- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN Neologism. Artw 04:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - first ten ghits are irrelevant to this neologism. MER-C 09:42, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NEO, and is innacurate as well. Appending a 2.0 to a thing can often have nothing to do with social participation. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn neologism. Cool3 20:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 2.0 per MichaelBillington. --Alan Au 21:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - seems like a marketing concept from Tim O'Reilly. Can't see any non-O'Reilly acceptance of this so fails notability for me. JASpencer 07:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.