Sybercracker
August 2025
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Please reconsider tagging
editAsilvering please don't tag my account with other years-old stale accounts without confirmation from the technical data. I have no links to Anujror. my account is linked with fazy2901 because it was used by my roommate through my device but with a different internet connection. ScottishFinnishRadish wrongly tagged my account with 3 accounts as all socks of Fazy2901 when I raised the question he fixed his mistake. I also pinged him here and asked him why he wrongly tagged my accounts with wrong users. I believe He took it personal, So when on Anujror SPI report you again pinged him and asked if sybercracker is sock of Anujror or not he wrongly said likely but not confirmed because there is no technical evidence to prove me a sock of Anujror. Sybercracker (talk) 02:11, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Asilvering I think you are honest but please see these links[1][2][3] using these links I asked ScottishFinnishRadish why he wrongly tagged other accounts.
- I believe he taking it personally and wrongly said likelySybercracker is a sock of Anujror when there are no evidences through behavior or technical data to link my account with Anujror. So I believe you should reconsider your tagging or you can separately file a new case then other admin will dig into case and then you can re-tag again per technical data. Otherwise if do you think it's a fair decision on your side then it's okay. I think on Wikipedia only admins are preveleged to block, tag and they are not accountable. If any user will raise their voice for the right cause such users will be blocked or wrongly tagged just to abandoned them from Wikipedia, because some admin sometimes take user's questions as personal. Sybercracker (talk) 02:19, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- PhilKnight Asilvering Through your past SPI career you're well aware that some admins often block innocent users even when such users are in two different countries or locations, or even when there is no technical data to prove them socks just with the comments likely or maybe. You remember Bbb23? was also forced to leave Wikipedia because he was also famous for blocking so many innocent users without check & balance or technical data. So I just want to say please be fair and don't tag my accounts wrongly.
- If you want to confirm through technical evidence ask another admin & file a new report under Anujror any non involved admin can confirm. I'm just trying to say please at least leave me alone don't tag my account with the wrong socks just to be fair, I'm already blocked your wrong tagging is unfairly making it impossible to file any future unblock request again.
- Because this wrong tagging is only an attempt to declare me a LTA vandal without any technical evidence or behavior evidence. That's not fair on your side😭. Sybercracker (talk) 02:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sir please see Bishonen first 5 accounts were blocked and all were tagged by ScottishFinnishRadish as socks of Fazy2901 & my account. When I raised questions ScottishFinnishRadish he fixed his mistake and re-tagged three accounts under different group,[4][5][6] I believe ScottishFinnishRadish took it personally and he didn't reply to my further comments. Later Asilvering asked ScottishFinnishRadish again on Anujror SPI if sybercracker is a sock of Anujror? He taking it personally said likely but without any Behavior or technical evidence. You also step in when an admin personally blocked an innocent user (@TurboSuperA+:) who raised his voice. I just seek your help regarding wrong tagging with years-old stale accounts of Anujror without technical or behavior evidence. Because this wrong tagging is a further attempt to declare me a LTA vandal or making it impossible to file any future unblock request. Please help me at least against again wrong tagging. I think admins on Wikipedia are only preveleged they can block, or tagged any users without technical or behavior evidence just with the comment of likey or maybe. When any User raise their voice such users will face block by emotional admins or wrong tagging. I believe there is no check & balance against admins. Sybercracker (talk) 03:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- So you're saying you're a sockpuppet but you're not a sockpuppet of Anujror? Does that really matter? (PS: pinging a lot of unrelated people can get your TPA revoked.) Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Listen my friend. @ChildrenWillListen you remember you pinged me on talk page of User:Sybercracker2 when I logged in into my account then I replied that that is not my account someone tried to target me and they created 3-4 accounts just in 15_10 hours and they created all accounts coping my name's spellings. Sybercracker (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- You also remember trolling of this unknown account and you reverted their edits[7] on my talk page. Then 3 recently created accounts were suddenly blocked and tagged as socks of Fazy2901 along with my account. Later when I asked and raised questions ScottishFinnishRadish fixed his mistake. He re-tagged 3 accounts under a separate group of (Sybercracker2) my only concern is that these 3 accounts and Anujror is not related to my account. 