Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 July Movement (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1 July Movement

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally PRODed by me, it was converted, out of process by an inexperienced user using my signature, to a AfD which had to be procedurally closed as keep. Concern was: Small organisation recently created with the goal of founding a new political party. Translated from the French Wikipedia (where it is also PRODed) without attribution. Totally unsourced. Fails notability at WP:ORG. Let's do it properly this time. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep major political party created by Benoît Hamon. For FI, it is a political party which considers itsef as a movement. It is possible that the movement won't change it name. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Panam2014, I see that you are a major oontributor to the article. According t this statement: The final name of the movement will be announced on December 2, 2017 at a national meeting. To this end, a questionnaire was sent to the activists on 22 October to choose the name and define the functioning of the future party., the organisation is not a political party. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is a political movement but not a party or a simple political organization. The congress will took place in Deecember. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sufficiently covered in reliable sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], etc. Even if you didn't believe it's notable enough, why would we delete this rather than merge to Benoît Hamon? --Michig (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I am in favor of keeping all articles about political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections regardless of size or ideology. Our readers have a right to expect such things from a comprehensive encyclopedia. Moreover, this passes GNG, per the exhaustive list of sources provided by Michig above. Carrite (talk) 19:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep almost all political parties are kept; one in a major country started by a major political figure will definitely be notable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.