Isma4l
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bariire (August 11)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bariire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bariire (August 11)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bariire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Commas
editPlease stop putting commas in from of parentheses. They don't belong there. Largoplazo (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what you mean ? Isma4l (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- This edit and this edit were incorrect. In addition, in the first you had a space on both sides of the comma and in the second you put the comma inside the bold text so it was doubly incorrect in each case. Largoplazo (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- In fact, I'm seeing lots of other mistakes in your edits--a period added randomly to one item in a list, a closing quote removed, etc. I'm going to have to undo them when I have a chance. Largoplazo (talk) 13:00, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice. I will ensure to be mindful of this in the future. Isma4l (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- This edit and this edit were incorrect. In addition, in the first you had a space on both sides of the comma and in the second you put the comma inside the bold text so it was doubly incorrect in each case. Largoplazo (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maandeeq Air. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I cannot tell if your edit was vandalism, a test edit, or a competence issue. Whatever, please take more care. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice. I will ensure to be mindful of this in the future. Isma4l (talk) 15:05, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- You were warned about your standard of editing yesterday yet you have not addressed this despite saying that you would. I would strongly encourage you to read Wikipedia:Competence is required before making any further edits. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I apologize if I made any mistakes, but I am determined to contribute useful edits. Isma4l (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Did you read the link above? Nearly every one of your edits is incorrect and has had to be reverted. How will you change your behaviour? 10mmsocket (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I followed the link and read it, and I will make changes to my poorly organized editing structure.
- Thank you bro🙌 Isma4l (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- One more bad edit and you will be reported. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also, none of your edits has been to fix a typo, so your usual edit summary, "Update typo solved", is misleading. Edit summaries should be clear about the nature of your edits. See WP:Edit summaries for guidance. Largoplazo (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback. I’ll make sure my future edit summaries clearly describe the actual changes made. Isma4l (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry but how is "Text restored. Solved" a meaningful edit summary, especially when it is partially repeated on your next edit? Please describe what you changed and why. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I have returned Togdheer, a city in Somaliland. The text I changed was written in Somalia, which was misspelled. Isma4l (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- What does that mean? Can you explain in English? If you cannot write to a decent standard of English then please consider stopping editing - see the competence link above. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I have changed Somalia to Togdheer, a city in Somaliland, because the before text was incorrect. Isma4l (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- That's not what "restored" means. Largoplazo (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I have changed Somalia to Togdheer, a city in Somaliland, because the before text was incorrect. Isma4l (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- What does that mean? Can you explain in English? If you cannot write to a decent standard of English then please consider stopping editing - see the competence link above. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I have returned Togdheer, a city in Somaliland. The text I changed was written in Somalia, which was misspelled. Isma4l (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry but how is "Text restored. Solved" a meaningful edit summary, especially when it is partially repeated on your next edit? Please describe what you changed and why. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback. I’ll make sure my future edit summaries clearly describe the actual changes made. Isma4l (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also, none of your edits has been to fix a typo, so your usual edit summary, "Update typo solved", is misleading. Edit summaries should be clear about the nature of your edits. See WP:Edit summaries for guidance. Largoplazo (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- One more bad edit and you will be reported. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Did you read the link above? Nearly every one of your edits is incorrect and has had to be reverted. How will you change your behaviour? 10mmsocket (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I apologize if I made any mistakes, but I am determined to contribute useful edits. Isma4l (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- You were warned about your standard of editing yesterday yet you have not addressed this despite saying that you would. I would strongly encourage you to read Wikipedia:Competence is required before making any further edits. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)- Hello
- I would like to kindly request a review of my block If I made mistakes or unintentionally violated any rules in my contributions I sincerely apologize From now on I will do my best to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and contribute constructively Thank you for your time and consideration Isma4l (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Wikipedia Administrator please answer me 🙏💔🥹😭 Isma4l (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- You need to follow the instructions in the block notice above. Largoplazo (talk) 00:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish Hello I am writing to respectfully request a review of my block I believe the situation may have been caused because I share my internet connection with friends and it’s possible that one of them made a mistake in editing that was then associated with my account If this is the case I want to clarify that it was not my intention and I sincerely apologize For any problems this may have caused I truly value Wikipedia as a source of knowledge and I now better understand the importance of following its policies and guidelines If I am given another chance I will take extra care with my edits avoid any behavior that could be seen as disruptive and focus only on constructive contributions Thank you for your patience and for taking the time to review my request. Isma4l (talk) 14:01, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish Hello I would like to kindly request a review of my block I understand that the block notice mentioned other accounts but I want to make it clear that I do not own or operate those accounts I only use my own account Since I share my internet connection with others it is possible that activity from the same IP address led to this confusion If any mistakes or violations happened from this IP I sincerely apologize but they were not my actions I value Wikipedia and its role as a reliable source of knowledge and I now better understand the importance of following its rules and editing carefully If I am unblocked I will make sure my contributions are constructive respectful and fully in line with the guidelines Thank you very much for your time and understanding. Isma4l (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- In that case, please follow the instructions in the block notice to have your block reviewed. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:35, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra Hello I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered I want to clarify that I do not own or operate any other accounts besides my own I share my internet connection with friends and it is possible that activity from the same IP address caused this confusion I have read and carefully followed the guidelines on appealing blocks and I sincerely apologize for any issues caused. I assure you that I did not intentionally violate Wikipedia’s policies I value Wikipedia as a reliable source of knowledge and I now fully understand the importance of following its rules If I am unblocked I will make sure all edits are constructive respectful and full compliance with Wikipedia guidelines Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Isma4l (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Please follow the instruction in the block notice. Please copy
