Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% ProLife PAC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 02:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 100% ProLife PAC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested speedy. Non notable political action group. Article provides no third party references. A search on "100% ProLife" returns 21 unique GHits, the majority of which are not about the group and none of which are reliable sources Nuttah68 20:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not established per WP:ORG, and unsourced (per WP:ATT). An advocacy group with possibly notable members, but the group itself seems to be NN. Googling "100% ProLife PAC" only gives 3 hits: one to WP, one to the group's site & one to a political endorsement. EyeSereneTALK 20:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Promotional tone (WP:NOT a soapbox). Fails notability per WP:ORG, WP:RS. -- MarcoTolo 22:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I removed the speedy as it asserted importance, but the article seems to have no 3rd party documentation, and I too can find no additional sources. DGG (talk) 04:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. Subject is WP:NN, and article has no WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 19:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. Maxamegalon2000 19:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.