Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 CPPCC Plenary Session

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2006 CPPCC Plenary Session

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article. Natadmim (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep - no valid deletion rationale, there is no requirement to delete unsourced articles (except WP:BLP). --Soman (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Soman, WP:V requires removal of unsourced contested content.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. This is a consultative body, not a legislature, so I don’t think individual sessions are notable. Zh.wiki does not have individual articles for individual sessions. Mccapra (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.