| Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 hours may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 10. |
Buddhism
editHi Imcdc, thanks for your reversions, and requesting a block this morning. I have now had a little time to delve back, and created User:Arjayay/B B which lists the IPs I have tracked down, and the articles vandalized, of which there are remarkably few. I have saved a "Related changes" search for that page, which will list every new alteration, without adding them to my (overlong) watchlist. Please feel free to do the same, if you wish, and please let me know of any more IPs you have found that have been falsifying figures in this area. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Arjayay Thanks. I had a quick look. I really didn't expect this problem to be so big. What's going on here?!?! Is there some campaign to mislead viewers on Buddhism here? Anyway, I will try to see what I can do later when I get more time. Seems much bigger issue than I anticipated - Imcdc Contact 15:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Arjayay Lets just use your page to keep track of things. I have added a few more IPs to it. Seems this is a coordinated move by both India and Bangladesh IPs. Can't believe these changes were allowed to persist for months. Might need to have a large clean up of all this mess. Also do you think we need to report a sockpuppet case? I have a feeling it could be the same user that was previously blocked. Imcdc Contact 03:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additions to the list, although I'm not sure about the 122.182 IP, it's the only one to edit that article, and the phraseology is totally different. As for an SPI, what would you ask to be investigated? There is a reluctance to associate accounts with IPs, and the only IP to have edited recently is currently blocked for 2 weeks. - Arjayay (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok in that case maybe leave SPI alone in that case. The 122.182 does have different phrasing. Maybe its a different user but at the same time, it is also making disruptive edits related to buddhism and its also quite recent so its probably worth keeping an eye out. Imcdc Contact 09:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Arjayay
- Got a question 103.205.36.8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has been making disruptive edits on Religion in China. Another Bangladesh IP which is recorded on your page. I wanna ask since it starts with 103.205 rather 103.137, could this be the user as the blocked IP that is currently ban evading? Do we have a case for suggesting range ban to include this address too? Imcdc Contact 09:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- I saw your addition of IP:103.137.161.68 to the list and reported them for block evasion - The range 103.137.161.0/24 has now been blocked for a week. As for the 103.205.36.8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) editor - that IP was already listed - you could ask for a block evasion ban, but it might be better to wait for another edit to be made after the rangeblock was imposed. Up to you - Arjayay (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Arjayay I have added User:Rohanganvir20 to your list. Do you think its a sockpuppet of User:Joseph Chakma? I find it an odd coincidence that both accounts just so happened to be created on the same week, edit in the same month, cover the same topics related to Buddhism and both were inactive until just yesterday where they suddenly had activity on the same day. Imcdc Contact 07:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Imcdc, I agree there seems to be a high degree of correlation in the dates, however, they have never edited the same article, so they may be being careful, or clever. As your last post will have notified ("pinged") User:Rohanganvir20 (and User:Joseph Chakma} of this discussion, I suspect that, if there is a connection, they are unlikely to continue. You could take it to SPI, based on the date and subject matter correlation; if you wish to do that, I would do so fairly soon, before an admin considers it "stale". - Arjayay (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Arjayay I have added User:Rohanganvir20 to your list. Do you think its a sockpuppet of User:Joseph Chakma? I find it an odd coincidence that both accounts just so happened to be created on the same week, edit in the same month, cover the same topics related to Buddhism and both were inactive until just yesterday where they suddenly had activity on the same day. Imcdc Contact 07:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- I saw your addition of IP:103.137.161.68 to the list and reported them for block evasion - The range 103.137.161.0/24 has now been blocked for a week. As for the 103.205.36.8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) editor - that IP was already listed - you could ask for a block evasion ban, but it might be better to wait for another edit to be made after the rangeblock was imposed. Up to you - Arjayay (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok in that case maybe leave SPI alone in that case. The 122.182 does have different phrasing. Maybe its a different user but at the same time, it is also making disruptive edits related to buddhism and its also quite recent so its probably worth keeping an eye out. Imcdc Contact 09:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additions to the list, although I'm not sure about the 122.182 IP, it's the only one to edit that article, and the phraseology is totally different. As for an SPI, what would you ask to be investigated? There is a reluctance to associate accounts with IPs, and the only IP to have edited recently is currently blocked for 2 weeks. - Arjayay (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Final Fantasy Pixel Remaster has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Kovcszaln6 (talk) 11:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Shore Capital Partners
edit
Hello, Imcdc. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shore Capital Partners".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
UFC fighters page
editHi brother, I have seen about the Zhang Mingyang page you created. I think so Abus Magomedov, he should have a page because his UFC record is 4-2, I'll find more information for you. AddedUpdatePoster (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm not really a regular MMA article creator these days. I do it from time to time but I don't regularly create pages for each fighter that becomes big. I do agree this fighter is ready to have his own article provided enough independent in-depth sources are put into the article. I think it would be easier for you to create the draft article yourself and get @HeinzMaster to review and approve it. The credit will go to you directly as its creator. Imcdc Contact 14:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- But I don't have much time, but I'll try it. AddedUpdatePoster (talk) 15:30, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Invitation to Join RSN Discussion on Indian Company Analyst Reports
editHi Imcdc, I hope everything's going great on your end. It was great connecting with you during our interaction at Thermax AfD. I would like to invite you to an ongoing RSN discussion focused on analyst reports of listed Indian companies. Given your experience with company pages and assessing their notability, your participation would be extremely valuable. Charlie (talk) 02:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
103.137.161.69
editThanks for reporting 103.137.161.69 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to ANI at 00.46 this morning - I had reported them at 17:41 yesterday, but got a less than helpful reply - Maybe I need to ignore the "keep it short" instruction and expand my reports - although it also seems to be the luck of the draw as to which admin you get. Thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 10:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- No problem. Yeah it is frustrating sometimes. Like its so obvious a user is up to no good yet no action is taken.
- These guys don't stop do they? Gotta keep a look out for multiple pages. Wonder if this is some larger organized movement or something. Imcdc Contact 11:44, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm afraid they are unlikely to stop, religious self-belief and promotion is one of the worst. I doubt this is formally "organized" - maybe a few friends - or a post on social media. I've added the latest pages to the B B page, so a "related changes" search will bring them all up - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Just FYI
editTemplate talk:Infobox country#We should still remove "Religion". Moxy🍁 04:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I guess I wasn't the only one who thought of this huh? Imcdc Contact 04:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Qwen.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Qwen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gaw Capital Logo.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gaw Capital Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Dymon Asia
editHey, wanted to get in touch re: the recent changes on the Dymon Asia page. I'm currently at the firm and chanced on the article, and made the edits for clarity and to update a number of factual inaccuracies, for example the firm no longer has offices in London, the Macro Fund no longer exists (and so should not be called the flagship), and neither does the Jadea Segregated Portfolio. Let me know what's the best way to propose updates without it being flagged for COI? Thanks a lot. ChinWLee (talk) 14:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- See WP:COIE. Once you have disclosed your affiliation you may make an edit request per WP:COIREQ. Make the details specific and provide adequate sources for them (independent reliable third party is the aim). An experienced editor who works on COI edits will eventually action it. Imcdc Contact 14:55, 28 August 2025 (UTC)