This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedied. android79 19:42, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a vanity page, and non-notable (1550 Google hits, the vast majority unrelated). Ashenai 13:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per above. Ashenai 13:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but I don't think it's vanity. What's the opposite - anti-vanity? CLW 13:33, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN and almost libel --Quasipalm 18:50, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as nn-bio. Unless posting to message boards is an "assertion of notability" these days. So tagged. Friday (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- 86.133.3.121, please don't blank this page. If you don't think the 1st Wizard article should be deleted, you should tell us why not! We need to hear all points of view. --Ashenai 18:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.