Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/156th Weather Flight
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to 145th Airlift Wing. according to the consensus DGG ( talk ) 01:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 156th Weather Flight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not have enough significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject to be considered notable. Generally units of this size (21 personnel) are not considered notable by WP:MILUNIT. — -dainomite 01:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — -dainomite 01:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 145th Airlift Wing, redirect to higher level command which unit is associated with.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to 145th Airlift Wing. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect. Not enough for a stand alone....William 01:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.