3 accounts already re-tagged by ScottishFinnishRadish who fixed his mistake, now my concern is that Anujror a LTA vandal is not related to my account I request for re-check because there is no technical or behavior data to declaire me sock of this account. Sybercracker (talk) 03:27, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you're unrelated to Sybercracker2, that's why they're tagged separately. As ArbCom have found out, sockpuppetry in this topic area is common, and I bet joe-jobbers are too. If you really want a CU to untag you to Anujror, you have to provide a better master, since this is clearly not your first account here. There's something shady going on with the other accounts involved in this, but I have never investigated this topic area in all the years I've lurked here, so I can't be of much help. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ChildrenWillListen (Syberdrive, Cracker27, Sybercracker2 & Anujror) these are not related to my account in the sense of technical evidence. Further I mentioned to ScottishFinnishRadish that there is a evidence that Anpanman11 recently created account Cracker27 he tried to edit his own SPI report User talk:Cracker27#August 2025 but ScottishFinnishRadish still not tagged this account under Anpanman11. That is okay but there are also evidence Anpanman11 also targeted me before by reporting me 2 times on ANI, Edit war notice board and DRN. I believe Anapanman11 created these 3-4 accounts with similar names like Cracker or Sybercracker2 then he mistakenly tried to edit his own SPI report through Cracker27 id. Only Fazy2901 is linked as sock of my account because it was used by my roommate 3 days ago he used my devices and he logged in into this account by using his own personal wifi connection, but he used my device without my permission when my and his account were blocked then he explained me everything, but that is fine because in technical data his account proved as linked to my account but why other 3 accounts were wrongly tagged with my account? When I raised the question the mistake was fixed. Again when Asilvering again wrongly tagged my account with years old stale accounts of Anujror so I raised question why just on the comment of ScottishFinnishRadish Asilvering want to declaire me a sock of Anujror and a LTA vandal? Sybercracker (talk) 03:39, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ChildrenWillListen Please re-check that's not fair just on the basis of doubt first three unrelated accounts were tagged as related to my account then after I raised voice re-tagged again by ScottishFinnishRadish. Later again just on the comment of ScottishFinnishRadish again my account wrongly tagged with Anujror. You can see Fazy2901 account was created few days before my account and this account was used by my roommate I told you he once logged into this account using my device but with a different internet connection so due to same device technical data showed this account as mine but that was not mine account. I already answered to Liz this question of another account.[8] This was my first account before I edited using IP. If disclosing IP is not an issue against privacy or we can personally mail IP or personal details to an admin then it's fine for me to prove what I said here in written form. Sybercracker (talk) 03:48, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not a CheckUser, and we're not even supposed to be talking about this since your talk page access is only meant for making unblock requests (using the {{unblock}}) template.) Just wait until a CU strolls by and see what they have to say. As for Sybercracker2, they could be a meatpuppet or even a separate person trying to push the same POV as Anpanman11. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Alright. Yes possibility for Sybercracker2 that was purposely created to target me. Also few days I got 4-5 notifications some one tried to login into my account with wrong passwords I have evidence in my Mail account. Yes my only question is that why my account is wrong tagged with Anujror without behavior or technical evidence. That is not fair if ScottishFinnishRadish taking it personally said that likely Anujror is related to my account. This attempt is only made it impossible thing for me to file any future unblock request. This wrong tagging is clearly an attempt to abandoned from Wikipedia I'll not be allowed to file any unblock request because I'm now wrongly tagged with years-old stale accounts of Anujror who's 100+ accounts are blocked for LTA disruption. Sybercracker (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not a CheckUser, and we're not even supposed to be talking about this since your talk page access is only meant for making unblock requests (using the {{unblock}}) template.) Just wait until a CU strolls by and see what they have to say. As for Sybercracker2, they could be a meatpuppet or even a separate person trying to push the same POV as Anpanman11. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ChildrenWillListen Please re-check that's not fair just on the basis of doubt first three unrelated accounts were tagged as related to my account then after I raised voice re-tagged again by ScottishFinnishRadish. Later again just on the comment of ScottishFinnishRadish again my account wrongly tagged with Anujror. You can see Fazy2901 account was created few days before my account and this account was used by my roommate I told you he once logged into this account using my device but with a different internet connection so due to same device technical data showed this account as mine but that was not mine account. I already answered to Liz this question of another account.[8] This was my first account before I edited using IP. If disclosing IP is not an issue against privacy or we can personally mail IP or personal details to an admin then it's fine for me to prove what I said here in written form. Sybercracker (talk) 03:48, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @ChildrenWillListen (Syberdrive, Cracker27, Sybercracker2 & Anujror) these are not related to my account in the sense of technical evidence. Further I mentioned to ScottishFinnishRadish that there is a evidence that Anpanman11 recently created account Cracker27 he tried to edit his own SPI report User talk:Cracker27#August 2025 but ScottishFinnishRadish still not tagged this account under Anpanman11. That is okay but there are also evidence Anpanman11 also targeted me before by reporting me 2 times on ANI, Edit war notice board and DRN. I believe Anapanman11 created these 3-4 accounts with similar names like Cracker or Sybercracker2 then he mistakenly tried to edit his own SPI report through Cracker27 id. Only Fazy2901 is linked as sock of my account because it was used by my roommate 3 days ago he used my devices and he logged in into this account by using his own personal wifi connection, but he used my device without my permission when my and his account were blocked then he explained me everything, but that is fine because in technical data his account proved as linked to my account but why other 3 accounts were wrongly tagged with my account? When I raised the question the mistake was fixed. Again when Asilvering again wrongly tagged my account with years old stale accounts of Anujror so I raised question why just on the comment of ScottishFinnishRadish Asilvering want to declaire me a sock of Anujror and a LTA vandal? Sybercracker (talk) 03:39, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you're unrelated to Sybercracker2, that's why they're tagged separately. As ArbCom have found out, sockpuppetry in this topic area is common, and I bet joe-jobbers are too. If you really want a CU to untag you to Anujror, you have to provide a better master, since this is clearly not your first account here. There's something shady going on with the other accounts involved in this, but I have never investigated this topic area in all the years I've lurked here, so I can't be of much help. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- You also remember trolling of this unknown account and you reverted their edits[7] on my talk page. Then 3 recently created accounts were suddenly blocked and tagged as socks of Fazy2901 along with my account. Later when I asked and raised questions ScottishFinnishRadish fixed his mistake. He re-tagged 3 accounts under a separate group of (Sybercracker2) my only concern is that these 3 accounts and Anujror is not related to my account. 3 accounts already re-tagged by ScottishFinnishRadish who fixed his mistake, now my concern is that Anujror a LTA vandal is not related to my account I request for re-check because there is no technical or behavior data to declaire me sock of this account. Sybercracker (talk) 03:27, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Listen my friend. @ChildrenWillListen you remember you pinged me on talk page of User:Sybercracker2 when I logged in into my account then I replied that that is not my account someone tried to target me and they created 3-4 accounts just in 15_10 hours and they created all accounts coping my name's spellings. Sybercracker (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- So you're saying you're a sockpuppet but you're not a sockpuppet of Anujror? Does that really matter? (PS: pinging a lot of unrelated people can get your TPA revoked.) Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sir please see Bishonen first 5 accounts were blocked and all were tagged by ScottishFinnishRadish as socks of Fazy2901 & my account. When I raised questions ScottishFinnishRadish he fixed his mistake and re-tagged three accounts under different group,[4][5][6] I believe ScottishFinnishRadish took it personally and he didn't reply to my further comments. Later Asilvering asked ScottishFinnishRadish again on Anujror SPI if sybercracker is a sock of Anujror? He taking it personally said likely but without any Behavior or technical evidence. You also step in when an admin personally blocked an innocent user (@TurboSuperA+:) who raised his voice. I just seek your help regarding wrong tagging with years-old stale accounts of Anujror without technical or behavior evidence. Because this wrong tagging is a further attempt to declare me a LTA vandal or making it impossible to file any future unblock request. Please help me at least against again wrong tagging. I think admins on Wikipedia are only preveleged they can block, or tagged any users without technical or behavior evidence just with the comment of likey or maybe. When any User raise their voice such users will face block by emotional admins or wrong tagging. I believe there is no check & balance against admins. Sybercracker (talk) 03:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Because this wrong tagging is only an attempt to declare me a LTA vandal without any technical evidence or behavior evidence. That's not fair on your side😭. Sybercracker (talk) 02:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Sybercracker, you're only tagged as a suspected sock of Anujror. That was done on the basis of technical evidence, so it's not correct to say that your account was tagged as an Anujror sock
without behavior or technical evidence
. If you want to have another checkuser give your case a second look, please file an unblock request and explain your technical details as clearly and concisely as you can. I can tell you that "my roommate logged onto this account using my device but with a different internet connection" is a very strange story (your roommate what, stole your laptop, went to a coffee shop with it specifically to use it for Wikipedia chaos, then returned it to you?) and you may want to clarify what the heck you mean there. But concisely, please. -- asilvering (talk) 04:20, 7 August 2025 (UTC)- That's not fair how I can be tagged? With a years-old bunch of stale accounts? I know being fair you yourself first hold SPI report against my account under Anujror for more evidence & there were no actual or appealing evidence to prove me sock of Anujror. All accounts were also stale. I can provide many previous examples where many SPI reports were rejected on the basis of stale accounts. My only concern here is that technical evidence didn't prove me sock of Anujror. I didn't mean to criticize you, but to highlight that you asked again ScottishFinnishRadish who first wrongly tagged 3-4 accounts with my account.
- When I pinged and asked why he did this then he fixed it but later he ignored all my comments. It's my request kindly don't tagg my account with Anujror just be fair as you were always. Also if do you think that's a strange story that when and why my roommate without my permission logged into my device and used his account in my device, I can understand your concern. But I didn't say that untagged my account with Fazy2901. That was my mistake that my roommate used my device now I'm already indefinitely blocked and punishmed for the mistake of my roommate.
- I'm okay I'll request unblock but wrong tag with Anujror whose last socks were even blocked 4-5 or maybe 6 months ago. How can you be sure technical evidence was there to prove me a sock? Technical evidence doesn't mean through CU tool? When Anujror's accounts were all stale, and provided diffs by the filer also failed to prove me a sock? then on what condition I'm tagged as suspected sock of Anujror?Just with ScottishFinnishRadish's personal comment likely? I was targeted first by Anpanman11 in 4 different reports then by a random user on SPI, then by 3-4 different use and through accounts those now re-tagged by ScottishFinnishRadish under separate group of (Sybercracker2). I have also evidence of 6-7 email notifications to show someone tried to login/hack my account with wrong passwords 10days ago for proofs I tried to send screenshots but failed to do so.Sybercracker (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sybercracker, please don't email me (or anyone else) about your block. Please keep communication on-wiki unless it's very important that it remain private, in which case, please use UTRS. If you would like to contest this block, please file an unblock request. -- asilvering (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- For the public clarification I didn't say anything different that I didn't say in my comment here where I said I want to send you screenshots to show you that there were 6-7 failed attempts to login/hack of my account on 26-27 July. But I failed to send you because I don't have your email. Then I just sent a short text or explanation but nothing was different that I discussed here.
