HavingFun
Your edits to the Jim Ryun page are too POV. Not to mention you cannot just delete sections that you disagree with. They are all well cited so they stay, unless you can argue a good case on the talk page.
I left in some of the more personal information assuming you are know about these running camps etc. Nevertheless, sources would be good if you have them. You cannot use language such as "soundly beat", this is not encyclopedic. There may be some good stuff in the politics section but you need to add those things back individually rather than making massive controversial changes that will just get reverted. Again, take this discussion to the talk page it is the only way you will be able to make significant edits to the article without being reverted. You need to convince the other editors that you are right. David D. (Talk) 04:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Remember the talk pages. It will help you a lot to open up a line of communication. David D. (Talk) 04:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Deleting sourced material without discussion is considered vandalism. If you remain silent then I must assume your goals here are not as constructive as first hoped. Please use the talk page. David D. (Talk) 22:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
editYou have been blocked for 48 hours for edit warring. Your behaviour is unacceptable: at Wikipedia we work by discussing edits, not by edit warring - if an edit is opposed, debate it on the article's talk page, do not edit war. Guy (Help!) 23:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)