Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st NetVision eBusiness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1st NetVision eBusiness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another editor previously put a WP:PROD on this article with the rationale "No indication given of notability for this software. Unreferenced.". The Prod was removed by the article creator without comment or addressing the issues. I'm bringing this to AfD on a similar rationale: that there is no evidence that this software meets the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Here's a good one, it has no sources, thus failing WP:SOURCES. Since it can't be verified (as it is not sourced), then it falls under WP:NN for a lack of notability & verifiable content. Яεñ99 (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources are not required to be in the article to avoid deletion, only that they must exist. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:: In addition to having no sources, it reads like an advertisement, and Wikipedia is not a soapbox or advertising space. jfd34 (talk) 12:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No improvement since the prod was added. The author seems determined to ignore all the very strong hints that something is wrong. Peridon (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as above, unreferenced with no indication of notability; also, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 23:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.