- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 1977 Trinity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
While the Byte magazine article does refer to the three companies as the 1977 trinity, it's clear that this is simply a rhetorical flourish, and not intended as some sort of proper name. Indeed, there are no other references to these companies by that name outside of this one Byte article, Wikipedia, and its mirrors. In other words, this was an offhand description that isn't, in and of itself, a discrete and notable topic. The article should be deleted and mention of the term, if the editors of that article deem it notable, should be moved into History of computing hardware. Nandesuka (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom, offhand description never used elsewhere—G716 <T·C> 03:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: A term used in 1 article is not notable. DCEdwards1966 14:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just a one-off reference, not sufficient basis for an article. --Dhartung | Talk 22:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.