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}to the bottom of your talk page, filling in the reason you should be unblocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Please follow the instruction in the block notice. Please copy
- @Deepfriedokra Hello I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered I want to clarify that I do not own or operate any other accounts besides my own I share my internet connection with friends and it is possible that activity from the same IP address caused this confusion I have read and carefully followed the guidelines on appealing blocks and I sincerely apologize for any issues caused. I assure you that I did not intentionally violate Wikipedia’s policies I value Wikipedia as a reliable source of knowledge and I now fully understand the importance of following its rules If I am unblocked I will make sure all edits are constructive respectful and full compliance with Wikipedia guidelines Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Isma4l (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- In that case, please follow the instructions in the block notice to have your block reviewed. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:35, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Unblock request
edit{{unblock|reason=I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered. I want to clarify that I do not own or operate any other accounts besides my own. I share my internet connection with friends, and it is possible that activity from the same IP address caused this confusion. I have read and carefully followed the guidelines on appealing blocks, and I sincerely apologize for any issues caused. I assure you that I did not intentionally violate Wikipedia’s policies. I value Wikipedia as a reliable source of knowledge, and I now fully understand the importance of following its rules. If I am unblocked, I will make sure all my edits are constructive, respectful, and in full compliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you for your time and consideration. [[User:Isma4l|Isma4l]] ([[User talk:Isma4l#top|talk]]) 15:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)}} Isma4l (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
ScottishFinnishRadish: Was this a CU block or based on behavioural evidence? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- It's a cu block. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish Isma4l (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Unblock
edit
Isma4l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand this block was made as a CheckUser block. I want to make clear that I only use this one account, and I do not control or create any others. I share my internet connection with others, which may have caused the technical overlap with different accounts. I apologize for any confusion this has caused. I have read the block appeal guidelines and I fully understand the importance of editing responsibly and following Wikipedia’s rules. If unblocked, I will ensure all my edits are constructive, respectful, and policy-compliant. Thank you for reconsidering. Isma4l (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
User has agreed, below, to focus on another project instead of en.wikipedia.org for a while and will make an unblock request once they've demonstrated on that project that they are able to edit constructively. Isma4l, for future reference, only one open unblock request at a time, please; you had three (!!!). Yamla (talk) 12:23, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So, you share your connection with five other people, most of who independently edit the same topic area as you, including many of the exact same edits? This is not a convincing argument, and obviously writing your unblock request with AI/LLM/chatbot just makes it less likely the request is seriously considered. I don't think anyone actually is confused.
In your case, I would consider following WP:OFFER, and working on another project constructively in the meantime, hopefully without LLM use. Best wishes to you! CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Thank you for taking the time to review my situation I understand the points you raised regarding shared connections and overlapping edits I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused I am committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia I will focus on other projects while fully adhering to guidelines and avoiding the use of AI in my edits Given my understanding and commitment to follow Wikipedia rules I respectfully request that my CU block be reconsidered and lifted so I can continue contributing positively to the community please unblock my account I appreciate your consideration and look forward to contributing responsibly Thank you Isma4l (talk) 15:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- You have probably received the last answer you're going to receive from an administrator, since admins aren't going to go back and forth with you on this forever. You've already been given what, for now and the near future, is obviously the final decree, along with advice from CoffeeCrumbs, which you should reread because you seem to think he advised you to work on some other project in addition to this one, when the advice was in fact to find something else to do instead of this. If you haven't already read it, read WP:OFFER. Largoplazo (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
I understand
edit Isma4l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My sockpuppetry acounts are: Android Shadow Cappuccino Assassino. And if there are any more please write them down because those are all I remember. Never again will I do trolling/sockpuppetry on Wikipedia ever again I am sorry. Kind regards, Isma4l (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Thank you for sharing your other accounts. At this time, I recommend taking the standard offer: refrain from editing the English Wikipedia at all for at least six months, then return and request an unblock. In the meantime, you are free to edit on sister projects, such as the Simple Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Isma4l (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Admins: I see User:Android Shadow was blocked last week, though without having made any edits that I'm able to see. I can't tell that a User:Cappuccino Assassino exists—but a search shows User:Pandachini bananini inquiring earlier this month at both User talk:Criticize and User talk:Ponyo about the whereabouts of that user (whereupon Ponyo blocked the inquirer). Largoplazo (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. This user and the other one misspelled it—the same way. It's User:Cupaccino Assassino. Largoplazo (talk) 23:26, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Adding a note here to indicate that User talk:Pandachini bananini is currently blocked for sockpuppetry and gave up the same two alternate accounts as the ones listed here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:48, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
edit