- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Serves no useful purpose, does not reference it's sources, unencyclopediac CloudNine 17:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: random useless entry. --Hetar 20:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, useful information relevant to the US tax code or perhaps merge into a broader category. Cool3 20:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep part of the tax code and therefore important to millions of people. Not much different that the articles found in Category:Taxation in the United States. Furthermore, "serves no useful purpose" is a tad bit too subjective for me and not valid grounds for removing content in my opinion. -- JJay 23:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per JJay. The originator has not helped his cause by voiding the stub and hoax tags without providing any feedback however. --New Progressive 23:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but needs serious work. Eivind 00:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per JJay. Kappa 11:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per fugi. This is accurate information and is part of the tax code. No reason to delete. 11:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep verifiable and significant FloNight 13:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.