- I contested here wrong tagging of my account with years-old a bunch of stale accounts of Anujror my unblock request is not related to unfair decision of wrong tagging. Because Scotish finish being involved or being emotional said it so it doesn't mean Scotish was 100% right. He was wrong in declaring my account as likely a sock of Anujror as he was also wrong when he tagged 3 different unrelated accounts with my account. Unfortunately this is totally unfair from your side that.Sybercracker (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sybercracker, please don't email me (or anyone else) about your block. Please keep communication on-wiki unless it's very important that it remain private, in which case, please use UTRS. If you would like to contest this block, please file an unblock request. -- asilvering (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Asilvering Please remove wrong tagging from my account I'm not likely/suspected or confirmed sock of Anujror on the basis of technical and behavior evidence. With Fazy2901 I've already accepted everything and for the punishment I'm blocked indefinitely. If you are still standing with your unfair decision of wrong tag of my account with years-old stale accounts of unrelated sockmaster then it's wrong from your side when you know there was no technical or behavior evidence to prove me a sock of Anujror.
This is also wrong when you said there were technical evidence and because Scotish said it when Scotish was wrong in tagging 3 unrelated accounts with my account in similar case he was also wrong and he said it being emotional and involved that my account is likely related to Anujror. When you said I need to file unblock request you're aware through your SPI and unblocking experience if I'll request unblock any admin will not listen to me and they'll reject my unblock request with the comment that it doesn't matter your account is suspected or confirmed sock of years-old stale sockmaster two admins tagged your account.(ScottishFinnishRadish & Asilvering tagged your account as sock with the claim that this account is suspected sock of Anujror on technical evidence) so you are proved sock on the decision of two involved admins.
ScottishFinnishRadish first wrongly tagged my account with 3 different blocked accounts after my resistance he fix it. Then you were wrong when you asked the same involved admin who was being emotional wrongly said my account is likely sock of Anujror. You should remember the recent example of Bbb23 who blocked so many innocent users without any Behavior or technical evidence and tagged users with wrong tags. There are multiple cases of abuse of admins rights and abuses of Chech-user tool. I can name some admins that are involved or were involved in blocking or tagging many innocent users without technical or behavior evidence just with the comments of likely , maybe even when two different accounts were from two different locations or countries. But its better for me to not blame any other admins that are not involved here only you and Scottish is involved. But I can only name an admin who has not been involved in wrong tagging and wrong blocks that is @PhilKnight:.
Later you may understand that there was not a single behavior evidence in Anujror's SPI report to prove me a sock. Also not any technical evidence because all Anujror's socks account were stale & also all accounts edits didn't overlap with my account. If you think you just acted on the calling of Scotish was a right decision then no problem its your personal decision. Here is also an example to prove that an admin blocked an account with the CheckUser block tool two different accounts then an involved admin stepped into the case and he corrected that wrong block.[9] (check this case and understand many admins often abuse their admin rights and even CheckUser preveleged In similar way Scottish without any evidence said my account as likely a sock of Anujror without technical or Behavior evidence)
But you're just pretending here as ScottishFinnishRadish was 100% right and you're just sticking to his personal opinion and you wrongly tagged my account with Anujror that was just an attempt by Scotish to abandon me from Wikipedia for ever by declairing my account as related to LTA vandal. Sybercracker (talk) 22:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- I have reviewed the technical evidence in this case extensively, and I agree with the conclusion that this case is connected to the Anujror case. I can't say with certainty that the connection to the suspected master is solid, but I have little doubt that this account is connected to other accounts listed in that case, such as Fancy vibēs. As such, I am going to leave the tags as they are. Furthermore I am withdrawing talkpage access because the enormous wall of text above, in which you accuse multiple administrators of acting in bad faith, is an abuse of your talkpage access and frankly, it's a distraction. WP:UTRS remains open to you. Girth Summit (blether) 16:38, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- I received your email. As I said yesterday, UTRS remains open to you. Girth Summit (blether) 07:32, 10 August 2025 (UTC)