GA criteria since it's lacking in production info. Theleftorium ^(talk)16:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also, [3] is a copyright violation. Theleftorium ^(talk) 16:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

You have agreed to adopt me but you haven't done anything.Greg Heffley 23:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oups, didn't see. Well, so go to User:Ebe123/Adopt/Gregory Heffley, and there will be a lesson on copyright. Tell me when your finished and ready for the test. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on mycontribs. 23:46, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe I am ready for my test.Greg Heffley 23:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

In this edit [4], you changed planation (which was correct) to plantation, which was incorrect. Planation is the evolutionary transformation through which a 3-D network of branches became 2-D (planar -> planation). --EncycloPetey (talk) 17:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Just a mistake (I didn't know that word before). ~~Ebe123~~ → report on mycontribs. 17:57, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply