Firefangledfeathers
Contentious topics awareness notices (reviewed May 29, 2025)
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Anti-white racism
editHi Firefangledfeathers, I disagree with your latest edit of this article. Bouvet provides important context as to how he thinks racism is conceived from a sociological point of view. This provides an additional perspective compared to the other ones in this section, i.e. Taguieff and Sabbagh's definitions of what constitutes racism, as well as Sawrikar and Katz's criticism of the "racism = prejudice + power" concept. It also links well with the South African and US sections where local anti-white sentiments are discussed in more detail. Besides, the truncated quote currently gives the impression that Bouvet is only criticizing anti-racist activists, which is not the full intention of his remarks. Bernard Lee (talk) 19:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Please also note that the removal was done by one of two users currently engaged in an edit war. I therefore believe it is better to keep the text in its original form until consensus can be found on the Talk page. Bernard Lee (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hey Bernard Lee. If you copy this over to the talk page, I'll respond there soon and other interested editors can be part of the discussion. As for the procedural question: since this content is quite new (February), I think the best approach is for proponents of the content to build consensus for inclusion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick answer. I raised the issue directly on the Talk page, as suggested. For the proposed approach, I would actually see it the other way round. Since the deletion of sourced content is mainly pushed by one user who has been edit warring, it would make more sense for them to build consensus for removal. But I am looking forward to see what everyone has to say. Bernard Lee (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Firefangledfeathers
editI'm sorry this isn't really related to editing but gosh do I love your username in a way I can't really describe. It's just kind of so poetic (which, to be fair, makes sense lol). And you could not have found a better name for your alt than Waterwangledweathers. I swear, I was laughing for like a good 10 seconds when I saw that. Anyway, cheers and thanks for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 01:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Aw, thanks GR! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
edit
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Basic assumption oneness
editFWS and wiki editors such as Firefangledfeathers shows evidence of an unconscious group dynamic called basic assumption oneness. Please research Group Analysis and reflect. Sajah Sajah Suaeed (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'll do my assigned reading, and you do yours! Start with WP:OR. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Alt-right categories
editI suspect the reason the alt-right categories were used was because there is no equivalent for far-right figures. All we have is alt-right which is basically: far-right, in America, in the second and third decades of the 21st century but not always, especially when dealing with the third decade of the 21st century during which time the term fell out of favor. The absence of the equivalent far-right categories is a bit of a problem although I do agree that your category removal was technically correct. Basically all this raises the question for me of why we have alt-right categories but not equivalent far-right ones.Simonm223 (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- It's a good question! Far-right analogues of those categories should almost certainly exist. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- You would expect a [[Category:Far-right Writers]] at least - but there seems not to be one. Simonm223 (talk) 17:50, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the help!
edit
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Thanks for volunteering at WP:RX ... your research is helping me get the Silent Parade article promoted to FA status. You and all the volunteers at WP:RX are rock stars! Noleander (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC) |
- Thanks, Noleander. RX does rock. Cool article. Ping me when you're ready for reviewers and I'll hopefully have time. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:51, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Göycen
editHello. User Göycen got their extended confirmed status taken away, then faced blocks and a topic ban [1], [2], [3]. I caught a glimpse of their edits in Pastirma, and it looks like since April 28, 2025, they’ve been engaging in these "ethnic food wars" and more (Qajar tribe) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. In one of the summaries, they claim it's a "potentially previously banned user" [12], but I couldn't verify this as the IP isn't under a ban.
There is also the issue of canvassing others to do extended confirmed edits on his behalf, as Göycen has no EC [13]: "As far as I can see, the title has become extended confirmed. Could you please undo your edit or add the role of kete in Turkish culture to the title you directed?" (machine translated)
Göycen has hardly edited since last year, and most of the edits they made seem to be tban violations. And to top it all off, a canvassing comment to evade their lack of extended confirmed. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 08:06, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi KhndzorUtogh. I'll probably be able to look into this in the next 24h or so. If more urgent action is needed, you might want to reach out to another admin or post at a notice board. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks and no worries, it’s not urgent. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement notification
editGöycen has challenged your enforcement action. See the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_Göycen. I want to be clear, my copying of their appeal was not in any way an endorsement of that appeal. --Yamla (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice, and thanks for copying over the appeal. No explanation needed! I get it. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hiya
editPerhaps a stupid question, but how meaningful/impactful is a censure in the USA? I looked at Rashida Tlaib, specifically the last sentence of the lead, and I thought "hm, of course, political opponents disagree with them, that is not very noteworthy/important, and it almost uses the same amount of space as what I assume is a lifetime of activism".
I am not American and not really into American politics. Is this DUE for inclusion in the lead? I kinda thought a censure is just that they formally say that (they think that) someone sucks. But they appear to be pretty rare. Polygnotus (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- I want to give you a full answer when I have some time on my computer. Nice to see you here P. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:08, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! No hurry. Over here we have something similar and it has completely lost all meaning (if it ever had any), has no political consequences and is just used as an insult. Polygnotus (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience, Polygnotus. I was sure there had been some prior discussion about Tlaib, and indeed there was. I was in favor of a short mention of the censure in the lead. The main person pushing for a lengthier mention turns out to have been a sockpuppet, so maybe we should start a discussion about whether any mention is necessary.
- You can get a rough sense of how common censure is at List of United States representatives expelled, censured, or reprimanded#Censured representatives. Not hyper-rare, but yes, rare. From an American perspective: we know they're just political posturing, but they do have some symbolic impact. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:15, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- This might be the only area in which American politics are actually more civilized than ours
Thanks! Polygnotus (talk) 10:18, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- No way, we're sooooooo civilized. We maintain a classy, formal legislature where we only occasionally beat each other with canes or smear shit in the hallways. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- This might be the only area in which American politics are actually more civilized than ours
- Thank you! No hurry. Over here we have something similar and it has completely lost all meaning (if it ever had any), has no political consequences and is just used as an insult. Polygnotus (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Can you help me
editThere is an editor inserting weakly sourced defamatory content into Laura Ingraham's page link 1 link2. The user was reverted and a talk discussion was started link1 link 2 where me and another editor confronted the user who inserted the content, asking them to remove it. But the editor has ignored it despite being tagged multiple times. 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:5CD3:851F:42E0:6E71 (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi IP2A02. I'm not going to get involved there. You should consider posting a summary of the issue at WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard; try and keep the summary as neutral as possible, and definitely avoid words like "defamatory". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Dawnseeker2000
editJust checking - was your block based on the edit Miles posted, or this one just before the block in which they explicitly indicate they're violating their unblock condition in their edit summary? The Bushranger One ping only 23:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- It was based on the first edit. I don't think they explicitly indicate a violation, but I guess you probably mean that they couldn't have been unaware of the condition violation, since they were reverting an edit that mentioned it explicitly. Bad stuff either way. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
ANI notice
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. (concerning Marcelapop, nothing you have done!) Patient Zerotalk 02:51, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Glad that was resolved quickly! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 11:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yep, me too! Patient Zerotalk 02:29, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- من هم همینطور سمیه راسل (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Unnecessary allegation
edit@Firefangledfeathers you see this particular user @Orangemike mentioned me in conflict interests. I just asked him for the improvement for the page. But his way of conduct was harsh plus this. Its not fair. I talked to him nicely though. Is the way to behave with other editiors. Gooshh (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Gooshh, collaborative encyclopedia creation only works if we have an atmosphere of constructive criticism. Orangemike was right to question the suitability of your edits, and even if he were wrong, it's not a conduct issue. If you continue editing here, you are likely to have many disagreements about the quality of your edits or others'. I highly recommend withdrawing your post at WP:AN. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- But that doesn't mean he should say that I am spreading false chunks and mentioned me on conflict interest list. This shows their experience. You tell me should I left? Because I am disturbed a lot. Gooshh (talk) 14:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am not telling you that you should leave. If you don't have any conflict of interest, say so at the COIN discussion. The best way to avoid suspicion in the future is to take the criticism about puffery and unreliable sources seriously. This is a chance for you to improve your editing. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- But that doesn't mean he should say that I am spreading false chunks and mentioned me on conflict interest list. This shows their experience. You tell me should I left? Because I am disturbed a lot. Gooshh (talk) 14:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Jayson Harsin
editPosting here because I believe this will distract from the report on AE. I saw your response here, and I would like to request you to reconsider you stance about the 2nd source. It is written by Jayson Harsin who is a scholar, and the book was published by scholarly publisher Taylor & Francis. Thanks. Orientls (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- The first scholarly source you linked is the Harsin piece, and the second one is Price of Modi, by Aakar Patel, published by a division of Penguin Random House. I was referring to the second one. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:09, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I got it. Thanks for clarifying. Orientls (talk) 04:11, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Thanks for linking the ANI. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:15, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I got it. Thanks for clarifying. Orientls (talk) 04:11, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
ARE
edit@Firefangledfeathers: I understand that this ANI report was extravagant for our sight thus I'll note that more experience would require. But a topic ban may not be given as a boomerang, my contributions in this topic area were always good. Rightmostdoor6 (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Rightmostdoor6. I'm happy to have a side conversation here with you about many things, but if it's evidence or argument about your case, it needs to be at AE. You're free to request a word limit extension if you need one (I haven't checked). If you do end up getting a TBAN, I'd be happy to give you some advice about best next steps. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:37, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. This is regarding the topic ban notice you left on my talk page earlier. I have responded to it on my talk page itself
- [14]. If you could please go through the response once when you have the time. Thanks Rightmostdoor6 (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Rightmosdoor6. I'll be responding in a few hours. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 10:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Block evasion
editYou blocked User:Црвена Звезда. It's clear from their editing topicvs and this screed on my talk page that 77.29.245.251 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is evading their block. I haven't blocked since it could be construed that I am in a content dispute with them. -- Whpq (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Whpq, blocked. Not available to review or revert the edits. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Whpq, turns out 100jan0vski. Not sure yet what next steps are. Maybe SPI so a CU can confirm and check for sleepers? More files to be speedied? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Given their behaviour so far, I would say yes to all of the above. -- Whpq (talk) 23:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Makes no sense to me
editWhy would you remove somebody's friendly and supportive message? Just to prevent someone from saying something nice to someone else? Levivich (talk) 13:36, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- It wasn't just nice. How would you feel about an exclusively critical comment? How would you feel about 50/50 criticism/encouragement comments, but there are a hundred more of them? Why expect subjective evaluation of the comments rather than adhere to the general rule, especially since the commenter is free to post encouragement at bbb's user talk page? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:41, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Somebody posted a nice message of encouragement to somebody else on the internet ... why would anyone remove it? Even if, for some reason I can't imagine, you thought that adding to a {hab} was something to be prevented, on a website with no firm rules where people post to closed discussions all the time, and in a discussion that was closed in less than a day, there were all sorts of other options like moving it below the {hab} or to the talk page, why choose to erase it? Why choose to interfere or prevent people being nice to each other? Seems to me like it's being mean for no good reason. Levivich (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't consider moving it to the talk page. It's a good suggestion in the general case of helpful post-close comments. I'm neutral on this comment in particular, and I do prefer to preserve content when I'm neutral. Pasted over. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:09, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Somebody posted a nice message of encouragement to somebody else on the internet ... why would anyone remove it? Even if, for some reason I can't imagine, you thought that adding to a {hab} was something to be prevented, on a website with no firm rules where people post to closed discussions all the time, and in a discussion that was closed in less than a day, there were all sorts of other options like moving it below the {hab} or to the talk page, why choose to erase it? Why choose to interfere or prevent people being nice to each other? Seems to me like it's being mean for no good reason. Levivich (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
edit
|
Good to see you're around again. Welcome back! Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 00:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC) |
- Yum! Thanks, Clayoquot. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- خوشحالم ک صحبت هایتان را میخوانم سمیه راسل (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Featured article review for J. K. Rowling
editUser:Adam Cuerden has nominated J. K. Rowling for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- oh, EOD :). Things aren't getting easier at home, and I'm not yet in the worst of it. Time is precious. As I indicated days ago I've got to decide whether to unwatch -- my interest is maintaining FAs, and keeping up with CITEVAR and other niggling issues, when no one else does it, isn't fun. AleatotoryPonderings and Olivaw-Daneel are gone. Vanamonde93 and Victoriaearle haven't indicated they can fully re-engage. ImaginesTigers pointed to a way to do the work -- which is doable under a FAR (a la Wtfiv's body of bios) -- but seems unwilling to engage further. The whole article needs to be re-structured, incorporating newer sources, and it seems most of the editors now involved are less interested in the entire article, more focused on what is now one section. That is, I'm not seeing a Wtfiv to take the lead. So ... Are you thinking to be an active participant in re-developing to newer sources? Absent enough FA-experienced people-power to get the job done, unwatching will be best for me. Bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- I am deeply conflicted. It's so hard to engage at that page, and so easy to get frustrated with the nonsense on all sides. I think I'm unlikely to be a heavy lifter.
- I hope, of course, to see you at least minimally engaged, but I hope even more that you do whatever is best for your family and sanity. I don't do much praying, but my thoughts are certainly with you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the thoughts ... the Universe will hear you and I appreciate it ... what I am doing is way way way harder, and more heartbreaking, than my wildest imagination :( The "nonsense" of, for example, just trying to keep discussions together for RFCBEFORE purposes, and keeping citations clean, takes time away from researching and writing content. I liked working at FAR because of the camaraderie, and shared knowledge and goals. Maintaining an FA means all of it, even the little stuff. I had also watchlisted James Joyce after its 2006 FAR; I unwatched when really unpleasant infobox nonsense started a few years ago, and haven't looked back. I was sorta hoping ImaginesTigers' feedback would inspire something or someone to re-engage ala Wtfiv, but if it's not gonna happen, I need to do something more pleasurable while I'm staring at the walls at home. Thanks again for keeping us in your thoughts, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- خیلی حرف های زیبایی گفتین ممنون سمیه راسل (talk) 18:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the thoughts ... the Universe will hear you and I appreciate it ... what I am doing is way way way harder, and more heartbreaking, than my wildest imagination :( The "nonsense" of, for example, just trying to keep discussions together for RFCBEFORE purposes, and keeping citations clean, takes time away from researching and writing content. I liked working at FAR because of the camaraderie, and shared knowledge and goals. Maintaining an FA means all of it, even the little stuff. I had also watchlisted James Joyce after its 2006 FAR; I unwatched when really unpleasant infobox nonsense started a few years ago, and haven't looked back. I was sorta hoping ImaginesTigers' feedback would inspire something or someone to re-engage ala Wtfiv, but if it's not gonna happen, I need to do something more pleasurable while I'm staring at the walls at home. Thanks again for keeping us in your thoughts, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
TFA
edit | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you today for your share in rescuing Emmy Noether as FA. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks GA! I'm happy to have done a little bit, and I'm grateful to those that did a lot. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's great when teamwork functions! - Stravinsky pictured on his birthday + Vienna pics - but too many who died + I have a "defiant" cantata up for GA --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- میشه بیشتر بدان سمیه راسل (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's great when teamwork functions! - Stravinsky pictured on his birthday + Vienna pics - but too many who died + I have a "defiant" cantata up for GA --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
مارا خیال بی خیالی خوش تر هست
edit@ سمیه راسل (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi سمیه راسل. I'm unable to understand your message, but through machine translation I'm getting "We prefer to be carefree". Thank you for opening up about your preferences, and happy editing! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 11:47, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Persian Gulf
editHi dear,
I have searched a lot to find a valid content which proves the Persian Gulf has another name, but I was unsuccessful!
I need help. How can we correct the Page of Persian Gulf? Because there is no valid resource which proves this sentence:
The Persian Gulf,[a] sometimes called the Arabian Gulf,[b]...
I have talked with the user @Skitash, who persist on the name arabian gulf with no any resource!
This is an official historical theme, if you confirm, I kindly ask you to change it back to what it since 1000 years (at least) has been.
With warm regards
Payam A. PayamAvarwand (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- PayamAvarwand has posted either this message or another one with similar content to seven different user talk pages. I have warned them that if they don't stop they will be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 22:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, JBW.
- PayamAvarwand, this is the sort of thing that would best be discussed at Talk:Persian Gulf. Please review the talk page archives there to see prior discussion on the matter, and consider whether your points are new. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 11:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- I will open the topic there. Because ignoring it is a lie to ourselves! Thanks PayamAvarwand (talk) 22:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Publishing article
editDear Firefangledfeathers,
I hope this message finds you well.
I am writing to kindly and respectfully ask for your assistance regarding a draft article I have written on Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gauszildi/J%C3%A1nos_Gausz
As someone new to editing in this language version, I may not be fully aware of the correct procedures for submitting a draft for review or making it publicly visible. I would be truly grateful if you could take a look at the article and let me know what the next steps should be — or if possible, help make the article live.
I sincerely hope you might be able to help me find a solution. Your guidance and support would mean a lot to me.
Thank you very much in advance for your time and kind assistance.
With best regards,
Gauszildi Gauszildi (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Gauszildi. We generally move drafts to the "Draft space" before requesting review. You can read more about making the move here. When you feel it's ready, you can request review from the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process.
- Your username has some overlap with the topic of the article. If Gausz is someone you were close to, you may have a conflict of interest, in which case you'll want to read and abide by WP:COI.
- If you'd like me to move your draft into draftspace, that's something I can help with. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Firefangledfeathers,
- Thank you for your reply. I would like to ask for your help in making my already completed Wikipedia page public.
- User:Gauszildi/János Gausz
- Thank you very much in advance for your help.
- best regards, gauszildi Gauszildi (talk) 19:28, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Gauszildi, I moved your draft to Draft:János Gausz. It is not yet public. There's a button saying "Submit the draft for review!" When you are ready, press it, and the draft will eventually be reviewed by an Article for creation volunteer. It may take some time. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Firefangledfeathers,
- Thank you so much for your kind help. I’ve submitted the draft for review, just as you suggested, and I’m really looking forward to having my first article reviewed by a kind volunteer and hopefully made public. I wrote the biography of my father, which is why I’m so enthusiastic. :-) Gauszildi (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Can i put story and peot سمیه راسل (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- سمیه راسل, it's unclear what you mean by "put story" and "peot" (which is not a common English word). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- What سمیه راسل (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- I question from you that can i put any story here سمیه راسل (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- سمیه راسل, it's unclear what you mean by "put story" and "peot" (which is not a common English word). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Can i put story and peot سمیه راسل (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Gauszildi, I moved your draft to Draft:János Gausz. It is not yet public. There's a button saying "Submit the draft for review!" When you are ready, press it, and the draft will eventually be reviewed by an Article for creation volunteer. It may take some time. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 69
edit
Issue 69, May–June 2025
In this issue we highlight a new partnership, Citation Watchlist and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.
Read the full newsletterSent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Orca31415 copyvio
editThank your for turning your attention to Orca31415.
I am hectic today and only had time to handle the most recent few of his violations... but it looks like earlier contributions also carried the problem. If you might want to tackle them or find someone who would be up for it. that would be good. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Plugging away. Thanks for working the first few. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi Firefangledfeathers, do you mind telling me what the infringing source was for the previous revdel? I wasn't able to find it since the original RD1 request template was also revdelled. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:59, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Request for review: Kocaeli Health and Technology University
edit- Subject:* University article review
- Description:* This article covers a newly established university with an infobox, logo, and cited sources. Requesting a quality assessment and suggestions for improvement.
Hi everyone,
I recently created the article Kocaeli Health and Technology University and would appreciate a review or quality rating. Thank you in advance!
Thanks
editThanks for the swift block of 2603:7000:4600:358A:3504:BA65:B735:C721. I was trying to find their last incarnation. Should we log a no-op entry in an SPI for records? Andre🚐 14:59, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- It could help, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:07, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Up to you, not that we will have trouble recognizing them if they appear again. Andre🚐 15:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Roads4117
editI see you have a spring clean at User talk:Roads4117. Any thoughts on having a really good spring clean by getting rid of *all* of the unedited draft articles, not just the six month old ones? Given that he/she hasn't edited in a while - since they warned in fact - so it's likely they've been abandoned. As it stands that bad behaviour has just been let slide in my opinion, Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- It hasn't been so long since they were active that we can conclude the drafts are abandoned. This is an exceptional case, one that might require ANI if conduct continues unchanged, but it's not so exceptional that we need to stray much from common practice. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll keep a watching eye. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Resource request reversion
edit[15] did you mean to revert this? (t · c) buidhe 22:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Butt rollback sorry Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation article at DRN
editI saw that the filing editor and one other editor were unqualified, and was starting to write a closing statement, but didn't have time to finish the statement and close the case until I had an appointment and came back from it. I was not surprised by your comment. Please review my closing statement to let me know whether I have described the rules correctly. I think that the filing editor was acting in good faith and was not attempting to do an end run around the restriction.
We know that the rules about articles related to Palestine and Israel are complex, because they are needed to control sockpuppetry, as well as canvassing of new users on other electronic media. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think your close summarized the rules well, and I agree with your assessment about the filing editor. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Anaman12321 (00:25, 23 July 2025)
editHi, how do I make a template? --Anaman12321 (talk) 00:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Anaman12321. You can create a page in template space, just as you'd create any other page. You'll navigate to it by using the Wikipedia search bar and entering "Template:YOURTEMPLATENAME". Assuming that there isn't already a template by that name, you can then create the page. Do you already have an idea for what you'd like the template to do? If not, you might want to draft a bit in your sandbox. There's more information about templates at Help:A quick guide to templates, and that guide has links to other useful pages. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Anaman12321 (03:08, 27 July 2025)
editHello, how do I add a thing saying 'this user is a WikiMule'? --Anaman12321 (talk) 03:08, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Anaman12321. It seems like you might be interested in having a userbox. I'm assuming you're aware of the generally negative connotation that "WikiMule" has? If so, I don't mind working on a userbox for you. Do you have color/image preferences? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi!
- No, I thought a WikiMule was someone who does the thankless work nobody wants to but somebody has to do?
- Could I get it in blue please? Anaman12321 (talk) 10:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- If you know which one it is, could you please tell me which WikiFauna describes what I am intending? Anaman12321 (talk) 10:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Anaman12321, I'm seeing now that the WikiMule listing at WP:WikiFauna contradicts the description at WP:WikiMule. I'm not sure which WikiFauna matches your desired meaning, but you should read through the list and see what suits you best. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
IP 103.132.168.201
edit- 103.132.168.201 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Hello. It's been a month since you blocked User:Bluishebrye. Aside from that, several IP users have been editing their sandboxes, as if the same person is behind the main account. Now, I’ve encountered another IP user editing User:Bluishebrye sandbox. Kindly check. - Arcrev1 (talk) 06:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Blocked that IP's /23 range. If there are others that have edited within the past week or so, let me know. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:07, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Maske79 on User:Maske79/Sample page (14:04, 3 August 2025)
editFacebook şifre --Maske79 (talk) 14:04, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Maske79, I'm not sure what you're asking here. Could you give a longer explanation? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Question
editHello. I hope you're having a good day. I have a question if you don't mind: is this a violation of Göycen's topic ban or not? I've read their latest block appeal at AE, though at the time I didn't feel the need to comment myself. Since the block got lifted. Göycen has been following/hounding users who he suspects may be sock of Əzərbəyəniləri, even though the admin comments in AE explicitly mentioned not to do this. In their latest edit-war here, Göycen is openly asking for someone to "please check if Grasshalm a sockpuppet of Əzərbəyəniləri", in an attempt to avoid doing a check himself (which would be a tban violation), thus WP:GAMING the system. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Khundzorutogh,
- I haven't done anything that violates my topic ban. I only discussed the user's behavior concerning the articles on filo and galaktoboureko. I am not following or targeting any users. Turkish cuisine pages outside of the AA topic area are already on my watchlist, and I do my best to prevent disruptive edits. My involvement with this specific topic arose after a question was posted on the talk page. Moreover, I have not edited any pages that fall within the scope of my topic ban. The page in question isn't related to an edit war either. The reverts I made were each related to separate issues, all of which were discussed on the user's talk page. Therefore, this doesn't meet the definition of an edit war, and I've been careful to avoid engaging in one intentionally. Although someone might perceive this as canvassing, I explicitly addressed only the user's edits within that specific topic area. Göycen (talk) 19:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'd also like to add that I've previously reported this same user as a suspected sockpuppet during my topic ban and again you have asked the same question. Since above mentioned edits are outside the AA topic area, I believe I have every right to raise such concerns Göycen (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- These pages show my cautiousness clearly:
- Kuymak page doesn't actually fall under the AA topic area, and there's a confirmed disruptive edit still remaining there. However, just because it has a tag Azerbaijani cuisine without a mention inside the text, I deliberately chose not to fix it.
- Another example is Savory spinach pie: although this page doesn't genuinely relate to Armenian cuisine, I again refrained from correcting another disruptive edit simply because there's a little mention about a similar Armenian dish.
- I am keeping my promise. Göycen (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'd also like to add that I've previously reported this same user as a suspected sockpuppet during my topic ban and again you have asked the same question. Since above mentioned edits are outside the AA topic area, I believe I have every right to raise such concerns Göycen (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Göycen, I don't think you've violated your TBAN, and I'm grateful that you appear to be taking it very seriously. If you think you can file an actionable SPI without any AA-related evidence, you are welcome to do so. You shouldn't make sockpuppetry accusations in edit summaries: either file the SPI or handle the edits based on their merits. I'm mostly concerned here about your view that "this doesn't meet the definition of an edit war". You did definitely edit war at Galaktoboureko, and the edit warring was worsened by the use of reverts with no edit summaries and the lack of talk page discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:15, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. I will avoid using such edit summaries in the future. Instead will be taking action, if it is in my reach.
- I’ve just gone through the edit warring page, and now realize that I should have raised the issue on the article’s talk page rather than a user’s talk page, as that would have been easier for others to follow. I also missed the part of the three-revert rule that says reverts count "whether involving the same or different material." I had previously assumed that different reverts didn’t count toward the limit. Additionally, since I suspect that the other IP addresses may be sockpuppets, I understand that the 3revert rule applies to individuals, not just accounts. So even in that case, it would still qualify as edit warring. Göycen (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
UTRS
editThey cannot seen the green comments. Ya gotta click the "send a reply" button. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:19, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:02, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. I've made that mistake a few times. JBW (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
You may like to read my latest comment at UTRS appeal #105390. JBW (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
edit Your feedback is requested at Talk:Silverchair on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 13:40, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Shivdix on User:Shivdix/sandbox (12:09, 20 August 2025)
editHey how to get the read url i am getting only the sandbox i am new here --Shivdix (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Shivdix, and welcome! I'm not sure what you mean by the "read url". I see you've drafted an article in your sandbox. You might like to read H:FIRST, which has some advice on creating a first article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:17, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive
edit| September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Highenergypellet (16:31, 23 August 2025)
editHi :) I came into Wikipedia to clean up the Comedy Bang! Bang! page. My edits were immediately undone by a bot for suspected vandalism. I understand why, because I'm a new account and it was a big change, but is there a reliable way to make sure that doesn't happen usually?
If you get the chance to look at my revisions for that page and let me know if there's anything that is wrong, that'd also be a huge help. But no worries if you don't have time! --Highenergypellet (talk) 16:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hey Highenergypellet. I'm a fan of CB!B!, so thanks for working on that article. Sorry you got caught up in a false positive from the bot (which I love, but bots gonna bot). As you continue to make productive edits here, the bot will be less likely to revert you. You're welcome to restore your change, but I do have some recommendations:
- I would generally recommend breaking an edit of that size into 4 or 5 smaller edits. It helps both humans and bots review the changes.
- The bot is particularly on the lookout for removal of content. It helps when you're trimming to give a bit more of a reason.
- For example, you removed some review and award info. If you believe that the removal improves the page, please explain why briefly in your edit summary.
- I see you reported the false positive. Thanks, and if Cluebot reverts you again (hopefully not), please continue reporting.
- I've got the page on my watchlist, so I can make sure your changes go through. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:39, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Cool, thank you! I've broken it up into a few different edits and put it through again. Fingers crossed :) Highenergypellet (talk) 10:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, thank you for taking the time to guide me in editing my piece. Could you please let me know how I should go about my piece? What do I need to look for and refine to make it authentic? Thanks in advance. Ben --Ben Imbun (talk) 23:37, 25 August 2025 (UTC)