Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/...From the Pagan Vastlands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...From the Pagan Vastlands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC and no assertion of notability is made here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep This album has been monumental to the development of one of the biggest blackened death metal bands in history. Reviews of this album are not hard to find. Also, this was released on two other, highly notable labels. Both Pagan Records and Wild Rags Records re-released this album. Easily meets music guidelines. Undead Warrior (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Undead Warrior is correct on this one, except note that "speedy keep" is not technically an option here (see WP:CSD). Though I'm not sure how reliable many of the reviews really are, the basic "assumed non-notable" rationale does not hold up here due to the item's subsequent history. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.